Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airtran takes top AQR spot

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Andy

12/13/2012
Joined
Nov 28, 2001
Posts
3,101
Sorry, don't have a link. Copied and pasted from APC.

AIR TRAN TAKES TOP AQR SPOT, INDUSTRY SCORE FALLS TO NEW LOW

Washington D.C. – Air Tran has taken the top spot in the 18th annual national Airline Quality Ratings (AQR) study. Last year, Air Tran ranked third in the AQR.

Following Air Tran in the top five of the AQR were Jet Blue, Southwest, Northwest and Frontier.
As far as an overall rating for the industry, this is the worst AQR score ever, according to the AQR researchers. The second worst was for calendar year 2000. There are similarities between 2000 and 2007, specifically:


-During both 2000 and 2007 there was talk of the United States heading into a recession;
-The airlines were making money after a nonprofitable period; and
-Demand for air travel was strong.

The AQR is a summary of month-by-month quality ratings for the largest domestic U.S. airlines operating during 2007. Co-researchers Brent Bowen, professor at the University of Nebraska at Omaha (UNO) Aviation Institute/School of Public Administration, and Dean Headley, associate professor and chair of marketing at Wichita State University (WSU), used 15 elements important to consumers when judging the quality of airline service.

Air Tran gained ground in the industry and in the ratings because of superior baggage handling. Taken as an entire industry, the airlines declined in all areas of performance, Bowen said. “I don’t expect to see better airline performance in the near future. There’s no incentive,” Headley said. “The airlines are losing money. Fuel prices are high. They’re cutting back on services. They’re cutting back on people. Everything it takes to run an airline is more expensive, and the airlines want less of that expense.”

Sixteen airlines were studied for the 2008 ratings report. The Airline Report Card is a unique figure that shows each airlines' individual rating since the AQR began 18 years ago. This visual aid offers invaluable historical reporting opportunities, Bowen said. It is available on-line at
aqr.aero
Researchers at the UNO Aviation Institute and the W. Frank Barton School of Business at WSU conduct the ratings annually. The AQR, as an industry standard, provides consumers and industry watchers a means to compare quality among airlines using objective performance-based data. It is a joint research project funded as part of faculty research activities at UNO and WSU.

"With the U.S. airline industry at rock-bottom in terms of overall performance, greater accountability is necessary. It is very difficult for air travel consumers to have a collective voice,” Bowen said. “The AQR.aero research team is providing new mechanisms for the everyday passenger to be heard.”

The air traveler can make a difference through participating in the aqr.aero research survey, the first of several new tools to aid the traveling public. Just go to aqr.aero and click on the ‘survey’ link. By participating, travelers will have access to the Web site’s future airline service problem reporting feature. This will also help researchers gather valuable data that may help slow the substantial decline in airline service performance that they reported this year.

The AQR scores for the largest airlines for 2007 resulted in the following ranking:
1. Air Tran
2. Jet Blue
3. Southwest
4. Northwest
5. Frontier
6. Continental
7. Alaska
8. United
9. American
10. Delta
11. US Airways
12. Mesa
13. SkyWest
14. Comair
15. American Eagle
16. Atlantic Southeast

Criteria included in the AQR are screened to meet two basic elements: They must be readily obtainable from published data sources for each airline, and they must be important to consumers regarding airline quality. The resulting criteria include areas such as baggage handling, customer complaints, denied boardings and on-time arrivals.

Other major industry findings in this year’s research study include:

Only four of the 16 airlines improved their AQR score. They were Air Tran, American Eagle, Atlantic Southeast and Mesa. The most improved airline was Mesa; it improved in three of the four categories – denied boardings, mishandled bags and customer complaints. Its on-time performance was similar to last year.

The airline that declined the most in performance was US Airways.



I'm glad to see that United didn't take the #16 spot. And no, I didn't change anyone's ranking. :)
 
Sorry, don't have a link. Copied and pasted from APC.

AIR TRAN TAKES TOP AQR SPOT, INDUSTRY SCORE FALLS TO NEW LOW

Washington D.C. – Air Tran has taken the top spot in the 18th annual national Airline Quality Ratings (AQR) study. Last year, Air Tran ranked third in the AQR.
Following Air Tran in the top five of the AQR were Jet Blue, Southwest, Northwest and Frontier.
As far as an overall rating for the industry, this is the worst AQR score ever, according to the AQR researchers. The second worst was for calendar year 2000. There are similarities between 2000 and 2007, specifically:

-During both 2000 and 2007 there was talk of the United States heading into a recession;
-The airlines were making money after a nonprofitable period; and
-Demand for air travel was strong.

The AQR is a summary of month-by-month quality ratings for the largest domestic U.S. airlines operating during 2007. Co-researchers Brent Bowen, professor at the University of Nebraska at Omaha (UNO) Aviation Institute/School of Public Administration, and Dean Headley, associate professor and chair of marketing at Wichita State University (WSU), used 15 elements important to consumers when judging the quality of airline service.

Air Tran gained ground in the industry and in the ratings because of superior baggage handling. Taken as an entire industry, the airlines declined in all areas of performance, Bowen said. “I don’t expect to see better airline performance in the near future. There’s no incentive,” Headley said. “The airlines are losing money. Fuel prices are high. They’re cutting back on services. They’re cutting back on people. Everything it takes to run an airline is more expensive, and the airlines want less of that expense.”

Sixteen airlines were studied for the 2008 ratings report. The Airline Report Card is a unique figure that shows each airlines' individual rating since the AQR began 18 years ago. This visual aid offers invaluable historical reporting opportunities, Bowen said. It is available on-line at aqr.aero
Researchers at the UNO Aviation Institute and the W. Frank Barton School of Business at WSU conduct the ratings annually. The AQR, as an industry standard, provides consumers and industry watchers a means to compare quality among airlines using objective performance-based data. It is a joint research project funded as part of faculty research activities at UNO and WSU.

"With the U.S. airline industry at rock-bottom in terms of overall performance, greater accountability is necessary. It is very difficult for air travel consumers to have a collective voice,” Bowen said. “The AQR.aero research team is providing new mechanisms for the everyday passenger to be heard.”

The air traveler can make a difference through participating in the aqr.aero research survey, the first of several new tools to aid the traveling public. Just go to aqr.aero and click on the ‘survey’ link. By participating, travelers will have access to the Web site’s future airline service problem reporting feature. This will also help researchers gather valuable data that may help slow the substantial decline in airline service performance that they reported this year.

The AQR scores for the largest airlines for 2007 resulted in the following ranking:
1. Air Tran
2. Jet Blue
3. Southwest
4. Northwest
5. Frontier
6. Continental
7. Alaska
8. United
9. American
10. Delta
11. US Airways
12. Mesa
13. SkyWest
14. Comair
15. American Eagle
16. Atlantic Southeast

Criteria included in the AQR are screened to meet two basic elements: They must be readily obtainable from published data sources for each airline, and they must be important to consumers regarding airline quality. The resulting criteria include areas such as baggage handling, customer complaints, denied boardings and on-time arrivals.

Other major industry findings in this year’s research study include:

Only four of the 16 airlines improved their AQR score. They were Air Tran, American Eagle, Atlantic Southeast and Mesa. The most improved airline was Mesa; it improved in three of the four categories – denied boardings, mishandled bags and customer complaints. Its on-time performance was similar to last year.

The airline that declined the most in performance was US Airways.



I'm glad to see that United didn't take the #16 spot. And no, I didn't change anyone's ranking. :)

Congradulations to the folks at Airtran!

Unfortunately, in the days of 'cheapest fare at any cost and $105-110/bbl. oil' these 'rankings' don't seem to mean that much anymore.

Example; Anyone know who was #1 in 'ontime performance' for the month of Feb?? Answer: Aloha.

(There's got to be some irony in there somewhere)

For what its worth.

DA
 
Hmmmm . . . . not sure what this says about the industry :rolleyes: . . . . .

I do have to say, though, that there has been a lot of improvement in the ATL Ramp operation over the past year or so, and they have hired some Agents that have more people skills than in previous years.

The glue that holds it all together, as we all know, is the Pilot group, but after three years of "old school contract negotiating tactics", management has destroyed much of the goodwill that used to exist.

The previous Cantract Offer from management showed their desire to operate AirTran like a Regional Airline . . . . one only has to look at the bottom of that AQR report to see where the regionals ranked.

TW
 
Last edited:
I kind of chuckled when I read this today but then had to wonder just how bad things have become in this industry. My beloved Continental is lower than it has been in years. Why I must ask? Our planes are clean, we run ontime more than most, we serve real hot food in both cabins, etc. etc., and we still get beat by 6 airlines? I really am confused. I'm sure there are things I don't know.
 
I kind of chuckled when I read this today but then had to wonder just how bad things have become in this industry. My beloved Continental is lower than it has been in years. Why I must ask? Our planes are clean, we run ontime more than most, we serve real hot food in both cabins, etc. etc., and we still get beat by 6 airlines? I really am confused. I'm sure there are things I don't know.

My guess is the delays and problems caused by your Newark hub would be my guess. Need to keep pushing Coex's 50 seaters over to CLE to unload the hub congestion. Airtran's overall performance has been greatly enhanced over the last few years as ATL has learned how to use the 5 runways pretty efficiently. I would bet Jetblue product is better than our except for the fact that JFK has alot more delays than ATL.

People really only want 2 things with their cheap ticket, to arrive ontime with their bags. In that respect, Airtran does a pretty good job.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top