General Lee
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Posts
- 20,442
Sleepy,
I don't think Delta would have a choice. If they really want more, they would have to spend a little money and it could happen. They still wouldn't be allowed to give any 70 seaters to Skywest or Chataqua without Dalpa's permission. That wouldn't change.
Yes, I want you guys to grow again too, I do. But, I want us to grow with 100 seaters and get some of those furloughs back into cockpits. If Delta only wants to do it with 70 seaters, then I would want them to go there.
ASAPILOT,
I agree it might be alittle expensive, but I am sure Delta would allow our guys to be trained in Flight Safety's sims. They own the contracts, not ASA/COMAIR---because Delta owns them. If they really want ONLY 70 seaters, and not new 100 seaters, then I would want our furloughs to go to the new ones, not the current 57. But, I do not have a say in the matter---at all. As normal, I am just thinking about the guys on the street. I hope we all grow eventually.
Bye Bye--General Lee
I don't think Delta would have a choice. If they really want more, they would have to spend a little money and it could happen. They still wouldn't be allowed to give any 70 seaters to Skywest or Chataqua without Dalpa's permission. That wouldn't change.
Yes, I want you guys to grow again too, I do. But, I want us to grow with 100 seaters and get some of those furloughs back into cockpits. If Delta only wants to do it with 70 seaters, then I would want them to go there.
ASAPILOT,
I agree it might be alittle expensive, but I am sure Delta would allow our guys to be trained in Flight Safety's sims. They own the contracts, not ASA/COMAIR---because Delta owns them. If they really want ONLY 70 seaters, and not new 100 seaters, then I would want our furloughs to go to the new ones, not the current 57. But, I do not have a say in the matter---at all. As normal, I am just thinking about the guys on the street. I hope we all grow eventually.
Bye Bye--General Lee