Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

AMR to purchase USair Shuttle

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
AAflyer said:
Because it is uncomfortable for the passengers you A$$.. Keep flying your RJ at peanuts so mainline can keep shrinking.

Tell you what, how about you run over to Go Jets and get a quick upgrade..

Nimrod...

AA



AAflyer said:
Eagle lost money, take a look at the SEC filings, even a 3rd grader can read it. To summarize my paycut is subsidizing the fleet of RJs.

As for working for peanuts in my day, pretty sad I made the same amount on the SF-340 about 10 years ago the RJ fos make today.

Douchebag.

AA


AAliar,

Do a big favor for all of us and calm down and take a deep breath before you post. Nobody likes the state of the aviation industry right now. Here is link that might help also:

http://gorillamask.net/postingandyou.shtml
 
To get back to the subject...

.....the point being, AMR was interested in the shuttle and was poised to get it during the UAL/US merger talks. Many things in the industry have changed, but if AMR were interested in the shuttle then, they most likely will be interested now. They already had the AE shuttle then as well.
 
AAflyer said:
Eagle lost money, take a look at the SEC filings, even a 3rd grader can read it. To summarize my paycut is subsidizing the fleet of RJs.

As for working for peanuts in my day, pretty sad I made the same amount on the SF-340 about 10 years ago the RJ fos make today.

Douchebag.

AA

you must be one of the BEST pilots in the world. you yell at me about passenger comfort yet leave the APU off until 10min prior to departure when the ramp is 100deg in DFW.

anyways ignore the crux of my post. why are fellow AA members stabbing their fellow APA "brothers" in the back and continually pick up open time while 3,000 are on the street?

yes we regionals are simply an extension of what YOU mainliners did in the 80's with B scales. we are now simply the D scales being employed. as far as eagle not making money you are correct, however if fuel wasn't so hi i think both AA and AE would be making money.
 
It may not be a choice.

TheDonger said:
US Airways/America West is NOT getting rid of the Shuttle. Give it up guys.

Of course they don't want to give it up, but it may depend on what the DOJ and SEC have to say about it. This is a different animal than the UAL/US merger proposal, but it is up to big G.
 
Jeff Helgeson said:
.....the point being, AMR was interested in the shuttle and was poised to get it during the UAL/US merger talks. Many things in the industry have changed, but if AMR were interested in the shuttle then, they most likely will be interested now. They already had the AE shuttle then as well.
.

Actually they were not going to get the Shuttle in its entirety. AMR and UAL/U would have "split" the the operation. AMR would have got a few gates and DCA/LGA slots. The Shuttle would have looked like more of an every hour operation.
 
Yes, and more details...

B6Busdriver said:
.

Actually they were not going to get the Shuttle in its entirety. AMR and UAL/U would have "split" the the operation. AMR would have got a few gates and DCA/LGA slots. The Shuttle would have looked like more of an every hour operation.

I believe you are correct, but nobody can say how exactly the deal would have turned out. I think it would have worked out to be shuttle service every 1/2 hour as the various carriers were to spread out their times; one at the top of the hour and another at the bottom of the hour. It probably would have worked out better for they flying public that way.

Again, the main point is AMR was interested then, and may still be interested now, if made available.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom