Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Business Week Article

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Does this mean in all cases of TCAS deferral the flight should be refused, how about a generator on a 3 generator airplanes, should that also be refused every time? If we never flew there would never be an accident

Yip-

It means this: Let's say your wife was on an airplane flying out of ABQ to Disney World to take the grandkids for a vacation. TCAS wasn't working, but the Captain decided to take the aircraft anyway. On approach into MCO the aircraft your wife and grandkids was flying in collided with a Cessna, with pictures like this showing up on the news from people on the ground who happened to catch some shots of that aircraft's final moments. During the course of the investigation you found out that had your wife and grandkid's aircraft had an operable TCAS, it is likely the collision with the Cessna never would have happened.

So Yip, would you sue? Would you be "OK" with the Captain's decision to take the aircraft with a broken TCAS? Wanna bet that you would sue the pants off that airline? Wanna bet that you would be extremely upset that the death of your loved ones could have been avoided if they had simply made the repair instead of flying? Wanna bet that if you were called as a witness you'd be criticizing the Captain's decision to take the plane with TCAS inop? Wanna bet that you wouldn't shrug your shoulders and say, "Oh well, it was a legal deferral" and not take part in any legal action?

So if you're asking me, Yip, it means that if I'm sitting at a station like the Gulfstream Captain was where the repair could have been made and the TCAS was broken, it means fix it and then I'll take the aircraft. No brainer to me and most of the guys I fly with at my airline from what I have seen. Things like TCAS and EGPWS shouldn't even be deferrable IMO, but unfortunately we have a weak regulatory partner in the FAA, so that's where the Captain needs to step in and fill that gaping void left by that organization.

And if you think I'm going to waste my time arguing about "every time" pretend scenarios, forget it. Find some new guys to play with over on the Training and Instruction forum if you want to talk about "what if's." I'm sure they'd get a lot of the discussion.

If you decide to answer this post YIP, in the first sentence please state whether you would sue or not. Yes or No please.
 
would not sue

There it was in the first sentence. I am not a safety conscious as you; I can see from your posts you are way above me when it comes to understanding aviation safety. So it would be foolish to even attempt to match wits with someone as safety conscious as you. BTW I fly non-TCAS airplanes into some of the busiest airports in the country. I do not feel it is a risk. To each his own. Keep up the good work

Yip-

It means this: Let's say your wife was on an airplane flying out of ABQ to Disney World to take the grandkids for a vacation. TCAS wasn't working, but the Captain decided to take the aircraft anyway. On approach into MCO the aircraft your wife and grandkids was flying in collided with a Cessna, with pictures like this showing up on the news from people on the ground who happened to catch some shots of that aircraft's final moments. During the course of the investigation you found out that had your wife and grandkid's aircraft had an operable TCAS, it is likely the collision with the Cessna never would have happened.

So Yip, would you sue? Would you be "OK" with the Captain's decision to take the aircraft with a broken TCAS? Wanna bet that you would sue the pants off that airline? Wanna bet that you would be extremely upset that the death of your loved ones could have been avoided if they had simply made the repair instead of flying? Wanna bet that if you were called as a witness you'd be criticizing the Captain's decision to take the plane with TCAS inop? Wanna bet that you wouldn't shrug your shoulders and say, "Oh well, it was a legal deferral" and not take part in any legal action?

So if you're asking me, Yip, it means that if I'm sitting at a station like the Gulfstream Captain was where the repair could have been made and the TCAS was broken, it means fix it and then I'll take the aircraft. No brainer to me and most of the guys I fly with at my airline from what I have seen. Things like TCAS and EGPWS shouldn't even be deferrable IMO, but unfortunately we have a weak regulatory partner in the FAA, so that's where the Captain needs to step in and fill that gaping void left by that organization.

And if you think I'm going to waste my time arguing about "every time" pretend scenarios, forget it. Find some new guys to play with over on the Training and Instruction forum if you want to talk about "what if's." I'm sure they'd get a lot of the discussion.

If you decide to answer this post YIP, in the first sentence please state whether you would sue or not. Yes or No please.
 
Sarcasm is the protest of the weak-
 
There it was in the first sentence. I am not a safety conscious as you; I can see from your posts you are way above me when it comes to understanding aviation safety. So it would be foolish to even attempt to match wits with someone as safety conscious as you. BTW I fly non-TCAS airplanes into some of the busiest airports in the country. I do not feel it is a risk. To each his own. Keep up the good work

You wouldn't sue, huh? You'd opt out of the resulting class action? You wouldn't be a bit upset with the Captain and/or the airline you entrusted your wife and grand kids for flying around with inop TCAS? Somehow, I doubt it, but I guess I'll take your word for it. Personally, if that happened to me, saying I would be extremely vengeful would be an understatement. As a paying passenger (which I am a few times a year with the family), I'd thank the Captain if I found out he delayed my flight because the TCAS was inop.

I second the thought about your sarcasm. I will keep up the good work. When you're flying around with your TCAS inop, just make sure you have your transponder on so I can at least avoid you if one of us screws up an altitude or heading.
 
different world

I second the thought about your sarcasm. I will keep up the good work. When you're flying around with your TCAS inop, just make sure you have your transponder on so I can at least avoid you if one of us screws up an altitude or heading.
Inop, how about not even on the equipment list, we live and fly in different worlds, if it is legal to fly, and the trip can be competed safely; I fly. And yes I do keep my transponder on at all times. BTW I would receive some compensation for the accident, which would be satisfactory. My dislike of ambulance chasing atty's is so strong, I would not want to be involved in anything to do with them. I am older, comfortable approaching my retirement. Still living the dream of a 5-year, I am truly a very lucky guy.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top