Clownpilot - Part 2 of 2
When you say "more for us is less for them", I disagree. You are making the same mistake again. More for you is NOT less for us. The more airplanes you buy and operate the greater the need for aircraft of our type, not a reduction but an increase. When we add more small jets, you gain more passengers to keep your big airplanes flying and eventually to allow you to buy more or even bigger airplanes. It's not one-for-one (the size difference is too great) but it is a benefit to you, not a negative.
We want you to have more so that there will be more need for what we do. You should want more of us, for the very same reason.
Instead, you have embraced the totally unsubstantiated myth that we are taking your flying. You then respond with ever-increasing Scope that, if you had your way, would put us out of business completely. You blindly refuse to recognize that IF you succeed, the number of your aircraft will soon begin to shrink and you will lose jobs to more furloughs.
I believe your thinkers know this full well. You are afraid of the RJ not because it is causing you to lose work, but because you think it will lower your wage base. So your leaders have decided to create the job loss myth in an effort to block the proliferation of the Regional Jet. You have failed to do that with Plan A =(wait and see if it fails to work), so you shifted to Plan B =(Scope the d***ed things out of existence). Plan B doesn't work as the corporation finds ever-increasing methods of circumventing your Scope. Now you want to combine Plan B with the new Plan C =(Transfer all the jets to your list). "We can't stop it so we'll just take it."
Well, unfortunately we happen to be flying those little jets. If you succeed with Plans B and C, it will be at our expense. We'll all be unemployed while you play with our undesirable equipment.
We are not the one's that created the outsourcing window in your original Scope, YOU DID. Now, after the fact, you've changed your mind and you want to put the Genie back in the bottle. The methods you have chosen also destroy our livelihood in the process. That may be OK for you, but it sure isn't OK for us and we have no choice but to fight you every inch of the way.
My thought has always been to preserve the premo major job and not give it up to create more less desirable jobs. To that end I believe we need to revisit the flowthrough provisions. If we can make the commuter job a reasonable step to the attainment of the major job, we could convince the guys there that it is a worthwhile effort to keep the flying primarily in the mainline. That way they'll know there gonna have a good job when they get there. Right now, I think much of the frustration come from seeing no good path to that end Having said that, for now the feed must remain separate and must be controlled. .
None of those thoughts are "bad" thoughts but they ARE erroneous thoughts. Why? Because they are all predicated on the false premise that our operations result in the loss of your jobs.
The better jobs at the majors will continue to be there and there will be MORE of them because of what we do, not less. I'm not against moving our flying to the mainline, but you must understand that means our pilots must move with the flying. The corporation simply isn't going to agree to do that in the conventional manner. It would take a new and very creative plan to convince them to do that. The APA proposal isn't even close to being that.
I wish you could tell me WHY you believe that the "premo major job" is given up to create more less desirable jobs. That just isn't happening. As long as you keep the "premo job" (as you call it), why do you care if there are more of the less desirable jobs?
It has NO negative effect on you. Why do you care if these undesirable jobs get more desirable? That also has no negative effect on your prime job. On the contrary, it makes your prime job more secure.
Flow-through is a placebo that has no purpose of benefit to regional pilots in its know formats. The ONLY type of flow-through that makes any sense is one that "flows" ALL affiliated regional pilots to your list in order of their seniority and that precludes any off the street hiring or mergers from reducing or interrupting the flow. No ratios with "off the street new hires." If I flow up to the bottom, you do NOT flow back into the left seat. That can never work. The only good flow is a merged list and the company is not going to agree to that. YOU guys have given them every reason not to.
This is the part I don't understand. We're fighting to preserve our futures as you are. We are really not your enemy. But our solution to this problem is different than yours I guess. We know that attempting to get management to increase their costs by combining our groups is unrealistic. Our best path is to fight to preserve the flying we have and prevent them from outsourcing what was ours to begin with. AE exists because of a granted exception to our contract that clearly states "all AA flying will be performed by pilots on the AA seniority list." We fight for what is ours, not against you. BTW, I know that DAL is different.
I want you to understand, desperately. I do NOT want to become your enemy and I do not want you to become my enemy. Your solution to the problem is different from mine, yes. That is because I sincerely believe that your solutions are designed to solve a perceived problem that does not exist. Therefore, your solutions are completely unnecessary. Your decision to joust at windmills does not justify my demise.
It is true that ALL of the AA flying was originally yours. ALL of the DAL flying was originally there's. Both of you (and all other mainline carriers) created an exception by exempting certain types of that flying. You gave up the control that you had. It was not taken or forced from you. You relinquished it for the asking because you did not want it. That started more than 20 years ago. Our companies came into existence. They entered into agreements with or were acquired by your Company, within the guidelines that YOU established. As time progressed, the quality of our equipment improved but
it remained within the parameters that you ceded.
The only thing that we have done that might be called "different" is put the propeller inside the cowling. When it was first done, you raised no objections, thereby ceding it to us for the second time. Now 10 years later, ten years during which we have played the game by YOUR rules, you come along and declare that you wish to change the rules. Had you done that before we were already established, I personally could buy it (I happen to believe that an exception to Scope was a total lack of foresight and a huge error).
When you arbitrarily decide to change the rules each time you go to the bargaining table we have a problem. Your desired new rules, destroy my life. I'm sympathetic to the fact that you perceive you made a mistake, but I am completely unwilling to allow you to destroy me in an effort to fix your perceived error. I can never agree to that, unless you can provide for my needs. Unfortunately, you can't.
I insist that we are not hurting you, no matter how many 70-seat or smaller jets we fly or how many miles we fly them. I'm not expecting you to simply accept my opinion. The facts are there to substantiate my allegation. Just look at the number of passengers required to break even in a RJ compared to the same number in the smallest mainline aircraft. You cannot improve your life by forcing the company to operate unprofitable equipment. The management of the airline is not trying to intentionally destroy its core business by buying regional jets. They are trying to make money and that is their purpose in life.
I hope some of this has helped you to understand our perspective and maybe broaden your own. I reiterate once more, I don't want an enemy I want a brother. I just can't accept a brother who will take from me because he thinks I pose a threat that he merely imagines.
Finally, when the union that I pay to represent my interests openly supports, aids and abets, my brother's attempt to destroy my life my only recourse is to seek the assistance of an impartial judge. That is exactly why a lawsuit has been filed and will be pursued until the hegemony stops or the judge decides in our favor. If we cannot achieve justice in the courts, it will end the litigation and probably the brotherhood with it.
Best regards, and Fly Safe.