bobbysamd
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 5,710
Experience
I dunno. I have felt that the MAPD program et al is great because it put people in a 1900 and not jets.
I qualify my next comment by saying that I would have liked nothing better than to captain a 1900. Having said that, isn't a 1900 essentially an overgrown King Air which is an overgrown Baron which is a twin-engined Bonanza? I hope you see my point. The Mesa program was good because it led logically to the 1900. I don't believe a 1900 that hard an airplane to fly compared to other airplanes in its category. and is similar to flying the above-mentioned derivative ancestral recips. An airplane that a 300-hour pilot could fly competently. On the other hand, jets?? A jet could be a lot of airplane for someone with 1000 hours, let alone 300 hours.
Having said that, I recall from my FSI days the Asiana contract program. Asiana is a Korean airline. It sent zero timers to FSI for training, the last part of which, just six months later, was Citation jet training. So much for that argument, though an RJ might be more airplane than a Citation.
It can be argued, legitimately, that 300 hours of the proper training is enough to go to work on the line. My Alitalia guys at FSI would have had about that amount of experience - maybe a little more - before being FOs on the DC-9. But before that they would have received a large amount of enroute experience in the Cheyennes.
Yes, your FO was plenty green at 300 hours and very well would need your help, but not forever. He/she would be sopping up experience on every leg and hopefully would be learning from your excellent example. Pretty soon his/her 300 hours is now 1000 hours, with 700 of that being line experience. Put someone like me next to you and I, too, with 4565 hours, would be green in terms of line flying and perhaps not as good of a sponge. Not for lack of willingness but because of ingrained habits. Experience is the best teacher, but everyone was new at one time. Read Ernest Gann in Fate is the Hunter. If he is to be believed, it sounds like he could barely land a DC-2 during his early days. He learned.
(emphasis added)Originally posted by SDdriver
Hey Bobbysamd,
Do you think though that getting hired at a regional at 300hrs is a good thing? I mean sure it is remarkable to be flying an RJ at 300hrs, but don't you think that this pilot would be denied a lot of really good experience by going that route? I mean do you think a 300hr pilot is really ready for a complex Jet at 300hrs . . .
I dunno. I have felt that the MAPD program et al is great because it put people in a 1900 and not jets.
I qualify my next comment by saying that I would have liked nothing better than to captain a 1900. Having said that, isn't a 1900 essentially an overgrown King Air which is an overgrown Baron which is a twin-engined Bonanza? I hope you see my point. The Mesa program was good because it led logically to the 1900. I don't believe a 1900 that hard an airplane to fly compared to other airplanes in its category. and is similar to flying the above-mentioned derivative ancestral recips. An airplane that a 300-hour pilot could fly competently. On the other hand, jets?? A jet could be a lot of airplane for someone with 1000 hours, let alone 300 hours.
Having said that, I recall from my FSI days the Asiana contract program. Asiana is a Korean airline. It sent zero timers to FSI for training, the last part of which, just six months later, was Citation jet training. So much for that argument, though an RJ might be more airplane than a Citation.
It can be argued, legitimately, that 300 hours of the proper training is enough to go to work on the line. My Alitalia guys at FSI would have had about that amount of experience - maybe a little more - before being FOs on the DC-9. But before that they would have received a large amount of enroute experience in the Cheyennes.
I appreciate that, my friend.I will never forget, I had an FO one time that was a Mesa grad, first job he gets is flying a Transport size turbo prop with me . . . . [H]is problem was when we were real world flying. He couldn't hardly handle flying into a congested airport and dealing with modified procedures such as 200kts to the marker and then shoot the ILS to mins. He had only been taught specific profiles and when those profiles wern't there he was lost, when it didn't work out like back at Mesa under training conditions he couldn't hack it . . . . When I would get an FO that had flown checks in a 210, or instructed in multi and singles, or towed banners or flew traffic, they always had a better sense of how to handle problems in REAL life flying. Just wanted to know what you think, I always respect your views.
Yes, your FO was plenty green at 300 hours and very well would need your help, but not forever. He/she would be sopping up experience on every leg and hopefully would be learning from your excellent example. Pretty soon his/her 300 hours is now 1000 hours, with 700 of that being line experience. Put someone like me next to you and I, too, with 4565 hours, would be green in terms of line flying and perhaps not as good of a sponge. Not for lack of willingness but because of ingrained habits. Experience is the best teacher, but everyone was new at one time. Read Ernest Gann in Fate is the Hunter. If he is to be believed, it sounds like he could barely land a DC-2 during his early days. He learned.
Last edited: