Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ARW TA?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Blueridger,

Just got home from ORD and DEN. I had an opportunity to speak with several of our pilots and most feel as I do about this TA, 8ys a no can do. That would mean 10yrs under this contract and most of us are unwilling to do that. I am all for helping out the company with a SLIGHT reduction in pay, the operative word here being SLIGHT this due the b itch for hire airline (mesa) but there are several issues in this TA that would have to be changed to get my and many of our brothers and sisters on the property to vote it in.

WD.
 
Whiskey Dude, and BlueRidger,

do you guys have separate pay rates for 70-90 seats in your contract already, or are they currently under negotiation? For AirWisc....do those rates fall under the BAC pay scale??? Also...thanks to the great AirWisc crew that gave me a ride the other day...true professionals!!!

mookie:o
 
Mookie,

In this TA that is being proposed there is a seperate scale for the 70 seat RJ however, we have none and there has been no talk outside of rumors about getting them and even if we did there is a four yr back log on the a/c so for all intensive purposes in my opinion it was nothing more than a ploy to help get this TA passed.

Glad to see that we took good care of you on your trip but really that's no suprise because AWAC and it's pilot group are truly professionals.

WD.
 
Mookie,
The 70 seat rate is actually our current 50 seat rate. They gave back the 7% cut for 70 seat drivers. As it was explained, the rate was so that the other ALPA regional carriers that are in negotiations would have a basis for negotiation in their current talks.
 
Beechnut said:
This seems to be a point that I must be missing. I've heard the argument before "WE are not losing money, United is!" Well, the way I see it, we are only making money because our biggest customer, UAL, is still paying us. Our biggest customer has just filed CH11 because it CANNOT pay us (along with others). We must lower our cost so that our biggest customer, again: UAL, can return to profitability so that we can continue to be profitable.
S.

Thank you for your observations. Here's the next dumb question.

Do you actually believe that if AWAC pilots decided to fly for free, it would have any real and material impact on the survival of United Airlines or its ability to recover from bankruptcy?

In case you do, on what basis did you arrive at that conclusion?
 
Group,

I guess my next question would be directed towards the SkyWest pilots. I understand MGMT already imposed a concessionary package...which is not surprising, since there are no union safeguards. Our MEC is meeting tomorrow to discuss the nuances of the ARW TA. It is becoming clear, at least to me, that any pilot action at ACA and ARW would occur after each company's bids are submitted to Bain. This is a positive development as it increases leverage to the negotiating committees. I presume that there will be some tweaking involved after the fact. FYI, each of the seven companies has received 10-day extensions from Bain.

I give our team credit...they are exercising their due diligence on this matter. The way I see it, we should avoid a knee jerk TA (no offense meant to ARW...as they may be in a different financial state) as ACA is still profitable & has over $200M in unleveraged cash on hand. But I’m sure we will see something within the next couple of weeks.

Blueridgeflyer
 
As for the 70 seat CRJ...we have no provision for those. Obviously, MGMT is playing this card in the negotiation, but the aforementioned backlog at Bombardier makes this vaporware. Frankly, I am in no mood to entertain thoughts of neutering our contract for the sake of 20 additional seats.

Blueridgeflyer
 
Blueridge,

The only concessions have been no pay for newhires while in training, however the top 3 execs all did take a pay cut. We have heard that pay cuts are coming in the form of a pay proposal for the same pay to fly the 50 & 90 seat RJ's. Whether or not that will pass is beyond me.

BTW I sense that you feel that we are a not that great because we don't have any "union safegaurds" hmm.............I can see those safegaurds have worked well for MESA & all the other union carriers who have furloughed. While I think our SAPA is a joke I fail to see how a union would help us as much as a threat of a union does.

SkyWest has yet to furlough 1 pilot in their 30 year history.
 
Jeepman,

Not at all sir! You guys are a 1st rate operation all the way. Not knowing the intricate details of SAPA, I am guessing that you have some form of limited control over compensation? Please educate us on how this works. IMHO, ALPA national needs to step in on the UEX matter on behalf of ACA & ARW. I would like to see a well orchestrated public relation campaign launched.

Blueridgeflyer
 
The TA is a POS. I've read it and it will cost me over 800 a month by august 2005. The 7% and 9% paycuts are for this past years rates. All the step increases in our current contract are gone. Just take the previous rates, cut them 7% and add 1.5% each year to each year of serevice.

As an crj fo, it will be a 7% cut now, goes to 10% of what I would have made in august, and up from there.

Not to mention weakening of work rules (back to 16 hour duty days, rigs changed), paying twice what we are now for insurance, cut in retirement, cut in per diem, cut in vacation pay, 8 year duration. No chance to get back what we gave up when things change. NO FREAKIN WAY!

I cannot believe our MEC signed off on this one. Perhaps it had something to do with the haste in which management forced them to come up with something, I don't know. I am willing to bet my job that our management will renegoiate when we vote no on this.

RR
 
Whiskey drivers--
So what are you guys hearing on the line? It seemed like this board was full of mesa guys talking trash about their TA and then it passed by 70+%. I know at pdt everyone was pissed but we agreed to concessions by a wide margin (scared of being replaced by Mesa). Do you think this will pass? It seems like we (pilots) have lost so many battles lately it would be great if we could win one...
 
On a side note I just learned that Tilton is using his expense account to cover his $18,000/PER MONTH condo! I guess all the hard work that he has put into UAL's recovery plan warrants such excess.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top