bobbysamd
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 5,710
Upset examiners
Before Riddle pushed for reinstatement of self-examining authority, the school used the three examiners on the field for students' practical exams. These examiners had a monopoly. They probably earned most of their income off ERAU students. They knew it and abused it, as witnessed by an inordinate number of failures.
I say inordinate for two reasons:
(1) In those days there was nothing more unreasonable in the world than an ERAU stage check. These stage checks were tough (and often unrealistic and immature), but the rationale was that if one could pass an ERAU inquisition one could pass an FAA practical, as proven by
(2) the pass rate shooting up dramatically when the school sent students to non-PRC examiners.
Either way, the PRC examiners lost business, first, by the school sending students elsewhere, and, second, when self-examining authority obviated the need for examiners. These DuPage examiners found themselves in the same boat and, in this Flyers investigation, have found something on which to hang their hats.
The point of it all is there's more than meets the eye than allegations of substandard students and phonied-up paperwork. Axes are being ground. I seriously doubt the DEs on the Flyers' field are going on a safety crusade only.
On the other hand, given my experiences, I wouldn't be surprised if there is at least a little truth to the certificate issuance irregularities. I remember at ERAU how it was felt that while some students were marginal no harm was perceved in issuing them a Private. School officials knew the student would continue training at the school under controlled circumstances and rationalized the student might improve by the time he/she was eligible for his/her Commercial. The Flyers situation appears to be similar. In either case, it was absolutely wrong. That puts the certificates of the instructors who trains these individuals and the stage check pilot on the line, and is a safety and deception issue.
Before Riddle pushed for reinstatement of self-examining authority, the school used the three examiners on the field for students' practical exams. These examiners had a monopoly. They probably earned most of their income off ERAU students. They knew it and abused it, as witnessed by an inordinate number of failures.
I say inordinate for two reasons:
(1) In those days there was nothing more unreasonable in the world than an ERAU stage check. These stage checks were tough (and often unrealistic and immature), but the rationale was that if one could pass an ERAU inquisition one could pass an FAA practical, as proven by
(2) the pass rate shooting up dramatically when the school sent students to non-PRC examiners.
Either way, the PRC examiners lost business, first, by the school sending students elsewhere, and, second, when self-examining authority obviated the need for examiners. These DuPage examiners found themselves in the same boat and, in this Flyers investigation, have found something on which to hang their hats.
The point of it all is there's more than meets the eye than allegations of substandard students and phonied-up paperwork. Axes are being ground. I seriously doubt the DEs on the Flyers' field are going on a safety crusade only.
On the other hand, given my experiences, I wouldn't be surprised if there is at least a little truth to the certificate issuance irregularities. I remember at ERAU how it was felt that while some students were marginal no harm was perceved in issuing them a Private. School officials knew the student would continue training at the school under controlled circumstances and rationalized the student might improve by the time he/she was eligible for his/her Commercial. The Flyers situation appears to be similar. In either case, it was absolutely wrong. That puts the certificates of the instructors who trains these individuals and the stage check pilot on the line, and is a safety and deception issue.
Last edited:
