Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Alaska Suckers

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You're probably on to something there. From what I might of heard is that AS is probably paying good $$$ for a quality product and don't mind it a bit. Good things to come from that contract and possibly additional flying in future.


Good product likely. Better than QX, NO. From Managements view probably, SkyWest has a lower hourly rate and costs. QX has CAT3, RNP, LPV GPS app and industry leading rates before arbitration kicks in.
 
Mesa, being in bankruptcy, was most likely unable to bid on this business...It was outsourced from an expensive operator (Horizon) to a cheaper operator (SkyWest).
 
Mesa, being in bankruptcy, was most likely unable to bid on this business...It was outsourced from an expensive operator (Horizon) to a cheaper operator (SkyWest).

Great Lakes is in bankruptcy, bid on and WON EAS bids. I don't see much difference here.
 
Knock off the name calling.. and stop reporting BS posts.. get some thicker skin.. warning are out.. suspensions coming..

end of story.. MOd cl4
 
Ironic that Alaska is actually much better positioned financially than SWA in anyway you can rate them. Stock price, profits, balance sheet etc. They established themselves by offering a better product than most and they actually fly to Mexico themselves rather than get someone else to do it for them like SWAPA allows. Simple fact is SWA has been lucky to have employee friendly management for now. ALPA may not be perfect, but if it wasn't for ALPA the AK pilots would be a lot worse off.
I'm guessing SWA was your first airline and perhaps you went with them after all the ALPA carriers turned you down. I don't know, but it wasn't long ago that people bought 737 types to get on with SWA if they couldn't get on with an ALPA carrier, is that you?
BTW, what's wrong with owning a yogurt shop? Being a successful small business owner is just as good as someone who flies airliners around.

Haha. I think the Section 1 at SW and Alaska are slightly different.

I hope the Alaska guys can get the holding company under Section 1, if not I fear it will eventually be off to the races for 'larger feed'. Good luck guys.
 
It doesn't matter because Alaska never put a RFP. They were just selling RJ's and I assume whoever was buying them got negotiate a CPA deal with Alaska.

Mesa, being in bankruptcy, was most likely unable to bid on this business...It was outsourced from an expensive operator (Horizon) to a cheaper operator (SkyWest).
 
It doesn't matter because Alaska never put a RFP. They were just selling RJ's and I assume whoever was buying them got negotiate a CPA deal with Alaska.

One other problem is we did not sell them!!! We are leasing them!!!!!!
Does this open another can of worms???
 

Latest resources

Back
Top