Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MFRskyknight said:I know this won't help much.... but it's gotta be better than Airman.
MFR
dhc8fo said:Bad when hiring is hot, like now (because your instructor still has wet ink on his ticket and won't be much of an instructor with experience).
OK when hiring is stagnet because they are forced to stay instructing where they get some real world flying experience.
350DRIVER said:I second the above, pretty well stated. This is one flight school that I looked at quite a few years ago and glad I stayed away from it. I can't even say that I have recommended one student to attend this school. Your money would be much better spent at a different school. This is a lot of money for what may be or may not be promised, sometimes shortcuts are just that, shortcuts. You could do all plus some at a smaller no name flight school that doesn't take the glossy color ads in monthly publications. I would think long and hard about this one, it didn't take me very long when I looked at the other options that were out there and available.
flydrummer said:What are some of the other options that were available to you?
GAcfi said:350, sent you a Pm and e-mail if your still up, want to chat?
350DRIVER said:The route I took was the Continental Express program in conjunction with San Jacinto college, was actually offered a 1900 ground instructor position in the days of John Dresser before I even completed the program. I did the CFI/CFII at Airman in Norman. I am merely saying that hell would have froze over before I gave ATP's $40,000+ for some "fast track program" which really is not overly relevant due to the lower hiring times that the regionals are requiring present day. You can do the training at a smaller no name mom and pops flight school and end up with the same desired result/outcome at a fraction of the cost.
85 hours of cross country flying you can do at ATP would give you lots of experience with weather and flying in the IFR system.
Almerick07 said:I did my ppl training at Monarch Air at KADS in Addison, TX (dfw area). I spent $4200 on my private, finished it in 35 hours exactly and in about 2 1/2 weeks. They have package deals for all your ratings and they typically hire former students paying $14 an hour....may have changed since last year. Cost of living is pretty cheap in DFW compared to other places if you needed to shack up there for a couple months.
www.monarchair.com
dhc8fo said:The other thing you need to consider with ATP is that you will really only "get" half the time promised. The other half is spent as your flight partner's safety pilot. So make sure the numbers are actual hands on PIC when you are comparing.
350DRIVER said:Phase I
[size=+0]Phase I of the Professional Pilot Program navigates pilots-in-training from zero flight experience to a Commercial Pilot Rating. Utilizing a regimented training syllabus, students are able to progress quickly and economically through their flight training. Phase I is complete when the student has achieved the following:[/size]
[size=+0]190 hours total flight time[/size]
[size=+0]Private Pilot, Airplane Single Engine Land[/size]
[size=+0]Commercial Pilot, Airplane Single Engine Land / Instrument[/size]
[size=+0]Commercial Pilot, Airplane Multi-Engine Land / Instrument [/size]
Phase I Package Cost - $ 24,952.55
The CFI/II can be added to the above> Phase II Package Cost - $ 4,366.40
This is just one example of many, do the research
350DRIVER said:$8,200 for the private course?. Ouch, did this include any fancy extras like a Boise X headset?. Seems like you could have done the same course for $5995 and even that seems a tad high. http://www.flyoft.com/private_pilot.php
The smaller flight schools can offer reduced rates and for the most part are cheaper, substantially cheaper in my opinion due to lower overhead costs, small size of the operation, the setup, etc, etc. I don't personally have the time to compare one school to another school but if cost is not a concern then by all means disregard my previous post and response.
85 hours of flying city to city is not the answer to obtaining the "experience" which really only comes over a period of time.
Take things you read on this board with a grain of salt, opinions are like a$$holes, everyone has one.
good luck in whatever you decide to do
You may want to look into the Mesa Airlines Pilot Development Program (MAPD) if your goal is to get to the airlines, even this 19 month program is cheaper (or was) and most all successful applicants upon completion of this program are hired on by Mesa to fly the CRJ700/900, EMB145, or Dash8. The program works, do a board search, I have attributed much to the subject over the past few years.
I could move to Dallas (or wherever there are cheap FBOs) and _hope_ to find a job there,