Aspen VFR

[Guitar rocker]

Most certainly we should restrict operations which do not have a slot from using STMP airports when STMP proceedures are in effect...that's exactly what I'm suggesting...because that's the purpose of having STMP proceedures in the first place.

Airports that busy don't need hokel yokel busting into the place to disrupt a program in place. If somene wants in, get with the program, period...or go somewhere else and drive.

This is where we are right now. You don't have to obtain a slot. You can go VFR. The tower does not need to allow you to land, or to admit you to the airport. Considering the frequency of daily operations when STMP is in effect, those wishing to bully their way through the VFR "loophole" really ought to think again, make other plans, and have alternates available...because there's a high probability of needing them.

Sure, I agree, they should make other plans. Kinda like taking the risk and going VFR to BOS when the winds are wippin out of the NW and they are in the 33L/27 configuration. But I just dont think that it's fair to say that if your VFR only (with no instrument rating) that you are in "poor form." Thats all yah can do and it's up to the tower to say yay or nay. Thats all. I agree with everything else that yah said though.

 

[avbug]

That's not all you can do at all. You can exercise some judgement and discretion and go to GJT instead...which is where you have a lot more options available if things do turn sour, than Aspen. One shouldn't even try to break into the system...the proceedures are there for a reason.

 

[g4800xp]

A lot of good points and ideas, the same basic thoughts the airlines use at ORD,JFK,LGA, keep the little bizjets out, they crowd OUR airport. I agree you should get a stmp to arrive in a 172 or a G550 in to ASE, I used to fly there a lot in singles both winter and summer before stmps. But since everyone gets bent over most anything that gets in their way, someone will say that no one should be allowed in under say 100 knots because they slow the system for real airplanes and pilots. As a tax payer funding the system and aircraft operator I should have the right to do what is legal and if I choose to land vfr at an airport that will allow it, I just may. Have you ever been there on winter day wondering why it is not busier? They have made good progress with the system but the frax guys were sucking up the slots and going unused so places like GJT can get swamped and ASE operate under capacity. After the boss has DRIVEN to ASE and passes the airport heading to town and it is now half empty, you can have some explaining to do. I am still with you, get a slot or go elsewhere, but I can not blame a guy for "working" the system to get the mission accomplished if he can do it legally. The guys that chap me are the ones that do that stuff as a rule and is standard operating procedures. I have not landed at a STMP airport under VFR to cheat the system and do not intend to, but I can not honestly say I won't someday.
Before the fire bombs start flying, I fly legal and by the book, follow the rules and believe it is my duty to fit in and flow with the system. But I don't think is a bad idea to have a planA,B.C and so on, on a flight. Knowledge is power. All I wondered in an earlier post was if it was still legal to land vfr at a slot airport, not if it was ethical. We all know it is not ethical, but rolling thru stopsigns, not using a turn signal, speeding, decending ONE FOOT below minimums, figuring out runway performance for a dry runway when it is damp or wet, those things are illegal and or unethical but do you ever do them as well? Just curious.
I am glad to have a job now where i can tell them to just plan GJT not ASE in advance and they say " your the pilot, if you say GJT we go to GJT"

 

[avbug]

We all know it is not ethical, but rolling thru stopsigns, not using a turn signal, speeding, decending ONE FOOT below minimums, figuring out runway performance for a dry runway when it is damp or wet, those things are illegal and or unethical but do you ever do them as well? Just curious.

To satisfy your curiosty...no, I don't do those things.

Yes, I've been into Aspen for years, summer and winter, and no, I don't play the system. You speak about it as though the ATC system is the "man" trying to keep us all down. Sort of an aviation ghettospeak. Got a problem with traffic density...go somewhere else. You can blame the airlines, the fractional operations, ATC...you can blame anyone you want, but this doesn't change the fact that enough of the public use these fields that the traffic density dictates proceedures be placed in effect to safely handle it.

I don't for a minute buy the arguement that you or I or anyone else is a citizen and should therefore demand our rights to use these places despite traffic density. It just doesn't work that way. As a pedestrian citizen you may demand your right of way when crossing the street in front of a speeding eighteen wheeler, too. Or a busy highway...after all, the pedestrian usually has the right of way, just like you have the right to try to get in some place VFR. Of course, most people know that stepping in front of a speeding semi truck, or walking across a busy highway just because one may have the right of way, is stupidity, and wouldn't do it. Hopefully people can use as much sense about ASE, SUN, etc, when the proceedures are in effect.

 

[g4800xp]

I agree with you on all of it Avbug. The system is getting better.
On a nice day, low and slow in a single, there are few places as scenic or demanding as theRockies to fly around.