With the runway restrictions you have stated and the fact that you may start operating over water I would definitely recommend a used Falcon 50.
There are a few Falcon 50EXs on the market but are above your budget by a couple of million dollars.
However, there are some used mid-time straight Falcon 50 on the market that would fit well within your budget. I would recommend finding a 50 with the 3-D engines.
It it practically impossible to over gross a Falcon unless you going to be hauling around gold bars. You can literally fill the tanks and have an adult in every seat with normal baggage and still be below maximum gross weight.
While the baggage compartment is not accessible in flight, it is pressurized.
The hourly operational cost is slightly above the other aircraft mentioned in this thread, mainly due to the third engine.
The biggest drawback of the 50 is that it is out of production. However, as the Falcon 900 and the Falcon 200 use the same wing and landing gear components I don't believe the fact of the 50 being out of production will have a major effect.
I have operated a Falcon 50 with 3-D engines and a Falcon 50EX from the Oklahoma City to London numerous times, with one fuel stop. I have done VNY to London in the straight 50, with only one fuel stop.
If you have any questions please send me a PM.
There are a few Falcon 50EXs on the market but are above your budget by a couple of million dollars.
However, there are some used mid-time straight Falcon 50 on the market that would fit well within your budget. I would recommend finding a 50 with the 3-D engines.
It it practically impossible to over gross a Falcon unless you going to be hauling around gold bars. You can literally fill the tanks and have an adult in every seat with normal baggage and still be below maximum gross weight.
While the baggage compartment is not accessible in flight, it is pressurized.
The hourly operational cost is slightly above the other aircraft mentioned in this thread, mainly due to the third engine.
The biggest drawback of the 50 is that it is out of production. However, as the Falcon 900 and the Falcon 200 use the same wing and landing gear components I don't believe the fact of the 50 being out of production will have a major effect.
I have operated a Falcon 50 with 3-D engines and a Falcon 50EX from the Oklahoma City to London numerous times, with one fuel stop. I have done VNY to London in the straight 50, with only one fuel stop.
If you have any questions please send me a PM.