Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Alaska Airlines Raises Fares

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Old School 737

NG's now and it is A OK!!
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Posts
986
ALASKA AIRLINES RAISES FARES
TO HELP OFFSET RISING FUEL COSTS

SEATTLE — In response to the skyrocketing price of jet fuel, Alaska Airlines has raised one-way fares $5 to $10.
“With the price of a barrel of crude oil spiking more than 50 percent since this time last year, jet fuel is now our largest single expense, accounting for more than 30 percent of our overall operating costs,” said Bill Ayer, chairman and chief executive officer of Alaska Air Group, the parent company of Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air. “Like other businesses, we need to offset at least some of our increased costs.”
Every $1 increase in the price of a barrel of oil adds $10 million in annual fuel costs for Alaska Air Group before the benefit of fuel hedges. Oil prices have jumped $10 a barrel during the past two weeks alone, which would add $100 million to the company’s annual fuel bill if prices remain at current levels.
Fares for longer flights in the United States and to Canada and Mexico rose $10 each way. Shorter flights along the West Coast, within most of the state of Alaska, and between Southeast Alaska and the Lower 48 went up $5 each way.
Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air continually work to mitigate fare increases resulting from the cost of jet fuel through hedging. Currently, 50 percent of the two airlines’ fourth quarter fuel consumption is hedged at $62 per barrel.
Alaska Airlines and Horizon Air serve 92 cities through an expansive network throughout Alaska, the Lower 48, Hawaii, Canada and Mexico. For reservations, visit alaskaair.com. For more news and information, visit the Alaska Airlines/Horizon Air Newsroom at alaskaair.com/newsroom.
 
Bout time!! I don't this was enough of a hike.
 
If gasoline prices go up, who pays for it? The customer of course. I don't know why we can't do this as easily with airline ticket prices. Bring on the fuel surcharges!!
 
If they can raise ticket prices to keep up with the fuel costs....how about raising them to give the pilots back some of what they forced on them in concessions? Why fly around with load factors approaching 90% with cut rate fares? I say raise all the fares 25% across board, sure the load factors will drop 20% or so....but the profit would increase exponentially. Decreased fuel cost, ground handling, rip a few rows of seats out and have fewer flight attendants, carry more cargo, ect. I'd rather seen 1/2 the seats open and turn a profit on the flight, maybe our useless non-rev benifits would be worth something again?
 
“Like other businesses, we need to offset at least some of our increased costs.”


What a concept!

Why did they slash our wages across the industry again?

Oh yeah... forgot. We were too chicken sh*t to call their bluff on "closing the doors if we don't get these concessions from you."

Think there was no other alternative?

Look at how they're all raising fares now. Better yet, look at the executive compensation all across the industry. Better yet, look at the price of oil AND the current industry profits.

I hope you "yes"-voting fools remember this when managements come knocking for concessions again.
 
What a concept!

Why did they slash our wages across the industry again?

Oh yeah... forgot. We were too chicken sh*t to call their bluff on "closing the doors if we don't get these concessions from you."

Think there was no other alternative?

Look at how they're all raising fares now. Better yet, look at the executive compensation all across the industry. Better yet, look at the price of oil AND the current industry profits.

I hope you "yes"-voting fools remember this when managements come knocking for concessions again.


WOW! Someone else like minded! We could all take a clue from the French Farmers and Truckdrivers. Every 4 or 5 years you'll notice on the news that they go on strike. And I mean ON STRIKE, take the tractors and block ports, roads, parliment,ect. Shut the entire country down for 2-3 days...amazingly enough they GET thier fair share! Even though it's an "Illegal" work action, what's France going to do...lock them ALL up? Who would bring in the crops then?

Even though it wouldn't be "legal" under the current TOTAL BS Railway Labor act (by the way, how'd we get hoodwinked into being regulated by a railway act that is antiquated labor laws at the very best?)....I say they next and I mean VERY NEXT Airline Group that takes a walk (even if it's for ONE day)...I say we ALL walk!!! Shut the country DOWN and then see how valuable WE are!

Prater ran on taking it back...well, friends, the time is comming and SOON! If the AA boys walk this summer...well they should have some company. And I don't care if you are Teamsters, Alpa, Swapa or whatever other variation. BE1900 FO to 747-400 Captain....we are ALL in this together and we need to start acting like it instead of berating each other on here over who got screwed the most and who's currently making the most flying the smallest equipment. That equation could flipflop faster than a CEO stocks being sold!
 
I hope you "yes"-voting fools remember this when managements come knocking for concessions again.

Just to be clear, there was no "yes" vote at AS. The AS pilots had concessions imposed on them by an arbitrator due to a binding arbitration clause that was in the previous contract, signed in better times.
 
Just to be clear, there was no "yes" vote at AS. The AS pilots had concessions imposed on them by an arbitrator due to a binding arbitration clause that was in the previous contract, signed in better times.

I took that "yes voter" comment to mean the hoodwinked masses industry-wide. Your airline is proof positive that draconian pay cuts weren't necessary to "weather the storm."
 
I took that "yes voter" comment to mean the hoodwinked masses industry-wide. Your airline is proof positive that draconian pay cuts weren't necessary to "weather the storm."

OK, fair 'nuff. In many cases, however (UAL, NWA, US, DL) the issue was not whether concessions were neccessary to weather the storm, but whether voting yes would prevent pro-management bankruptcy judges from imposing worse. In hindsight perhaps they should've rolled the dice with the judges and hoped for the best; I really can't fault them much for making the decisions they made at the time.

The important thing is that everybody is on the same page about getting back what we lost.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom