WWEfan said:
No more favors. Now I'm not screaming, "BURN THE PLACE DOWN!" Don't do anything illegal or anything that could jeopardize your employment. Just no more favors from this pilot.
I'm not advocating this, I don't practice this, purely for your informaion only. Coming back to Atlanta, about 525 NM out. I started calculating costs/fuel burn during different phases of flight, plan vs. a little faster than plan.
At 350, +8 ISA...
Burn........Mach.......TAS
1920.......0.826.......486
1760.......0.816.......480
1705.......0.812.......478
1670.......0.800.......470
Over the distance (525NM) at the various speeds and using a conservative $1.70/gallon for Jet fuel, the additional cost of flying at .826 versus .80 was $118 for 1 hour 9 minutes versus 1 hour 11 minutes at .80.
Net time saved...2 minutes 20 seconds.
Then while coming into Atlanta I looked at the fuel numbers for Flaps 0 and flaps 8 @ 200 KIAS.
Burn goes from 1200 a side to 1700 a side. Again, using $1.70 per gallon, the additional cost PER MILE, PER ENGINE is $2.20. So, for every MILE that the flaps come out, it costs an additional $4.50 in burn.
I am not advocating the use of ridiuclous burn or early flaps as a tool against the company, but surely some bean counter has to factor the willingness of employees to help save the company money. In one flight alone I could have cost the company an additional $143 in fuel. (Mach 0.82 and 5 miles early on the flaps 8 call). The difference of a 2% pay raise, in the cockpit, per hour is roughly $2.70 ($1 for the FO and $1.7 for CPT).
Imagine 130 airplanes (whatever the actual number is) 4 or 5 times a day. I can't see how holding out can help the company. If they offered a measly 2% raise and some scheduling enhancements, they could ask for and get folks to start thinking about strict fuel savings to help the company.
This is just the pilot side. FAs have their methods of inefficiences, as do the gate agents. They're aware of how they can effect the company and believe me, some of them aren't so efficient.
The point of all this is that employee MORAL CAN EFFECT THE BOTTOM LINE. The bean counters need to pull their collective heads out of their stink holes and factor this in. This company could make millions more a year if 'management' would use the employees as partners, not adversaries, in making the company more profitable.