Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you are correctsad part is even if the company agreed to pay nh's 2nd year pay in lax the union would say no. promise
for the same reason they would not allow voluntary furloughs from the 70 like the company offered....cause it wouldn't be fair to EVERYONE....now be a good little socialist and get back to working for the common ALPA good.Just curious why you think so crjskipper- why would ALPA kill something benaficial like that? I would sincerely hope that they wouldn't do such a thing. Actually, I would hope that they would approach management and ask for the change.
for the same reason they would not allow voluntary furloughs from the 70 like the company offered....cause it wouldn't be fair to EVERYONE....now be a good little socialist and get back to working for the common ALPA good.
It was designed to make the union look bad, basically, because it was something they could not approve in its current form.
quote]ALPA needs no help at all doing that.
VeeOne how did that displacement on the 70 go.
As for the hypothetical situation involving extra pay for LAX crewmembers... no other airline does it, and I don't see management offering it. Nothing to see here, move along.
It was designed to make the union look bad, basically, because it was something they could not approve in its current form.
quote]ALPA needs no help at all doing that.
So why don't YOU do something about it and get involved with ALPA! Why don't you voice your opinions at Monday's LEC meeting, 10am, at the Doubletree Hotel. Should be a good one. The Fab 4 will be there, and I'm almost positive Joey will be there too tagging along with his older girlfriend.
VOTED IN FAVOR!
sad part is even if the company agreed to pay nh's 2nd year pay in lax the union would say no. promise