Jet_Driver
"There I was...."
- Joined
- May 5, 2005
- Posts
- 126
After some time and consideration I have come to the conclusion that ORD Controllers are the best I've seen. Why? Here are a few things that went into my conclusions:
DFW: X number of Arrivals, X number of Departures,(these are changing all the time) Standard Taxi routes, a special Queue Frequency so that one guy can sit there all day to do what it takes two transmissions and 5 seconds. All this, and they still can't do it right. It further proves that DFW stands for (D)oesn't (F)riken (W)ork.
ATL: What can I say, Bubba runs the tower. At least they don't need a Queue freq. there. They can't do anything the same two times in a row. This means they are still training controlers, or they refuse to get more efficient.
ORD: 4 arrivals, 1 Departure, No standard Taxi routes. They can launch and trap airplanes in multiple directions. If you screw up something in a taxi instruction, they may get irritated, but they never write you up. These guys at O'Hare have got some cahunas and work their system the most efficiently as I've ever seen. Way to go ORD Controllers.
DFW: X number of Arrivals, X number of Departures,(these are changing all the time) Standard Taxi routes, a special Queue Frequency so that one guy can sit there all day to do what it takes two transmissions and 5 seconds. All this, and they still can't do it right. It further proves that DFW stands for (D)oesn't (F)riken (W)ork.
ATL: What can I say, Bubba runs the tower. At least they don't need a Queue freq. there. They can't do anything the same two times in a row. This means they are still training controlers, or they refuse to get more efficient.
ORD: 4 arrivals, 1 Departure, No standard Taxi routes. They can launch and trap airplanes in multiple directions. If you screw up something in a taxi instruction, they may get irritated, but they never write you up. These guys at O'Hare have got some cahunas and work their system the most efficiently as I've ever seen. Way to go ORD Controllers.