Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Alaska TA passes

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Once again, just like the Age 65 "debate", the issue is dead. 85% of our pilots voted FOR the contract. It was an overwhelming landslide.

Funny that the 15% number of NO votes pretty much coincides with the number of Reserves/Junior Captains who have fallen for the fearmongering posted here and on the Alaska ALPA board.

FURLOUGHS!
DOWNGRADES!
90 HOUR LINES!
EASY VSA!
LIONS AND TIGERS AND BEARS!

Oh my.

The 85% number represents lineholding Captains and F/Os who evaluated the TA and understood how the new framework would benefit their status and quality of life.

Democracy in action! You gotta love that. Of course, like Republicans, we'll be treated with a lot of whining and gnashing of teeth written in the largest darkest font available from the 15%. And like the anti-Age 65 crowd, it won't change a thing.

Let the finger pointing and name calling begin. That won't change anything either. But, if it makes YOU feel better, go for it. Just understand, 85% of us don't care. I suggest if you don't like the result, run for LEC/MEC Officer or volunteer for the Negotiating Committee.
 
I was warned not to come here by and old United pilot and now I finally get it....A raise will only happen if no one wants to work here because the pay is so lousy.

That's called supply and demand. Alaska seems to have no problem attracting qualified pilot recruits.

By accepting this TA by 85% we have just told the company that they gave too much. They could have said new hires would get no pension and only 3% in their 401K's and it would have easily passed.

That would qualify as a "condition of employment" just like the B-scale did when I got hired. I knew what the pay was when I signed on. New hires will know that their retirement is a Defined Contribution plan as opposed to a Defined Benefit plan. If that's a deal breaker, they will go somewhere else. Guess what? We will STILL have plenty of candidates.

If I was them I would come out with a wage freeze next time and stall until the mediator threatened to release the union. That will waste about 2 years, then you throw a 5-4-3-2-1 % raise over five years at them and dare them to turn it down. By now the reps phones will be ringing off the hook with guys screaming at them to take it because the economy somewhere in the country is bad. Maybe then they can get 50% + 1, which is their goal.

If "ifs and buts" were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas. Can I use your crystal ball when you're finished?

Hey, maybe Alaska will buy Air Tran, we'll staple all those rubes to the bottom of our list and YOU can be the #1 Captain in Orlando overnight. That's just as possible as YOUR doomsday scenario.

The bottom line is if this contract is SO intolerable you can always resign and one of our furloughed guys will GLADLY take your place. Good luck in your job search. I won't hold my breath waiting for that resignation letter though.
 
Fubi, do you need any extra salt or maybe some help twisting the knife?
 
"Never take counsel of your fears." - Andrew Jackson
 
"Never take counsel of your fears." - Andrew Jackson

Listen. Pandoras box isn't even open yet. Frankly, you don't know what you have agreed to because this company has a long history of forgetting agreements.

Six years from NOW, we will be earning LESS money, (not even accounting for inflation, but a simple lower number of dollars) than we earned 5 years AGO. For this reason alone, I voted No.

We just voted, by a landslide, to take another huge paycut. I'm not saying there weren't some good things to be had, but I think you need to check your attitude a bit...SWA still makes $30k more a year than you do and they're losing more money.

Personally, I'm happy to move on from the Kasher years. However, I think we could have done better.
 
Last edited:
What do you use to polish that crystal ball? Minwax? Pledge?
 
I'm a 15%er

I am one of the few who was willing to take a stand against a mediocre contract after taking it in the shorts by a company making millions. I, like many others, will pay a dear price for this contract, not this year, but over the next couple. And four years from now I hope you can say you were right and I was an idiot, I truly truly hope so, but I am afraid that's not the way it will play out.
We did not get a contract that was fair and equitable to all. We got one that benefited the 55+ ers.
How's Vision 2010 treating you so far? There are even less pilots on the property now than when Bill Ayers first brought his "vision" to us. I am counting the months. 7 more and I will be a CAPTAIN just like Bill said!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top