Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cardinal;1498233Incidentally said:against[/I] stabilized approaches.
Well, usually when there's a crash and no fire = no gas.
1. They landed it on wet rain soaked grass = not a lot of sparks
2. In a fuel starvation incident, it is astronomically unlikely that BOTH engines would quit at the EXACT same time.
3. Lots of talk about the APU, did it actually start?
The right wing was nearly ripped off? No fuel spillage? Hmmmmm.
Really?
From BBC Website:
"A significant amount of fuel leaked from the aircraft but there was no fire"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/7197506.stm
Ok... Is the BBC reporter a reliable source on aviation technicalities? How much did they actually say?
If that much fuel spilled on the grass those tree hugging Brits would be acting like the Exxon Valdez just parked at Heathrow. Yet you see no large containment or cleanup efforts.
No I didn't say a GEN was deffered, I gave a possible reason for why the APU door was opened as you pointed out.You don't know much about systems do you? Are you a pilot? I'm starting to think you are a poser
Generators stay on line at an N2 setting just bellow ground idle, they will not come off line until the N2's drop bellow this %of N2 wich is much lower than the flight idle setting. If the engines quit, the generators would have being powering the A/T system and the drop of N2 would signal the A/T to add power.(the engines are dead but during this period while the N2's are droping, there is still AC power on the A/C) Once the N2 would drop bellow the ground idle setting (well bellow the flight idle setting.) at that point is when the emergency lights would come on and the APU autostart would kick in.
So now the Gen was deffered Hum?
Lack of fuel Very unlikely. A BA source says the plane landed with more than ten tonnes of fuel, more than normal after a 12-hour flight.