FlyComAirJets said:
What seems to be in question is not who appointed the NMB folks, but rather the President would intervene further down the process trail and either park the process (which would only delay a strike) or impose a settlement (hardly likely, hasn't been done since the Truman era, I believe).
The fact remains...the NMB at the time had 2/3 of its Board members as Democrats and thus, holdovers from the Clinton administration. The NMB was run, at the time, using the decree set forth by the previous administration. The Bush administration's decree has been quite different, as were his appointees to the current NMB. Bush didn't impose a PEB on Comair but Bush was also very new to office and probably had bigger fish to fry at the time.
FlyComAirJets said:
Since the noble pilots of ASA are just hammering out the QOL issues it is difficult to imagine that the NMB would force them to cool their heels for some indefinite period of time. Assuming their requests are reasonable there is no way the NMB would have the grounds to do that. Read ATR Driver's post.
I will go out on a limb here and say that you will see some form of formal recess shortly. We received one at XJT for having demands out of line with reality, according to the NMB. Actually, their words were a lot worse than my paraphrasing. I could go on but I won't. The ASA pilots started negotiations 2 months after we did, in September 2002. 2 years and a few months is fairly normal for a final settlement. They are a long ways away from that unfortunately. I wouldn't underestimate the powers that be up at the NMB by the way...they are capable of just about anything and they control the ASA process far more than most truly realize.
FlyComAirJets said:
Magdolyn Jacobsan(sp?) was "labor friendly?" Excuse me while I throw up.
Sorry, but the <fill in the blank> will never let us strike argument reeks of self-inlicted defeatism. George Sr. wouldn't lift a finger for Eastern, his son wont either. It would probably be an elegant way for the Bush Administration to 'thin the heard' without being seen as an airline killer.
I know all about Ms. Jacobson, including the stories (as told by both sides by the way). Believe me, it has only gotten worse. Much worse. Several years ago, the Board looked at both sides of the issues. Now they have become a "wage control board" in every sense of the term. They care very little for the working man's (or pilot's) plight and very much about the path of least resistance...closing the deal and moving on to the next one...and preventing any sort of worker/management strife, including self-help.
FlyComAirJets said:
Old Maggie, 'labor friendly' hee hee hee. Please tell me you were not within a country mile's distance of the COEx negotiating team.
I never called Maggie (one of the three board members) "labor friendly" but I did call the NMB itself "labor friendly." Perhaps "labor friendly" was stretching it...how about "labor neutral" instead of "anti-labor" which is what they are now. Heck, they seemed "labor friendly" back then compared to what they are now. I have fairly good experiences to back up these statements.
As to your second sentence, I grew up in NY so I have no clue what a "country mile" is.

As to my involvement (or lack thereof), I guess it all depends if you want me to tell the truth or not.
-Neal