johnsonrod
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2006
- Posts
- 4,218
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Total BS.
DAL would never do it. It would cost the corporation a ton of money that they would not have to spend if it was legislated. Much easier to have a government force it upon airline workers than to have a corporate policy that you would have to pay for.
Commuting is Pandora's Box, and I do not think anyone wants to open it. I truly feel ppl would leave in groves.
Total BS.
DAL would never do it. It would cost the corporation a ton of money that they would not have to spend if it was legislated. Much easier to have a government force it upon airline workers than to have a corporate policy that you would have to pay for.
Commuting is Pandora's Box, and I do not think anyone wants to open it. I truly feel ppl would leave in groves.
Isn't it "leave in droves"? Just sayin....
What? Did they have to do the following as per FullofLuv?
purchase my home and cover it if I'm upside down, pay for the move, explain to my wife and kids about losing their friends and family support, give me a cost of living increase to adjust for any increase in new living cost, cover my wife's loss of salary and longevity until she can replace it, pay for my divorce, and give me positive space to visit friends and family...The list goes on and on...
The federal civil service buys your house if you can't sell it. (no such luck for the military). A company would not have to require you to move to domicile. What if they took away jump seat privileges? They could claim that federal law required them to do it to be in compliance with the new rest rules.