Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airtran takes top AQR spot

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Andy

12/13/2012
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Posts
3,101
Sorry, don't have a link. Copied and pasted from APC.

AIR TRAN TAKES TOP AQR SPOT, INDUSTRY SCORE FALLS TO NEW LOW

Washington D.C. – Air Tran has taken the top spot in the 18th annual national Airline Quality Ratings (AQR) study. Last year, Air Tran ranked third in the AQR.

Following Air Tran in the top five of the AQR were Jet Blue, Southwest, Northwest and Frontier.
As far as an overall rating for the industry, this is the worst AQR score ever, according to the AQR researchers. The second worst was for calendar year 2000. There are similarities between 2000 and 2007, specifically:


-During both 2000 and 2007 there was talk of the United States heading into a recession;
-The airlines were making money after a nonprofitable period; and
-Demand for air travel was strong.

The AQR is a summary of month-by-month quality ratings for the largest domestic U.S. airlines operating during 2007. Co-researchers Brent Bowen, professor at the University of Nebraska at Omaha (UNO) Aviation Institute/School of Public Administration, and Dean Headley, associate professor and chair of marketing at Wichita State University (WSU), used 15 elements important to consumers when judging the quality of airline service.

Air Tran gained ground in the industry and in the ratings because of superior baggage handling. Taken as an entire industry, the airlines declined in all areas of performance, Bowen said. “I don’t expect to see better airline performance in the near future. There’s no incentive,” Headley said. “The airlines are losing money. Fuel prices are high. They’re cutting back on services. They’re cutting back on people. Everything it takes to run an airline is more expensive, and the airlines want less of that expense.”

Sixteen airlines were studied for the 2008 ratings report. The Airline Report Card is a unique figure that shows each airlines' individual rating since the AQR began 18 years ago. This visual aid offers invaluable historical reporting opportunities, Bowen said. It is available on-line at
aqr.aero
Researchers at the UNO Aviation Institute and the W. Frank Barton School of Business at WSU conduct the ratings annually. The AQR, as an industry standard, provides consumers and industry watchers a means to compare quality among airlines using objective performance-based data. It is a joint research project funded as part of faculty research activities at UNO and WSU.

"With the U.S. airline industry at rock-bottom in terms of overall performance, greater accountability is necessary. It is very difficult for air travel consumers to have a collective voice,” Bowen said. “The AQR.aero research team is providing new mechanisms for the everyday passenger to be heard.”

The air traveler can make a difference through participating in the aqr.aero research survey, the first of several new tools to aid the traveling public. Just go to aqr.aero and click on the ‘survey’ link. By participating, travelers will have access to the Web site’s future airline service problem reporting feature. This will also help researchers gather valuable data that may help slow the substantial decline in airline service performance that they reported this year.

The AQR scores for the largest airlines for 2007 resulted in the following ranking:
1. Air Tran
2. Jet Blue
3. Southwest
4. Northwest
5. Frontier
6. Continental
7. Alaska
8. United
9. American
10. Delta
11. US Airways
12. Mesa
13. SkyWest
14. Comair
15. American Eagle
16. Atlantic Southeast

Criteria included in the AQR are screened to meet two basic elements: They must be readily obtainable from published data sources for each airline, and they must be important to consumers regarding airline quality. The resulting criteria include areas such as baggage handling, customer complaints, denied boardings and on-time arrivals.

Other major industry findings in this year’s research study include:

Only four of the 16 airlines improved their AQR score. They were Air Tran, American Eagle, Atlantic Southeast and Mesa. The most improved airline was Mesa; it improved in three of the four categories – denied boardings, mishandled bags and customer complaints. Its on-time performance was similar to last year.

The airline that declined the most in performance was US Airways.



I'm glad to see that United didn't take the #16 spot. And no, I didn't change anyone's ranking. :)
 
Sorry, don't have a link. Copied and pasted from APC.

AIR TRAN TAKES TOP AQR SPOT, INDUSTRY SCORE FALLS TO NEW LOW

Washington D.C. – Air Tran has taken the top spot in the 18th annual national Airline Quality Ratings (AQR) study. Last year, Air Tran ranked third in the AQR.
Following Air Tran in the top five of the AQR were Jet Blue, Southwest, Northwest and Frontier.
As far as an overall rating for the industry, this is the worst AQR score ever, according to the AQR researchers. The second worst was for calendar year 2000. There are similarities between 2000 and 2007, specifically:

-During both 2000 and 2007 there was talk of the United States heading into a recession;
-The airlines were making money after a nonprofitable period; and
-Demand for air travel was strong.

The AQR is a summary of month-by-month quality ratings for the largest domestic U.S. airlines operating during 2007. Co-researchers Brent Bowen, professor at the University of Nebraska at Omaha (UNO) Aviation Institute/School of Public Administration, and Dean Headley, associate professor and chair of marketing at Wichita State University (WSU), used 15 elements important to consumers when judging the quality of airline service.

Air Tran gained ground in the industry and in the ratings because of superior baggage handling. Taken as an entire industry, the airlines declined in all areas of performance, Bowen said. “I don’t expect to see better airline performance in the near future. There’s no incentive,” Headley said. “The airlines are losing money. Fuel prices are high. They’re cutting back on services. They’re cutting back on people. Everything it takes to run an airline is more expensive, and the airlines want less of that expense.”

Sixteen airlines were studied for the 2008 ratings report. The Airline Report Card is a unique figure that shows each airlines' individual rating since the AQR began 18 years ago. This visual aid offers invaluable historical reporting opportunities, Bowen said. It is available on-line at aqr.aero
Researchers at the UNO Aviation Institute and the W. Frank Barton School of Business at WSU conduct the ratings annually. The AQR, as an industry standard, provides consumers and industry watchers a means to compare quality among airlines using objective performance-based data. It is a joint research project funded as part of faculty research activities at UNO and WSU.

"With the U.S. airline industry at rock-bottom in terms of overall performance, greater accountability is necessary. It is very difficult for air travel consumers to have a collective voice,” Bowen said. “The AQR.aero research team is providing new mechanisms for the everyday passenger to be heard.”

The air traveler can make a difference through participating in the aqr.aero research survey, the first of several new tools to aid the traveling public. Just go to aqr.aero and click on the ‘survey’ link. By participating, travelers will have access to the Web site’s future airline service problem reporting feature. This will also help researchers gather valuable data that may help slow the substantial decline in airline service performance that they reported this year.

The AQR scores for the largest airlines for 2007 resulted in the following ranking:
1. Air Tran
2. Jet Blue
3. Southwest
4. Northwest
5. Frontier
6. Continental
7. Alaska
8. United
9. American
10. Delta
11. US Airways
12. Mesa
13. SkyWest
14. Comair
15. American Eagle
16. Atlantic Southeast

Criteria included in the AQR are screened to meet two basic elements: They must be readily obtainable from published data sources for each airline, and they must be important to consumers regarding airline quality. The resulting criteria include areas such as baggage handling, customer complaints, denied boardings and on-time arrivals.

Other major industry findings in this year’s research study include:

Only four of the 16 airlines improved their AQR score. They were Air Tran, American Eagle, Atlantic Southeast and Mesa. The most improved airline was Mesa; it improved in three of the four categories – denied boardings, mishandled bags and customer complaints. Its on-time performance was similar to last year.

The airline that declined the most in performance was US Airways.



I'm glad to see that United didn't take the #16 spot. And no, I didn't change anyone's ranking. :)

Congradulations to the folks at Airtran!

Unfortunately, in the days of 'cheapest fare at any cost and $105-110/bbl. oil' these 'rankings' don't seem to mean that much anymore.

Example; Anyone know who was #1 in 'ontime performance' for the month of Feb?? Answer: Aloha.

(There's got to be some irony in there somewhere)

For what its worth.

DA
 
Hmmmm . . . . not sure what this says about the industry :rolleyes: . . . . .

I do have to say, though, that there has been a lot of improvement in the ATL Ramp operation over the past year or so, and they have hired some Agents that have more people skills than in previous years.

The glue that holds it all together, as we all know, is the Pilot group, but after three years of "old school contract negotiating tactics", management has destroyed much of the goodwill that used to exist.

The previous Cantract Offer from management showed their desire to operate AirTran like a Regional Airline . . . . one only has to look at the bottom of that AQR report to see where the regionals ranked.

TW
 
Last edited:
I kind of chuckled when I read this today but then had to wonder just how bad things have become in this industry. My beloved Continental is lower than it has been in years. Why I must ask? Our planes are clean, we run ontime more than most, we serve real hot food in both cabins, etc. etc., and we still get beat by 6 airlines? I really am confused. I'm sure there are things I don't know.
 
I kind of chuckled when I read this today but then had to wonder just how bad things have become in this industry. My beloved Continental is lower than it has been in years. Why I must ask? Our planes are clean, we run ontime more than most, we serve real hot food in both cabins, etc. etc., and we still get beat by 6 airlines? I really am confused. I'm sure there are things I don't know.

My guess is the delays and problems caused by your Newark hub would be my guess. Need to keep pushing Coex's 50 seaters over to CLE to unload the hub congestion. Airtran's overall performance has been greatly enhanced over the last few years as ATL has learned how to use the 5 runways pretty efficiently. I would bet Jetblue product is better than our except for the fact that JFK has alot more delays than ATL.

People really only want 2 things with their cheap ticket, to arrive ontime with their bags. In that respect, Airtran does a pretty good job.
 
Hey congrats to Air Tran guys. I made a little joke on the NWA site and I think they took it personally.

Not to dismiss or deminish the ratings, but does this really change the bottom line. I mean does the industry track how this changes ticket sales or if it has any effect on swaying public opinion?

I mean, why does the industry keep track in the first place? Is it law? Just curious.

Hopefully, it will give you one more shell in your contract negotiation arsenal.
 
Last edited:
and we still get beat by 6 airlines? I really am confused. I'm sure there are things I don't know.
Two reasons:

1. Our stews weren't alive to see the dawn of the 20th century, and

2. Our passengers aren't subjected to four-hour flights on replacement jets

Hopefully we keep it that way.
 
Pax do not care if they get a hamburger and chips on a flight if when they get there they are LATE, and they do not get their bags for a few days!

If you have ever lost your bag or someone you know=It is the biggest pain in the a%%!!!

A friend (paying pax) flew on Delta, they lost her bag, 6 days later they found it. I was at the airport in uniform, and I had the bag tag number and they had no clue how to track it !! SAD !!!
 
I kind of chuckled when I read this today but then had to wonder just how bad things have become in this industry. My beloved Continental is lower than it has been in years. Why I must ask? Our planes are clean, we run ontime more than most, we serve real hot food in both cabins, etc. etc., and we still get beat by 6 airlines? I really am confused. I'm sure there are things I don't know.

Let me enlighten you. The food may be real hot, but not real good. A tasteless chork casserole is not my idea of real food. You operate out of EWR and say you run ontime? Hmmm.
 
Two reasons:

1. Our stews weren't alive to see the dawn of the 20th century, and

2. Our passengers aren't subjected to four-hour flights on replacement jets

Hopefully we keep it that way.

Ummm, I worked at Airtran for almost 3 years. I'd put our stews up against yours anyday. The other point is well taken!!
 
Yep.... CaL's stews are much better than AAI's.... unless you like.................. well. nevermind...
 
Yep.... CaL's stews are much better than AAI's.... unless you like.................. well. nevermind...

I spoke with an inflight supervisor (she also does interviews) and they have begun hiring exclusively from the college.
 
Don't get me wrong, AirTran has some great FA's. A few I still keep up with however more often than not(and maybe it was my bad luck) I had to walk on eggshells as to not offend anybody. I'm talking about the 0500 van rides where they are on their 500.00 cell phones talking to God knows who on the other end at that time of day etc. etc. Not that we don't have that at CAL(especially new ones in the EWR). Anyway, this was not to start a my airline is better than your airline thread. I was actually kind of joking with my initial post. Congrats AirTran.
 
Don't get me wrong, AirTran has some great FA's. A few I still keep up with however more often than not(and maybe it was my bad luck) I had to walk on eggshells as to not offend anybody. I'm talking about the 0500 van rides where they are on their 500.00 cell phones talking to God knows who on the other end at that time of day etc. etc. Not that we don't have that at CAL(especially new ones in the EWR). Anyway, this was not to start a my airline is better than your airline thread. I was actually kind of joking with my initial post. Congrats AirTran.

Totally agree with you here man. Fuking $500 cellphones and can't tip the van drivers. Always amazed me.
 
Hmmmm . . . . not sure what this says about the industry :rolleyes: . . . . .

I do have to say, though, that there has been a lot of improvement in the ATL Ramp operation over the past year or so, and they have hired some Agents that have more people skills than in previous years.

The glue that holds it all together, as we all know, is the Pilot group, but after three years of "old school contract negotiating tactics", management has destroyed much of the goodwill that used to exist.

The previous Cantract Offer from management showed their desire to operate AirTran like a Regional Airline . . . . one only has to look at the bottom of that AQR report to see where the regionals ranked.

TW


Good point on the agents. Better management has been hired on the Cust Serv front in the last year to take care of the problems. Being in the top 3 each year in least amount of lost bags is great too...

I'd like to think my 4+ years at the Citrus has helped with the continued transformation of this airline. I know a bunch of hard working non-pilot "crew members" though who'd like to think they're part of the "glue" too...a lot of people working overnights in the tower making sure things are place for the next day, agents pulling doubles, IROP people checking all the close connections, etc...
 
Don't get me wrong, AirTran has some great FA's. A few I still keep up with however more often than not(and maybe it was my bad luck) I had to walk on eggshells as to not offend anybody. I'm talking about the 0500 van rides where they are on their 500.00 cell phones talking to God knows who on the other end at that time of day etc. etc. Not that we don't have that at CAL(especially new ones in the EWR). Anyway, this was not to start a my airline is better than your airline thread. I was actually kind of joking with my initial post. Congrats AirTran.

I'm always thinking the same thing. Who the hell are they talking to that early? You know you miss flying with "The Supremes" every day. ;)
 
I'd like to think my 4+ years at the Citrus has helped with the continued transformation of this airline. I know a bunch of hard working non-pilot "crew members" though who'd like to think they're part of the "glue" too...a lot of people working overnights in the tower making sure things are place for the next day, agents pulling doubles, IROP people checking all the close connections, etc...

I don't mean to "take away" anything from the deeply committed people in a variety of departments who make this a much better operation year-over-year in ways that are obvious to myself and others . . . .

What I am getting at, though, are things that you would have to be at an outstation at 0440 local to see, or at 0200 local when ATL is turning into "the fall of Saigon in slow motion" after a squall line has passed, or even just getting a 5 hour-long flight into ATL, followed by a C1 to D1 "Trail of Tears" trek that is supposed to result in a 35 minute turn (or less) . . . . most of us are committed, problem-solving types who want to make this operation happen smoothly, and have to take the initiative on a daily basis to make things happen on-time, and the results are apparent (for those who want to see it).

If the pilots finally get frustrated enough to stop doing all those extra things that they historically have done, even when they are "off the clock", you may be surprised to see the difference . . . . and for the particularly-dense types out there- no, I am not talking about a "job action", I am just stating the obvious- if you keep kicking the pilots in the nuts, eventually, even the most dedicated types give up. You don't even have to be Madam Cleo to see the future- just look over on the north side of Concourse C to see what happens when you treat your pilots like crap (no offense to the hard-working ASA pilots- you guys deserve much better, and I understand your frustration).

TW
 
Last edited:
I don't mean to "take away" anything from the deeply committed people in a variety of departments who make this a much better operation year-over-year in ways that are obvious to myself and others . . . .

What I am getting at, though, are things that you would have to be at an outstation at 0440 local to see, or at 0200 local when ATL is turning into "the fall of Saigon in slow motion" after a squall line has passed, or even just getting a 5 hour-long flight into ATL, followed by a C1 to D1 "Trail of Tears" trek that is supposed to result in a 35 minute turn (or less) . . . . most of us are committed, problem-solving types who want to make this operation happen smoothly, and have to take the initiative on a daily basis to make things happen on-time, and the results are apparent (for those who want to see it).

If the pilots finally get frustrated enough to stop doing all those extra things that they historically have done, even when they are "off the clock", you may be surprised to see the difference . . . . and for the particularly-dense types out there- no, I am not talking about a "job action", I am just stating the obvious- if you keep kicking the pilots in the nuts, eventually, even the most dedicated types give up. You don't even have to be Madam Cleo to see the future- just look over on the north side of Concourse C to see what happens when you treat your pilots like crap (no offense to the hard-working ASA pilots- you guys deserve much better, and I understand your frustration).

TW

Wow. The same can be said of jb.
 
We were talking about this list in the Tower (ATL) last night. Very interesting since essentailly TRS and ASA get the same qulaity ATC service from us out of ATL, which is both airlines principle and only hub. And since both primarily park on ramp 3 & 4 (so we assume they get fairly standardized service from that notorius ramp tower). So, what's the difference? Why did TRS score so well in terms of on-time performance and baggage, and ASA do so poorly?
People in high places at ATL want to know!
 
We were talking about this list in the Tower (ATL) last night. Very interesting since essentailly TRS and ASA get the same qulaity ATC service from us out of ATL, which is both airlines principle and only hub. And since both primarily park on ramp 3 & 4 (so we assume they get fairly standardized service from that notorius ramp tower). So, what's the difference? Why did TRS score so well in terms of on-time performance and baggage, and ASA do so poorly?
People in high places at ATL want to know!

Cause we rule dawg!!!
 
I'd put our stews up against yours anyday.

You got that right, although our stews have been improving in the two years I've been here.
Had one playing videos on his phone with the volume on high in the early am van ride yesterday, almost grabbed the phone and threw out of the window, one day I will.:uzi:
 
So, what's the difference? Why did TRS score so well in terms of on-time performance and baggage, and ASA do so poorly?
People in high places at ATL want to know!

Have you ever been to the north side of D-con. D-con?...Isn't that a mouse/rat poison? That's kind of funny... anyway, its not saying much that you're the best because everyone else sucks. Although I'm sure MCO will use this to justify bigger bonuses while TRYING to gain concessions from the Pilots.
 
We were talking about this list in the Tower (ATL) last night. Very interesting since essentailly TRS and ASA get the same qulaity ATC service from us out of ATL, which is both airlines principle and only hub. And since both primarily park on ramp 3 & 4 (so we assume they get fairly standardized service from that notorius ramp tower). So, what's the difference? Why did TRS score so well in terms of on-time performance and baggage, and ASA do so poorly?
People in high places at ATL want to know!

That is a good question, but I if I had to guess it probably comes down to the way the airlines are managed. I know from my previous regional airline experience that regional airlines aren't responsible for attracting and keeping customers. That is the mainline's job (to a point). Since regional airlines usually operate under long-term service contracts with their mainline partner that guarantee a set price for their service, the urgency to attract and keep customers isn't as prevelant as it is at AirTran. At AirTran the ability to attract and keep customers is the lifeblood of our operations, because without that ability we won't stay in business too long. Now sure the mainline partner can cancel a service agreemnet for failure to perform (as we have seen with mesa and Delta), but that usually gets the regional partner to do just enough not to be terminated which isn't enough in the customers eyes.
 
Let me ask some more stupid questions....but doesn't DAL handle the all baggage and customer service stuff for ASA at ATL? Also doesn't DAL set the schedules via their marketing department for ASA (you know those riduculous 30 minute turns on ramp 4 - shoot that ramp tower can't even find the RJs a place to park inbound that fast)? And if what we here is true, then why doesn't DAL get some of the negative credit for ASA's ineptitude?
Just curious.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom