chignutsak
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2003
- Posts
- 371
Oh really? Who else might fly the 320? Overseas operators maybe...
Ummmm, most of the world flies the A320. By far the most versatile type to get if you plan on heading overseas.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh really? Who else might fly the 320? Overseas operators maybe...
Ummmm, most of the world flies the A320. By far the most versatile type to get if you plan on heading overseas.
train-ability
The associates degree might be helpful if you are trying for that assistant manager position at Denny's. Otherwise, it's a cop-out cause you couldn't stick it our for a real degree.
If you're going to get a type, get a B737 type. As far as I know, there are no PFT airlines flying buses.
Baseline education. A lot of pilots disagree with this- bc we dont use this logic, but take it as truth. It doesn't matter what pilots think about what it takes to get the job- it matters what the people who will hire you think. The executives-the owners- and ultimately, the customers. From personal experience, executives know pilots are the front line ambassadors and hate it when they run into ignorant pilots in their uniform. It says so many bad things about an airline- and everyone's got em. Executives and mgmt usually have MBAs or JDs and know how hard they worked to get them- they don't like pilots making the money we make without at least the 4-year, or representing their airline in an uneducated way. They want us to have the ability to not only know aviation inside and out- but be able to carry on a conversation on many levels. Right or wrong, good or bad- I know this from direct conversations at several companies.
Ability to learn in a classroom- ability to set goals and COMPLETE them. Mgmt hates wasting money on training pilots, and want as many levels of proof that you'll breeze through training as possible. So your logic is correct- you're just applying it to the wrong goal.
It's a no brainer- watch your money- no reason to overspend- but get a 4 year degree- OR- live with a very large roadblock to your career. Its possible without- but you wont get interviews half as fast and youll have to have a really good reason why you dont have a bachelor's when over 95% of your peers do.
The 320 type is just burning cash and time. Worse yet, it'll look like you're trying to buy your way in. The only type that's justified is the 737 bc of SWA. When recruiters look at type ratings and training classes passed- it's a very different thing to see that someone paid you to train up and then do a job for them while under the pressure of being on probation and can be fired if not up to par- that shows your very real value. Not only did you pass training, but you passed an interview process just to get the chance to go to training. Buying a type has a lot of ulterior motives ($) and really doesn't prove anything other than you paid someone to get you through and they did. See the difference?
Good luck and good on you for trying to differentiate yourself.
wow, are you serious about any of this, crawl out of your cave.
For one, candidates do fail their checkrides at Higher Power, places like that.
"Ignorant pilots in uniform", means what exactly? Uneducated?
"They want us to have the ability to not only know aviation inside and out- but be able to carry on a conversation on many levels."
Wow man, this stuff is really out there. Michael Dell, Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, all buffoons I take it, right?
Yes, getting a bachelors degree is the right path, the right thing to do for this person with out a doubt, let the airline pay for your Type rating and ATP all at the same time, unless it is also required, but to belittle people because they do not have a college education, insane.
What if a pilot, male or female, is raising a child, making a living, earning very little, does that person have the financial ability to pay for college also, maybe not. Whatever job they may have.
yes, the degree is required, but after flying for 10-20 yrs, does getting a degree improve your decision making abilities as an aviator or make you more safe?
Well, there you go. Gringo said it pretty well-
Again, it doesn't matter what you and I think- how flawed we think mgmt logic is- I'm just telling you what their logic IS. Not how I wish it to be.
And Guam- this is no pissing contest- I have good friends who aren't as educated, and yes- they are excellent flyers, but don't hold as good of a conversation with our educated passengers as I would want if I owned or ran the airline. Pilots represent the airline- whether we like it or not- and we should.
It's an argument for our paycheck to be able to stand eye to eye with a doctor, lawyer, artist, or businessman and hold a competent, relevant conversation. We ought to be confidence inspiring on the job bc of who we are.
How we do that is up to us-
The degree and our grades are baselines, like gringo said- boxes to check, like flight time-
You can argue it- but who cares what you, or I think? It quickly becomes "why didn't you?" and when I know men and women, with kids on awful turboprop salaries and schedules who nutted up and willed themselves through when they had every excuse not to- pilots just don't have much of a leg to stand on- why give you a job, when everyone else made the sacrifice.
Same thing with the 1000TPIC
I have good friends who left to job C at 800TPIC, got furloughed and had to start all over again at the regionals bc they didn't have 200 more hours in the left seat- think another few months would make them appreciably better? No- but it is what it is.
You can either accept what is, and give companies no reason NOT to hire you, or get wrapped up in how you think it ought to be. Your choice.