time builder
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2005
- Posts
- 648
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone in the know? I heard a rumor that AMF was trying to put smaller than standard engines on the BE 1900.
They put money in our check for those charts. Don't believe me just ask'em. I asked during the winter meeting. I don't know if anything pisses me off more than thinking about that.Im sure that even if it could be approved, it would cost more to get the STC or whatever approved than they would save by not using the standard engines. Of course Im sure they spent thousands getting that BS expemption from having to supply their flight crews with jepp charts. Anyways...Im sure that rumour about the engines is a load of crap. They are freight planes, the amount of useful load it would cost to put a smaller engine on the 1900 would make it useless for hauling anything but styrofoam peanuts. Now what you heard was probably some distortion of a new policy about using reduced thrust or a lower company mandated power setting.
Or, you could get the Jepp subscription that AMF pilots are required to get for roughly $300 a year.You have to buy your own charts! That's total BS! We use NOS, but I'd bet that with all the charts I carry it would run about $150 every 2 months if I was to buy them from one of the local FBO's.
Anyone in the know? I heard a rumor that AMF was trying to put smaller than standard engines on the BE 1900.
Or, you could get the Jepp subscription that AMF pilots are required to get for roughly $300 a year.
What's more annoying regarding the chart issue is the fact that Lear, CVG, DFW, and San Juan crews have company charts in the aircraft! So should they get a $300/yr pay cut?They put money in our check for those charts. Don't believe me just ask'em. I asked during the winter meeting. I don't know if anything pisses me off more than thinking about that.