Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Beechcraft Baron!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Grumman guy

Type and Altitude unknown
Joined
Jun 22, 2004
Posts
115
I dont know what it is but, after all the airplanes I have flown (more than a few less than some) nothing puts a smile on my face like the beechcraft baron. I got to fly one today and have not done so for a while and found myself grinning uncontrollably from ear to ear.

Does anybody feel me on this or what?
 
Barons rule! It's God's piston twin.
 
To quote groundpointsix:

The Cessna 414 controls are very heavy, but somehow still very sloppy.

Inversly all beachcraftcraft products seem to be very light, and tight on the controls.
(Like a good woman)
 
Most of my Baron time (1000+ hours) was in a 56TC – the short “55” fuselage with the 380 hp Duke engines – it was a real rocket ship, if not the most fuel efficient airplane in the sky. I also have a few hundred hours in a B55 Barons and a little time in a 58P (Which IMHO wasn’t nearly the airplane the other Barons are.) I’ve never flown a 58 or 58TC, but if they’re ½ as nice as the other Barons they've got to be good machines.

'Sled
 
I got my Multi ni a Baron, woohoooooo!

It flies like a dream, that's all I can say...
 
Grumman guy said:
I dont know what it is but, after all the airplanes I have flown (more than a few less than some) nothing puts a smile on my face like the beechcraft baron. I got to fly one today and have not done so for a while and found myself grinning uncontrollably from ear to ear.

Does anybody feel me on this or what?

Yep....just this afternoon when I took my C340 up for a test drive after it's annual inspection being completed last week.

I took my wife along with me, and she was grinning from ear to ear just watching me act like a little kid at Christmas.

I worried about missing my old bonanza, but I never get tired of flying that airplane, unlike the 414, I find the 340 very responsive and light for the size of the plane.

I've read a few things about the 56TC being hot/fast.
 
The 56TC is the sh$# the fastest production recip twin ever made. My personal favorite is the D55. Best of all worlds. Handles like a 55 with 58 horsies.
 
Grumman guy said:
The 56TC is the sh$# the fastest production recip twin ever made. My personal favorite is the D55. Best of all worlds. Handles like a 55 with 58 horsies.
A straight 55 was just as fast as the 56TC up to about 8,000' or so, but after that there was no contest. To give you some idea of how the airplane performed, the original airframe was basicially the old Beech Travel Air which uses 180 hp Lycs on each wing for a total of 360 hp. The 56TC had 380 hp on each wing! The story goes that Beech used a 55 Baron as a flying test bed for the Duke engine installation. When one of the company executives flew the airplane he had to have one and they ended up building a few.

When I was checked out in the airplane we topped off the tanks, had 4 people on board, and put sandbags in the baggage compartment to bring us up to maximum gross takeoff weight. At that weight, the airplane had about a 500 fpm rate of climb with gear down, full flaps, and a wind-milling engine. It was the closest thing to piston-powered jet performance I've ever seen. The checkpilot had me shut one down in flight and we still were able to true out at around 185 kts. It was faster on one engine than our Aztec was on two.

Oh well, it was fun to fly, but I'd hate to have to pay the fuel bill for it now.

'Sled
 
Out of the 30 or so different makes of airplanes I've flown, the Baron handles better than any of them. Beech nailed the control feel and stability on that design.
 
I am forced to agree. I've got about 100 hours in the C55 model as student and as instructor. I've also got about 600 hours as a 135 PIC and as an instructor in the 58 model. Fast, repsonsive, agile, reliable, and great single engine performance. I like to refer to them as the sports car of aviation, whereas a Navajo would be a minivan and a Caravan would be a Mack truck.
 
I did my multi and initial ATP in the Travel Air, a little before the Baron, and really liked the airplane. Even if it was a little underpowered.

Does anybody feel me on this or what?

I'd really rather not, if it's all the same to you.
 
BE95, the Baron before it was a Baron

avbug said:
I did my multi and initial ATP in the Travel Air, a little before the Baron, and really liked the airplane. Even if it was a little underpowered.

I got about 300 hours instructing in the BE95 travelair, what a beautiful airplane to fly. It was lacking in performance, especially flying in the desert SW, but handled like a dream (even with the big throttles in the middle, inbetween the props and mixtures). Beech definately had the right idea when they put bigger engines on a great airframe and made the Baron.
 
Did my multi in a B55, every time I got in it I got shivers and couldn't stop the sh!t eatin grin that was from ear to ear the entire flight. Greatest plane EVER? possibly! Best sounding engines, always recognizable everywhere, G-d's little rocket ship. I will own one some day. (Unless I can afford a PC-12, but that gets us into the dream plane thread)

Back to the Baron... thank you Beech
 
I couldn't agree more. I flew cargo in old 58's and by far it is my favorite airplane that I have ever flown. The feel of the controls is unmatched, and I love the sound of those engines at idle. I can't wait to own one someday.
 
I really enjoyed flying the BE58 - great control feel and I love the way the cockpit is laid out. But the head room is kind of lacking for me.
 
The BE 56 TC burned about 40 gph in cruise. Around 80 gph for take off!! Fun to fly. Not fun to refuel.

There is so much torque produced that the left main wheel strut is compressed at the start of the takeoff roll, so you are going down the runway listing to the left.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top