El Cid Av8or
Crew Dawg
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2002
- Posts
- 193
As I posted in another thread that I didn't want to get off-topic...
It is probably a misunderstanding on my part as I haven't researched it thoroughly yet but, I thought that it was more geared towards airline-style flying (i.e Part 121 with dispatchers, etc.). I guess it's kind of like a PhD...everybody has their Masters so the PhD is the next level. I don't mean to stereotype or generalize in saying that but that's about the only comparison I could think of at this moment. Also, I thought that some "entry-level" jobs (those traditionally known for time-building - instructing, freight, pipe-lines, etc) and charter ops frowned upon the ATP. If you have it, they think you're just in there for a while until you get on with the airlines. Now, before anyone jumps to the perception I don't want them to... I am not putting down the freight, instructing, pipe-line, etc jobs. I'll be doing them too and when I do, it will be with pride and respect for the job. I question the experience gained by those who just use these types of jobs as stepping stones without actually gaining anything but hours in the logbook.
---------- end of copy ---------------
What do ya'll think? Is it a "requirement" for a professional flight career? I am heading for the corporate or fractional type of career and I do plan on getting my ATP rating and any other one I can as well. I think adding ratings are great for gaining various types of experience. You never know when a sea-plane rating may come in handy when you're flying over the ocean. Also, they say teaching someone else how to fly will teach you a lot too (or at least help you remember anything you forgot).
Can someone shed a little more light (okay, a lot more) on what the Airline Transport Pilot rating is all about?
It is probably a misunderstanding on my part as I haven't researched it thoroughly yet but, I thought that it was more geared towards airline-style flying (i.e Part 121 with dispatchers, etc.). I guess it's kind of like a PhD...everybody has their Masters so the PhD is the next level. I don't mean to stereotype or generalize in saying that but that's about the only comparison I could think of at this moment. Also, I thought that some "entry-level" jobs (those traditionally known for time-building - instructing, freight, pipe-lines, etc) and charter ops frowned upon the ATP. If you have it, they think you're just in there for a while until you get on with the airlines. Now, before anyone jumps to the perception I don't want them to... I am not putting down the freight, instructing, pipe-line, etc jobs. I'll be doing them too and when I do, it will be with pride and respect for the job. I question the experience gained by those who just use these types of jobs as stepping stones without actually gaining anything but hours in the logbook.
---------- end of copy ---------------
What do ya'll think? Is it a "requirement" for a professional flight career? I am heading for the corporate or fractional type of career and I do plan on getting my ATP rating and any other one I can as well. I think adding ratings are great for gaining various types of experience. You never know when a sea-plane rating may come in handy when you're flying over the ocean. Also, they say teaching someone else how to fly will teach you a lot too (or at least help you remember anything you forgot).
Can someone shed a little more light (okay, a lot more) on what the Airline Transport Pilot rating is all about?