Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Both USAPA, APA Reject Scanners. ALPA, Not So Much.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Flyprdu

You Want This, Don't You.
Joined
Nov 3, 2002
Posts
1,541
I mean seriously, did we not see this coming?

Capt. John Prater said:
Dear Members:
The recent policy decision by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to require that all persons, including pilots, be screened by Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) machines and/or highly intrusive pat-down searches is the latest change in a long line of ever-increasing security measures that unnecessarily frustrate and burden airline pilots.
Instead of merely complaining to the media about the changed procedures or writing to you with advice on the security screening options that you already know, I decided to try to change the U.S. government’s decisions. I have told our members and representatives on numerous occasions that your union’s influence in government, legislative, and regulatory matters is based upon our access to the highest levels of this government, and that access is due to ALPA’s long-term commitment to provide member expertise and dedicated professional staff to find solutions, instead of merely making media noise.
Last Thursday I contacted the White House with our concerns. On Friday evening, ALPA staff and I met with the TSA to present our members’ serious concerns with AIT screenings and pat-down frisking and, more importantly, to offer solutions to t.... blah blah blah... vague, unverifiable bullsh*t... blah, blah, blah... no real opinion.... blah, blah, blah... keep paying your dues, CREWPass is right around the corner... ...workers and ALPA members including the current security dilemma that we face.
 
Last edited:
Go Lee Moak!!! ASA needs more RJ's!!!
 
Alpa is not going to rock thebus and criticize the policy since they desperatel want crewpass and want the gvmnt/ airlines to pay it

How can alpa represent majors and regionals equally?
Name 3 nonsafety related items that benefits alpa members in praters term? Exactly
Now name 5 items that were against a majority of its members wishes or were never gotten - hell name 10 ( 5 is too easy)
Prater is a joke and alpa is a joke
Age 65
New ft/dt
Hr requirement for airline fos
Crewpass
Gojet
.....'insert ur favorite
 
Alpa is not going to rock thebus and criticize the policy since they desperatel want crewpass and want the gvmnt/ airlines to pay it

How can alpa represent majors and regionals equally?
Name 3 nonsafety related items that benefits alpa members in praters term? Exactly
Now name 5 items that were against a majority of its members wishes or were never gotten - hell name 10 ( 5 is too easy)
Prater is a joke and alpa is a joke
Age 65
New ft/dt
Hr requirement for airline fos
Crewpass
Gojet
.....'insert ur favorite

Thread drift......
ALPO didn't cause GoJet. TSA pilots voting 'no' did. In their defense, they were voting on a horrible contract with an extension. But, secure the planes first.....duh!! Flame away

Back to the topic at hand.
 
Is Lee going to do something about it? Senate now wants to make these things required by 2013: http://blog.seattlepi.com/airlinereporter/archives/214522.asp

If ALPA does not work to get pilots an exemption, then we need a recall election for every executive position. Strongly worded e-mails don't mean squat. What will ultimately have to happen is for every pilot to boycott the scanners, should they become required, shutting down the system until they make an exception for flight crews.
 
Thread drift......
ALPO didn't cause GoJet. TSA pilots voting 'no' did. In their defense, they were voting on a horrible contract with an extension. But, secure the planes first.....duh!! Flame away

Back to the topic at hand.

ALPA is TSA pilots, they are ALPA. Actually what caused gojets was the idiotic scope restriction of AA pilots forcing regionals to start seperate certificates if they wanted to fly 50+ seaters for anyone else. The irony is that Tsa doesn't even fly the AE planes for them anymore yet it completely changed the future for TSA. Most likely will shut down if they can't get anymore 50 seat flying. Too bad.
 
ALPA is TSA pilots, they are ALPA. Actually what caused gojets was the idiotic people, like myself willing to fly, allowing regionals to start seperate certificates if they wanted to fly 50+ seaters for anyone else. The irony is that I'm so stupid I don't realize that is was me that completely changed the future for TSA. Most likely will shut down if they can't get anymore 50 seat flying. Too bad.

At least tell it like it is.




eP.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top