Actually, I think I used phrases like "in my opinion." I also think I said that if you have anything factual to refute what I wrote (post 46) or to back your opinions- post it.
I told you what my opinion was. You're referring to the Age 65 thing as a "boondoggle." So, tell me how is it a "boondoggle?" Where did ALPA go wrong? Are you telling me that the only reason Age 65 came is because ALPA screwed up? You said I have a "lack of understanding of the big picture" (post 45). You said that my pilot group was "screwing up" (post 45). You said that you believe Age 65 "is equal parts over an example of how things should not take place in the future!) (post 47). I'm still waiting to hear about how ALPA caused this "boondoggle," how I have a "lack of understanding of the big picture," how UA ALPA is "screwing up," and how ALPA should have handled Age 65 so that "things (like this) do not take place in the future."
Post away. I'm waiting for you to give me the answers to the above questions so I can have the "big picture" like you do.
Boondoggle: ALPA failed to manage expectations as to how and why it had to change. ALPA excluded the recently retired and that might come back and bite us in the a$$. There is a well organized lawsuit underway by these pilots against ALPA that we don't hear much about right now. The plaintiffs aren't in a hurry because they don't want to end up coming back to fly, they just want the money. Don't believe me? Fine with me.
Age 65 was not handled cleanly enough that you can exclude the possibility that ALPA mgt is lacking credibility. I have no idea why you want to give them a free pass? You seem too willing to buy into the distraction and miss the main issue. Who cares if guys want to work to 65? I'm most concerned that my union cannot inspire the membership to the overall vision. You want cabotage or foriegn control handled just like age 65?
UAL ALPA screwed up by losing that lawsuit. WTF man? That judge was a Clinton appointee and a Democrat. Sorry, you're supposed to be able to win those. No excuses. You wouldn't tolerate that out of my pilot group [CAL]. If it were CAL ALPA that had to stand down to a mgt test run on open skies [Madrid] due to a loss in court you'd have the screw CAL pins out and our MEC in trusteeship.
Edit: Actually, I think I'm starting to figure out your deal. You're happy with how things are going right now, right? As long as you keep getting a paycheck Prater can do whatever he wants. That's called Stockholm syndrom. You might want to look into it.
Last edited: