Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Bizzare CFI Arrest Story...Worst FBO Mishap Story Part Deux

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Hi FN,

I have to hand it to you, you seem to have a keen legal eye.

Most people don't understand the distinction between what is right or wrong and what is legal. Additionally you have to consider the fact that the city, county or state procecutors are not going to care if you are a "nice guy" or just "in the wrong place". They are simply looking for a conviction rate for their resume', and most will run over who ever and whom ever to make sure it stays high, and they will use whatever wiggle room in the law to make sure it sticks.

But in cases like the above, I think the zeal is well worth it. There are some really creepy people out there, and the internet seems to have unlocked whatever box these people have been hiding in.

But along the lines of the thread, there was a case a few weeks ago where a high school teaching assistant that was 22 and just out of college got busy with a 18 year old high school student. Apparently they had met outside of the school. Hey, 18 is legal, right? WRONG.

State law in NC states that ANY sex between staff or faculty with a student OF ANY AGE is a felony despite the circumstances.

http://www.citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060414/NEWS01/60413075/1010

Looks like she may wind up with a sex felony rap at 22. Career over.

Nu
 
Last edited:
Three points ...

First ... I will never understand how anyone with enough brains to pass a state drivers license exam could be stupid enough to believe the world is full of nubile young teens who are dying to have sex with fat, hairy, middle-aged men. I mean ... #@$*! They deserve to be locked up just out of sheer stupidity, if nothing else.

Second ... if you're logging into a chatroom URL such as www.teenboysintheshower.com ... you know #@$^ well what's in there, and the cops know #$@& well why you're there, too. You OUGHT to be fair game for the police.

Third, and on a more practical, if slightly distasteful note ... what, in the name of God, does a 30 - 40 year old man want with a child? Where, pray tell, does the sexual attraction to children come from? These guys HAVE to have something miswired in their noggins. What is shocking is that some are parents, and even if they didn't click to the depravity of it, they should at least see the victim as someone else's child and thus be reminded of just how hugely wrong this is.

I knew a guy years ago who served four years in prison for molestation, being charged in the middle of a nasty divorce. His guilt was questioned even by the judge. But these clowns in the links aren't in that situation. They knew full well what the score was, and they made a conscious choice to seek out this kind of thing. No jealous, hurt ex-wives bent on revenge here. They were chasing children with evil intent, and they deserve everything that's coming to them.

If a grown man was chatting up my child on the net, the police would be the least of his worries if I found out where he was. There wouldn't be enough left of him to arrest when I got thru. :crying: :smash:
 
NuGuy said:
I have to hand it to you, you seem to have a keen legal eye.
box these people have been hiding in.

But along the lines of the thread, there was a case a few weeks ago where a high school teaching assistant that was 22 and just out of college got busy with a 18 year old high school student. Apparently they had met outside of the school. Hey, 18 is legal, right? WRONG.

State law in NC states that ANY sex between staff or faculty with a student OF ANY AGE is a felony despite the circumstances.

http://www.citizen-times.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060414/NEWS01/60413075/1010

Looks like she may wind up with a sex felony rap at 22. Career over.

Nu
If I was sitting on this jury and there was any proof whatsoever that the teacher had no clue that the student was enrolled at the school, I'd aquit. Maybe it's time for a jury nullification. If it was ok for O.J. it should be ok in this case.
 
Snakum said:
If a grown man was chatting up my child on the net, the police would be the least of his worries if I found out where he was. There wouldn't be enough left of him to arrest when I got thru. :crying: :smash:
then you'd commit suicide before the big black prison cell mate sexed you up, or would you save society the trouble of a trial and just do the murder, suicide thing? Or would you just live with the cell mate and arm wrestle for the wife position?

Just curious to know if you've thought this thing all the way through.
 
22 year old female does an 18 year old student make, consensual?

Come on, I know a bunch of folks at my high school were boning student/teachers aids.

Big deal?!
 
Last year the lead weather guy from channel 7 in MIA got arrested in Tampa after driving there to meet a 13 year old boy he met on the web. He walked right into the trap.
Weird detail: he transferred a few years earlier from a DC area station where he was let go for reasons that station did not want to discuss.........
 
Way2Broke said:
Wow she is only 18, I wonder if all she did was have sex with a 16 year old.
That's the chick I mentioned a few pages back, the Jenna Simons that brought a cam corder to the orgy her and her friends had with a 19 year old boy. Since her friends were under 16, the law makes her the child pornographer. Pretty neat how that works, she has to register for life now.

Wisconsin law reads, "anyone who has sex with a person who has not yet attained the age of 16 is guilty of a class [whatever] felony". She was 17 when it happend and her girlfriends were under the age of 16. That makes her a child pornographer by filming it.

I wonder if the judge sported a woody when he watched that tape? Wouldn't that be a crime as well?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top