Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Asa Emb170?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I have flown on the MDA E170 as a pax and it was a great flight. Comfortable seats, huge windows, enough bin space, two lavatories (front and back) and a "big aircraft" feel to it. Plus, the flight deck looked very spacious and, of course, very automated - wall-to-wall glass with some interesting new features - I think it uses a Primus Epic system. Great flight and very impressive aircraft. Too bad pilots will be paid $30/hr to fly them...
 
asacap said:
maybe DAL will set up an alter-ego company with 190/195's and have mainline fuloughs fly them. I would assume connection pay scales and connection people doing all the other work. I would also assume that connection pilots will be able to go over to the alter-ego company after all furloughs are recalled. This is probably close as we'll get to one list.
Does that mean that you would like a flow-through to the mainline but, failing that, you would be happy to settle for a flow-through to a new subsidiary?
 
jetflyer said:
Fred Butrell said on September 8 in the Comair pilot crew lounge that Delta wanted the Embraer 170/190/195 pretty badly.

He said the product was preferred over the Canadair Jets by management and by customers. He said they were an excellent product and something Delta wanted to have for the future to compete with Jet Blue's future small jets.

He also said they would HAVE TO BE operated by DELTA CONNECTION or else they WOULD NOT be profitable. He said it was the only way they would see a ramp in the portfolio.

Maybe Delta pilots could operate them, but PILOT PAY, MX personnel to work on them, FAs, rampers, catering, and all costs would have to rival a REGIONAL AIRLINE'S. Is this possible? If so then Delta pilots would probably be flying the bad boys.

FRED BUTRELL didn't think it could happen though in the meeting with Comair pilots and FAs.

Good luck to DELTA!!!
Jet

Lots of kool aid. I don't know who they're attractive to with less than 50% reliability according to the guys I've talked to who fly them.

Even with all of the furloughs coming back, DAL doesn't have enough pilots, much less to staff another airline. The worry about bringing the furloughs back and where to put them is being to put to rest. DAL is going to need them at ML.
 
Sorry, but Dean Bloom---the System Chief pilot I believe under Kolshack--said yesterday at a JFK lounge meeting that he would QUIT if ASA or Comair got any 100 seaters. He said he couldn't see them ever getting any. He is Kolshack's right hand man. Kolshack is the DCI CZAR. I don't know about the Emb170.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:
OMG! We don't want Dean to quit now do we! I'm sure that threat will carry weight with GG and Company! C'mon, you can do better than that!

Relax General, ASA was just looking at the plane as it was more than likely on a sales tour and just dropped in to see if Skip would be interested in buying!
 
Freebrd,


I bet Skip would have to go to Kolshack first and ask whether or not he could buy anything. That being said, Dean was probably right. He said only Delta, not DCI, has been present in any talk about 100 seaters, and then he said Delta pilots would be flying them, PERIOD. But hey, maybe Skip wanted to tool around in the EMB-170, I hear it is a nice ride.

As far as who gets what aircraft, I think we have some other important issues to finish prior to anything like that.....


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
It cracks me up that when someone mentions "Jets4Jobs" the DCI pilots have a fit, but when one proposes exactly the same thing without calling it that he immediately gets a few "that's a good idea"s.
 
Swaayze said:
It cracks me up that when someone mentions "Jets4Jobs" the DCI pilots have a fit, but when one proposes exactly the same thing without calling it that he immediately gets a few "that's a good idea"s.
The key word in your statement is "a few". We all have a percentage of our people who just don't "get it".

Also, you might want to note that there is no such thing as "DCI pilots". DCI is a management tool whose main purpose is to play the whipsaw game for Delta. It doesn't hire pilots and it employs no pilots.

DCI (the corporate entity) is not a "friend" to the pilots of any subsidiary or subcontractor carrying pax for Delta Air Lines. A plethora of different companies doing the same job does rquire coordination but its benefit to the parent corporation is highly questionable. The so-called "portfolio" has one principal purpose and that is anti-labor activity, which its founder has "sold" to the DAL BOD as the way to manipulate employees, pit them against each other, and thereby lower costs of labor, while increasing the cost and inefficiency of everything else.

It (DCI) has been successful in creating animosity between the different pilot groups and dividing them against each other because WE the pilots haven't been smart enough to counter the serpent with a little anti-venom of our own. Instead of fighting the "portfolio" with a solid coalition that protects our compensation packages and benefits, we the pilot groups have allowed ourselves to be suckered into fighting among ourselves over scraps and feeling "proud" because we're the "low bidder" in the pack.

I have to congratulate the creator of the portfolio concept. He obviously anticipated our lack of unity and foresight, and has used it effectively against each of us, one at a time. The "formula" of divide and conquer is working, and it's our fault.

Multiple alter egos have always worked to the advantage of corporate management, because WE let it happen that way. Scabs break a strike. Alter egos break a union.
 
Last edited:
General Lee said:
Sorry, but Dean Bloom---the System Chief pilot I believe under Kolshack--said yesterday at a JFK lounge meeting that he would QUIT if ASA or Comair got any 100 seaters. He said he couldn't see them ever getting any.
Isn't that what ATR-DRIVR just said?

ATR-DRIVR said:
IF he did say that it would have been to placate the Comair pilot group and get them to actually think they would get them. Can you say WHIPSAW? ...probably left there and went right over to the DL crew lounge and told them they were looking at the E-190/195's for mainline.
Surplus and ATR nailed it and I lay the responsibility for this disaster directly at the feet of ALPA and the Delta MEC.

Our forefathers in ALPA correctly envisioned this scenario and wrote down the remedy in the By-laws as Merger and Alter ego policy. That policy was rendered toothless in 1998 by ALPA. Subsequently, it was determined that Comair and ASA weren't "operationally integrated" with mainline to the delight of many a Delta line pilot. ALPA thereby became complicite with management in the portfollio concept at Delta. Our own union has put us in a position where new aircraft will be bid on by everybody. Lowballers get the bid. Everyone loses. Some union.
 
Last edited:
That's not correct. If DAL got rid of the CRJ700s, it could replace them with EMB170s. My recollection of DAL scope is that it doesn't exclude the EMB170.



surplus1 said:
Psssst. Worry and speculate not about the EMB170 -- the Delta PWA does not permit ASA or CMR to operate this aircraft type.
 
yes and no

You are right it does not say anything about the EMB170. But that doesnt matter because it does limit the number of seats on any plane regardless of brand of airplane.

71 seat or more is not allowed, at least any more but that is another story.


Medeco
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top