ASA Hiring, according to Air Inc.

[ASARJMan]

Exactly. While your were responding, you missed my edit. That's why I'll take the 23 year old over the 60+ year old any day.quote]

Care to comment on the rumor going around that you, while supposedly representing ALPA pilots, helped sabatage a LOA that JR wrote regarding ASA pilots nearing/at 60 remaining employed at ASA.

 

[Tarzan]

Care to comment on the rumor going around that you, while supposedly representing ALPA pilots, helped sabatage a LOA that JR wrote regarding ASA pilots nearing/at 60 remaining employed at ASA.

Probably because he knew you were nearing it and wanted you out.

 

[John Pennekamp]

Care to comment on the rumor going around that you, while supposedly representing ALPA pilots, helped sabatage a LOA that JR wrote regarding ASA pilots nearing/at 60 remaining employed at ASA.

You post makes no sense. You must have me confused with someone else.

I have a pretty good idea who you're referring to, maybe you should call him... unless your motive is just public embarassment... in which case, you're an even bigger tool than I thought, MP.

 

[ifly4food]

Care to comment on the rumor going around that you, while supposedly representing ALPA pilots, helped sabatage a LOA that JR wrote regarding ASA pilots nearing/at 60 remaining employed at ASA.

No, John, he doesn't have to call me. He won't anyhow... he's too much of a wus. I'll answer that one right here.

Yes, Mike, I did help to kill it. And I WAS representing ALPA pilots.

As the FIRST OFFICER REP, it was my duty to REPRESENT THE INTERESTS OF THE ATL FIRST OFFICERS, most of which would suffer if the retirement age was raised. Also, if I recall, JR's LOA would have allowed the retirees to come back retroactively, WITH seniority. Most of the MEC actually agreed it was a bad idea.

I find it incredibly dispicable of you to come on here "anonymously" and stir up questions of my personal credibility. Such speaks volumes of yours. And don't be the MEC's little lap dog, yelping at me and trying to bite my ankles because I dare question their negotiation strategy publicly.

Next time you have a legitimate question, grow some balls and question me in a forum where you are man enough to sign your name to the attack.

W. Faruzzi

 

[CFI2766]

Attn Fo's:

Age 65 Is Not Good For Us...

 

[Texx]

mj doesnt process pilots until they are line qualified - until IOE is complete they belong to training - so once again - wrong.

also - according to the head asa IP at FSI last week - no new hire has busted ground school in several years, and only 3 have resigned this entire year for trouble while in training.

he said there has been an increase in extra sim time when guys arent ready for their check on time - but usually one or two. he also said this is no different than the last dozen hiring booms over the last ten years.[/quote]

You might want to ask her. She says she does.

You also might want to talk to the guys doing IOE. I don't think some of them would agree with you on this one either.

Don't shoot the messenger.

 

[79%N1]

Attn Fo's:

Age 65 Is Not Good For Us...

Until you are the one who is 59 and wishes to keep working for a few more years and are perfectly healthy and willing! Then you will be singing a different tune.

 

[John Pennekamp]

Until you are the one who is 59 and wishes to keep working for a few more years and are perfectly healthy and willing! Then you will be singing a different tune.

Right now, the pro 65 crowd is the group that lost their pensions and can't afford to retire.

By the time current FOs approach retirement age, hopefully they will have planned for their own retirement and can afford to retire at a time of their choosing. As do I.

 

[ASARJMan]

As the FIRST OFFICER REP, it was my duty to REPRESENT THE INTERESTS OF THE ATL FIRST OFFICERS, most of which would suffer if the retirement age was raised. Also, if I recall, JR's LOA would have allowed the retirees to come back retroactively, WITH seniority. Most of the MEC actually agreed it was a bad idea.
W. Faruzzi

No wonder you weren't elected Capt's rep. Yep, it's all about you huh WF. Typical young buck without a clue.

 

[John Pennekamp]

No wonder you weren't elected Capt's rep. Yep, it's all about you huh WF. Typical young buck without a clue.

Hey Pearson, guess he didn't bitchslap you hard enough huh? Keep attacking him anonymously if you like, it only makes you look bad. I respect him for having the cajones to stand up for what he believes in.

At least he gave it a run. what have you done lately except attack anyone who dares think outside the box?

Get a life, "Jetdi" dork.

 

[CFI2766]

Until you are the one who is 59 and wishes to keep working for a few more years and are perfectly healthy and willing! Then you will be singing a different tune.

THUS the attention FO tag line...

 

[ASARJMan]

Hey Pearson.

Not Pearson whiny arse. Truth getting to you big bad brave tough guys on flightinfo eh?

 

[doh]

Well SH sent out a memo that said voluntary premium might be gone next month... A bold face lie or an indication that we are getting staffed.

I don't see growth. I think growth at the regionals has topped out. Attrition is where movement is going to come from.

I know we all want to believe that a 200 hour pilot can't do this job. What the airlines are about to discover is that they can. They are eager to please and are trying there hardest. Expect this discovery to bite us in the a$$ in a couple years.

Any yahoo can swing gear. The part about a$$ biting in a couple of years when they upgrade is spot on.

 

[ASARJMan]

Not Pearson whiny arse.

Then again, maybe I am. Or I just might be the walrus, kookookoochew!