I apologize, in advance, if this is not 100% accurate.
In the late 1980s/early 1990s, a Jetstream International pilot reported for work under the influence. He called in, told scheduling he was running late because of a flat tire, and said he would be in for his next scheduled departure from DAY (his domicile). Another first officer was assigned to fly the first two legs of his duty period.
After arriving at the airplane, the captain noticed nothing wrong with this pilot. At the out station, another employee smelled something on the first officer's breath and reported it. However, the flight departed as scheduled. In DAY, the flight was met and both pilots were removed from duty.
The FAA went after the first officer and the captain! The reason was the captain should never have allowed the first officer to fly. While technically correct, the captain stated, many times, he never smelled any alcohol, and did not observe any behavior indicating the first officer was intoxicated. It took a long time, but the captain evetually won his job back, thanks to ALPA (by the way, ALPA did exactly what they were supposed to do in this case!).
The captain's position was he had a lousy sense of smell. If I recall the story accurately, he spent a lot of his own money to demonstrate this lousy sense of smell. A captain may not always be able to smell alcohol. I'm not certain I could unles the first officer was exhaling right in my face.
In the late 1980s/early 1990s, a Jetstream International pilot reported for work under the influence. He called in, told scheduling he was running late because of a flat tire, and said he would be in for his next scheduled departure from DAY (his domicile). Another first officer was assigned to fly the first two legs of his duty period.
After arriving at the airplane, the captain noticed nothing wrong with this pilot. At the out station, another employee smelled something on the first officer's breath and reported it. However, the flight departed as scheduled. In DAY, the flight was met and both pilots were removed from duty.
The FAA went after the first officer and the captain! The reason was the captain should never have allowed the first officer to fly. While technically correct, the captain stated, many times, he never smelled any alcohol, and did not observe any behavior indicating the first officer was intoxicated. It took a long time, but the captain evetually won his job back, thanks to ALPA (by the way, ALPA did exactly what they were supposed to do in this case!).
The captain's position was he had a lousy sense of smell. If I recall the story accurately, he spent a lot of his own money to demonstrate this lousy sense of smell. A captain may not always be able to smell alcohol. I'm not certain I could unles the first officer was exhaling right in my face.