YourNameHere
REMOVE BEFORE FLIGHT
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2005
- Posts
- 99
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ReverseSensing said:Here's the link.
AIM 4-1-9
g. Self-Announce Position and/or Intentions
1. General.
Pilots stating, "Traffic in the area, please advise" is not a recognized Self-Announce Position and/or Intention phrase and should not be used under any condition.
paulsalem said:Well That settles that issue.
paulsalem said:My post is in regaurd to Any Trafic in the Area please advise.
AC560 said:Apologize for the confusion on my part then, I took your comments of:
1) If you listen for traffic in the area you'll get answers to both "any traffic in the area..." and "what's the active runway".
2) I really don't think there can be an "active runway" becuase its uncontrolled, and there is no on offical to designate and active runway.
To indiciate otherwise, safe flights and God Bless Benny Hill.
Just meet him on 123.45 and dicker with him on what runway is going to be the "active" and what runway is going to be the "secondary active".paulsalem said:Oh I see. You too. I won't hit you if you dont' hit me!
FN FAL said:Just meet him on 123.45 and dicker with him on what runway is going to be the "active" and what runway is going to be the "secondary active".
A Squared said:Yeah, I knew that would get your attention. It was brought to my attention that the newest revision of the AIM specifically states that the phrase: "Any traffic in the area, please, advise." is bad and should not be used (4-1-9 (g)(1).
SO, that should settle it, right? Discuss.
Just for the record, I don't have strong feelings about the issue, I don't use the phrase, but neither does it make my blood boil to hear somone else use it. But I know that it is a matter of great interest to some.
A Squared said:SO? Discuss.
I would venture that even if you were at the only airport on that frequency and used "this effective technique of soliciting reports", and all 3 of the airplanes on downwind decided to advise all at once, you'd STILL have frequency congestion.UndauntedFlyer said:The problem here with "Any traffic in the area please advise" is only that of frequency congestion. The solution, in my opinion, is not to stop this effective technique of soliciting reports of pilots that pose a potential collision hazard, the solution to the problem should be to simply add more frequencies. 122.7, 122.8, 122.9 & 123.0 are just not enough in busy areas. What about quarter spacing all of those frequencies?