TIS
Wing, Nosewheel, Whatever
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2001
- Posts
- 366
As some of you may be aware, I've got more than a few things to say about the subject of incursions. I'm just interested in who has actually been involved in one, how serious it was and how it all turned out in the end.
My view is that even with the 2002 statistics showing dramaitic improvement in the incursion rate trend, there is MUCH more room for improvement. Those same statistics show that PILOTS cause 58% of all incursions! That's about twice as many as either of the other two origins (controllers and vehicles/pedestrians).
The FAA is investing HUUUGE amounts of money in technological "Decision support" technology for controllers in the form of ground based radar systems such as AMASS and ASDE-X, but is paying almost NO attention to the number ONE cause of incursions - PILOTS WHO MAKE MISTAKES BECAUSE THEY CAN'T SEE THE PROBLEM COMING. AMASS only reached high levels of operational deployment in July of this year, by the way. In addition, every controller I've talked to who uses it sings its praises but adds somewhat furtively that these kinds of technologies add to controller workload - sometimes when THAT is needed least.
The improvement in the statistics can only be due to a combination of improved and heightened awareness by pilots through education, the SINGLE MOST completely implemented part of the FAA's plan to reduce incursions, and a SIGNIFICANT reduction in air traffic that continues to result from downsizing efforts at the airlines.
The latter we have little control over, but the former we can grab by the horns and run with. There is a LOT to know about the incursion risks we all face without realizing it each time we get anywhere near a runway. Incursions happen, after all, because no one realizes the situation they're in until the problem has already occurred and they certainly aren't intentional. It must, therefore, follow that making the transparent hazards that exist more readily identifiable to those playing the game is a key component of reducing the number and thus, the rate of incursions overall. This can only happen through pilot education.
Imagine, if we could get pilots to simply stop making the mistakes that cause incursions we would witness a 60% drop in the number of incursions. No other mitigation scheme or safety policy can make that claim. We bear the greatest burden in fixing the problem because we create the lion's share of it.
Hoping to get some good commentary here. Please share your stories/insights!
TIS
My view is that even with the 2002 statistics showing dramaitic improvement in the incursion rate trend, there is MUCH more room for improvement. Those same statistics show that PILOTS cause 58% of all incursions! That's about twice as many as either of the other two origins (controllers and vehicles/pedestrians).
The FAA is investing HUUUGE amounts of money in technological "Decision support" technology for controllers in the form of ground based radar systems such as AMASS and ASDE-X, but is paying almost NO attention to the number ONE cause of incursions - PILOTS WHO MAKE MISTAKES BECAUSE THEY CAN'T SEE THE PROBLEM COMING. AMASS only reached high levels of operational deployment in July of this year, by the way. In addition, every controller I've talked to who uses it sings its praises but adds somewhat furtively that these kinds of technologies add to controller workload - sometimes when THAT is needed least.
The improvement in the statistics can only be due to a combination of improved and heightened awareness by pilots through education, the SINGLE MOST completely implemented part of the FAA's plan to reduce incursions, and a SIGNIFICANT reduction in air traffic that continues to result from downsizing efforts at the airlines.
The latter we have little control over, but the former we can grab by the horns and run with. There is a LOT to know about the incursion risks we all face without realizing it each time we get anywhere near a runway. Incursions happen, after all, because no one realizes the situation they're in until the problem has already occurred and they certainly aren't intentional. It must, therefore, follow that making the transparent hazards that exist more readily identifiable to those playing the game is a key component of reducing the number and thus, the rate of incursions overall. This can only happen through pilot education.
Imagine, if we could get pilots to simply stop making the mistakes that cause incursions we would witness a 60% drop in the number of incursions. No other mitigation scheme or safety policy can make that claim. We bear the greatest burden in fixing the problem because we create the lion's share of it.
Hoping to get some good commentary here. Please share your stories/insights!
TIS