Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

AirTran management makes in-person pitch to Midwest board

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/8538552.html

AirTran Promises Milwaukee Growth

Tom Murray


MILWAUKEE - Doug Hellebuyck prefers flying AirTran during monthly roundtrips between Atlanta and Milwaukee.

“The rates from AirTran are a lot cheaper,” Hellebuyck told TODAY’S TMJ4 reporter Tom Murray. “There’s more flights in and out, especially when I’m going to Atlanta.”

AirTran hopes to swing more public opinion in its favor when it reveals details of its takeover plan to the media. AirTran president Joe Leonard will address the Milwaukee Rotary Club Tuesday. The presentation is closed to the public, but it is open to reporters and cameras.

Leonard and top executives met behind closed doors with Midwest Airlines board members Monday. Midwest offered that meeting when AirTran-backed appointees won three seats on Midwest’s board of directors at a shareholders meeting last month.

Jeff Greene, a spokesperson for AirTran, revealed some details of that closed-door presentation to TODAY’S TMJ4. He said AirTran promises the following if it succeeds in acquiring Midwest:

- Maintain a flight schedule similar to the one Midwest flies to current destinations.
- Continue service on regional jets and turboprops offered under the brand Midwest Connect.
- Grow jobs and operations at the Milwaukee hub.

Loyal Midwest customers said that’s not enough to win them over. Losing Signature Service worries frequent fliers like Mark Zwicker. “You never know what they would change to run it their way,” Zwicker said after checking in for his Midwest flight. “Midwest has the best care in the air.”

Greene said AirTran’s presentation at the Rotary Club will be a condensed version of what was presented to the Midwest board Tuesday.

Greene said Monday’s meeting lasted approximately two hours, and Midwest board members asked “interesting” questions. He would not elaborate on the nature of those questions.
 
-"Continue service on regional jets and turboprops offered under the brand Midwest Connect."

"Airtran will eliminate service to small markets throughout Wisconsin, Kansas and Missouri. Airtran has stated that RJs do not work in a low cost business model"

"The Milwaukee hub offers a unique opportunity for Regional Jet feeder service that didn't exist in Atlanta due to runway and gate limitations."

So which is it Airtran????
 
So which is it Airtran????

the second point is a "midwest" point from their presentation. your third point answers the midwest point of view. i would imagine they would want to expand the operations with larger a/c.

who knows what they will do. some airtran pilots on here even suggested integrating the skyway folks onto the air tran list.
 
"Airtran will eliminate service to small markets throughout Wisconsin, Kansas and Missouri. Airtran has stated that RJs do not work in a low cost business model"

I haven't found this one yet. Was it in the presentation? Two items seem to contradict this: 1) the combined route map 2) the TMJ4 article "Continue service on regional jets and turboprops offered under the brand Midwest Connect."
 
I haven't found this one yet. Was it in the presentation? Two items seem to contradict this: 1) the combined route map 2) the TMJ4 article "Continue service on regional jets and turboprops offered under the brand Midwest Connect."

it is on the "5 midwest management criticism's not supported by facts" slide (p. 35 of the presentation).
 
Did anyone else notice the "new routes" proposed out of MKE?

San Juan, Cancun, Albuquerque, San Jose, Salt Lake City, Montreal and Vancouver.

But not out of ATL? Is this because of little competition?

perhaps san juan and cancun would be seasonal (run in the winter)?

the title of the slide is airtrans plans for "midwest" growth and shows nothing out of atlanta. they are possibly only showing their growth plans in MKE/MCI and not ATL.
 
Last edited:
the title of the slide is airtrans plans for "midwest" growth and shows nothing out of atlanta. they are possibly only showing their growth plans in MKE/MCI and not ATL.

Your probably right. :)

Pretty good presentation. You have to admit that together we would be a pretty bad-ass airline (maybe we should change our name to "Bad-Ass Airways" :D ). We would be a pretty tough airline too. Definitely stronger, and that means job security for all of us!

Now if we could only get the contract issue solved... :(

...
 
Last edited:
it is on the "5 midwest management criticism's not supported by facts" slide (p. 35 of the presentation).


Found it. Thanks.

But what about my other question? (#2) There are many WI and MI airports that are Connect routes. Several remain on slide #32, too. Then look at the last point of #36.

Aren't all of the "small market" routes in KS and MO just code shares? They just started the CRJ on some Connect routes, like San Antonio.

Just trying to sift through the chaff...
 

Latest resources

Back
Top