Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Regarding what, exactly?My sources say other wise......
Agree on all counts. Unfortunately, Joe was apparently talking to a newhire class right before he resigned and stated that Alaska had absolutely zero interest in a merger. I'd love to see a merger with Alaska, but I dread the thought of an SWA merger.Im sure SWA wants all those gates in ATL that cant handle a 737... How many gates does AAI have in ATL that can actually take a 737... Maybe 10?? Besides.. The big news that never happend was that SWA was going to buy Alaska.. Now, AAI and Alasaka would be an awesome company..
Im sure SWA wants all those gates in ATL that cant handle a 737... How many gates does AAI have in ATL that can actually take a 737... Maybe 10?? Besides.. The big news that never happend was that SWA was going to buy Alaska.. Now, AAI and Alasaka would be an awesome company..
From what I've heard, we'd lose a lot more than 2 gates by converting everything to 737 gates. Last I heard, there was no chance of it happening. Gate space in ATL is simply too valuable.I have been told that airtran will turn all the gates on C + D into 737 gates. This will cause a net lose of about 2 gates on C.
The company that owens the gate rights on D is now charging based on number of sests. The latest is only 717s are going to park on D. Converting more C gates to fit the 73, but not all the C gates. Thus, only a loss of 2 C gates.
There are now two or three jet ways on the ASA side of C near ABC, anyone know what thoes sre for?
I know this is off-topic, but why the defeatism in your quote above?
If we merge with SWA, or even if SWA buys AirTran outright, do you actually think they are going to park (87) B-717's? If they were to merge/buy AirTran, they inherit the entire route system. By removing 87 aircraft overnight, that route system will collapse and they'll be in bankruptcy by the end of the week. This is not an ATA deal, nor is it a TWA type deal where both of those carriers were on Liquidation's doorstep. AirTran is a profitable company with new aircraft. That puts them in a totally different league from ATA and TWA.
There is no reason why SWA would not welcome a fuel efficient, state of the art airplane like the B-717 into its fleet. If anything, the B-717 pilots would be a protected group. Do you think SWA is going to allow their own B-737 pilots to bid over to the B-717 and incur all those training costs...at least during the first two years?