Because I'm a nerd, I've been sitting up all night typing out "checklists" and all sorts of useless information to study while I'm home for the next week or two. It occured to me that I should check AWOS at the airport (across the street) because the wx looks like crap. Anyhow, something came over me and I checked airnav.com and found out that there are actually ATIS frequencies that have phone numbers (wow)! So I got the number for OKC and ORD and called. This is what I got...questions to follow
ORD Information G 0956 zulu
Wind 190 at 4
Visibility 6 Mist
Cieling 2,500 Overcast
Temperature 9 Dew Point 7
Altimeter 30.37
Arrivals expect Vectors ILS Runway 14R Approach
Departures expect Runway 27L
OKC Information B 0952 zulu automated observation
Wind 140 at 12
Visibility 1/4
Indefinite Cieling 100 Feet
Temperature 14 Dep Point 14
Altimeter 30.28
ILS Runway 35 R approach in use
Landing and departing runway 17L and runway 17R
...other than the notams (taxiway/runway closures) that was it.
A few things I've come to notice in the past 8 months that maybe you guys (esp. ATCers) could help me out with.
Some ATIS are humans and some are "automated" computer voices. Is there a reason for this? With the computerized ones, do you program it to say what it says or does it get the information off of a METAR or something else? If you don't program it, how does it know what runways/approaches to use?
With the O'Hare ATIS, is there a reason that you would think it is beneficial to have arrivals on 14R and departures on 27L. If my figures are right, that would give arrivals a headwind component of around 3 and a crosswind component of around 3 or 4. Clearly no big deal, but for departures would this not give them a tailwind component? I realize (if the numbers are right on my chart) that it is only 1 knot, but could this make a difference for larger planes?
With the OKC ATIS, they are using ILS 35R and "landing and departing" 17R/L. Okay, I can understand this one. 35R is the only ILS that is Cat II (maybe even III but II for sure - too lazy to look). Is this common then to have a departing runway the exact oposite of the landing runway?
For you ATCers out there, this one is for you:
I've noticed that at "busier" airports (CLE/PIT/Im sure others too) they have an Arrival ATIS and a Departure ATIS. Is there a real benefit to this? I would think the ATIS would have the same information for both arrivals and departures, but I could be wrong. If you are at a facility that does this, is there a specific thing that goes on one vs. the other?
Okay, I think I'm done being nerdy for one night. Thanks for any help/answers y'all can give.
-mini
ORD Information G 0956 zulu
Wind 190 at 4
Visibility 6 Mist
Cieling 2,500 Overcast
Temperature 9 Dew Point 7
Altimeter 30.37
Arrivals expect Vectors ILS Runway 14R Approach
Departures expect Runway 27L
OKC Information B 0952 zulu automated observation
Wind 140 at 12
Visibility 1/4
Indefinite Cieling 100 Feet
Temperature 14 Dep Point 14
Altimeter 30.28
ILS Runway 35 R approach in use
Landing and departing runway 17L and runway 17R
...other than the notams (taxiway/runway closures) that was it.
A few things I've come to notice in the past 8 months that maybe you guys (esp. ATCers) could help me out with.
Some ATIS are humans and some are "automated" computer voices. Is there a reason for this? With the computerized ones, do you program it to say what it says or does it get the information off of a METAR or something else? If you don't program it, how does it know what runways/approaches to use?
With the O'Hare ATIS, is there a reason that you would think it is beneficial to have arrivals on 14R and departures on 27L. If my figures are right, that would give arrivals a headwind component of around 3 and a crosswind component of around 3 or 4. Clearly no big deal, but for departures would this not give them a tailwind component? I realize (if the numbers are right on my chart) that it is only 1 knot, but could this make a difference for larger planes?
With the OKC ATIS, they are using ILS 35R and "landing and departing" 17R/L. Okay, I can understand this one. 35R is the only ILS that is Cat II (maybe even III but II for sure - too lazy to look). Is this common then to have a departing runway the exact oposite of the landing runway?
For you ATCers out there, this one is for you:
I've noticed that at "busier" airports (CLE/PIT/Im sure others too) they have an Arrival ATIS and a Departure ATIS. Is there a real benefit to this? I would think the ATIS would have the same information for both arrivals and departures, but I could be wrong. If you are at a facility that does this, is there a specific thing that goes on one vs. the other?
Okay, I think I'm done being nerdy for one night. Thanks for any help/answers y'all can give.
-mini