Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ASA CX flights

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You are proving my point. Yes the stage lengths are a big part of the problem. But IN ADDITION, once again the "delivery system" allows the company to squeeze us even more. It gives us the illusion of control while we have none.

Try and look past your "sweet" 4 day schedule blocked at 70 hours and look at the QOL of EVERYONE imcluding reserves.
 
I guess the difference is that you see PBS effencies as the biggest driver in generating the lousy pairings. I believe the major blame lies with the stage length and route structure. The pairings would suck only slightly less under the old line system and we would have no control over how the pairings created a line.

I'll take more control over crappy pairings than less because I think they are going to suck either way.
 
What is it about PBS that you all think makes it easier for the company to hand out pairings like these? I am pretty jr and I got what I asked the system to do. If the pairings had been better I would only have worked 1 4 day the entire month. (vacation) because the trip values were so low I now need to work 2 4 days. I still have 18 days off in a row and crediting 85 hrs.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top