FoxHunter
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2002
- Posts
- 679
But how will they get top talent without top pay. You point out Ina drew, they should have been offering more money for that position and they could have avoided that loss. If your only offering 14 million a year for that position, that is the type of results you get. Remember these often recycled executives are the most important people in the world of business. If we don't offer the executives these large pay packages then they won't have any incentive to work. The companies would fail and soon everyone will be out of work. These are the only people in the world that can run these companies. If we risk negotiating their salaries down they might decide to not work companies will fail thus throwing the world into chaos.
Talent, you're kidding. I suggest you read Retirement Heist by Ellen Schultz and Who Stole The American Dream? by Hedrick Smith. Both books provide an excellent history of the last 30+ years. This month the Swiss passed a law that requires shareholder approval of executive compensation of any publicly traded company. Sounds like the USA needs the same law. Doubtful because we have the best Congress money could buy. Your talented executive have destroyed manufacturing in this country, shipped those jobs to China and other places. I wonder how World War II would have worked out if in the 20s and 30s American executives had sent manufacturing to low cost countries like Japan, Germany, and Italy. I've lived and worked in Third World countries in Asia and Africa. Guess what? The USA is headed to join the due to these "Talented Executives". They all have a very small group of very, very, wealthy that control money and political power, then they have a small middle class, and then the 47%.
American industries are filled with zero in the way of ethics, short term employees interested in short term results. Why do you think almost every US Airline has been in Chapter 11.