Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

AirTran halts expansion at DFW

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

AAflyer

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
1,493
AirTran halts expansion of D/FW schedule



08:46 PM CDT on Wednesday, October 19, 2005

By SUZANNE MARTA and ERIC TORBENSON / The Dallas Morning News

Officials at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport had high hopes when AirTran Airways Inc. agreed to expand its operations from one gate to four just two years ago.

Business travel was starting to show signs of strength, and airport officials hoped the Florida-based carrier would build a mini-hub to launch new low-fare service from North Texas with as many as 30 daily flights.

The carrier, which already flew between D/FW and its Atlanta hub, soon announced it would add flights to Orlando, Fla.; Baltimore; and Las Vegas.

But AirTran's plans at D/FW seem to have hit some bumps.

During the summer of 2004, AirTran launched two daily flights to Los Angeles and promised service later in the year to Fort Lauderdale and Tampa.

Service to the two Florida cities was never launched, and the carrier confirmed Wednesday that it would suspend service to Los Angeles in December.

Kevin Healy, AirTran's vice president for planning and marketing, said fuel was the primary reason for pulling the D/FW-Los Angeles flights.

AirTran officials hope to resume the service if jet fuel becomes more affordable, Mr. Healy said. "It was a difficult call to make" to D/FW officials to inform them of the decision. "But they're businessmen too, and they understand that you have to make a profit."

Still, even as AirTran is reducing service at D/FW, it's adding 7 flights from Chicago's Midway airport, a move Mr. Healy said wasn't a big factor in his D/FW decision.

Industry analysts said Wednesday that while fuel has staunched expansion plans for airlines around the country, fierce competition from American Airlines Inc. also played into AirTran's decision at D/FW.

"I think competition with American was overwhelming," said Ray Neidl, an analyst with Calyon Securities.

After AirTran announced its service starting at $99 each way to Los Angeles, Fort Worth-based American announced it would match the low fares on its 39 flights to the five airports it serves in the area.

At the time, Mr. Healy described American's move as overkill and said, "It's hard to imagine that our two flights are causing this much of a response."

The competition was a boon for D/FW, which saw its demand for Los Angeles service grow 68 percent, as customers jumped at the lower fares.

Research by Harrell Associates showed that similar fares that spring were closer to $150 each way.

But in just 12 months, fuel prices nearly doubled, presenting tough choices for all carriers.

Industry consultant Michael Roach of Roach and Sbarra Associates in San Francisco said fuel prices made it even more difficult for AirTran to take on the world's largest carrier at its biggest hub.

With 850 daily flights, American commands 84 percent of passenger traffic at D/FW.

Gerard Arpey, American's chairman and chief executive, said AirTran's move wasn't "a seminal schedule change."

"We are reducing capacity and consolidating traffic and so are a lot of other airlines," Mr. Arpey said. "I see that as more of a tactical decision."

Kevin Cox, D/FW's chief operating officer, said AirTran officials have assured him that they remain "very interested in growing and expanding in this market when there are less cost pressures."

But Mr. Cox said Dallas-based Southwest Airlines Co. played a role in slowing AirTran's North Texas expansion – not American.

Ever since Southwest announced it would fight to repeal the Wright amendment restrictions on long-haul flying from Dallas Love Field, AirTran has held back on growth plans, Mr. Cox said.

"They planned to use four gates, and now they're only using three," he said. "This cloud of uncertainty [over the Wright amendment] has chilled the marketplace."

Beth Harbin, a Southwest spokeswoman, said AirTran's move had nothing to do with its stance on Wright. "The cost of jet fuel today is something none of us counted on," she said.

Mr. Cox said high jet fuel costs, combined with the renewed Wright debate, makes it unlikely D/FW will soon find tenants to fill its 22 gates left idle when Delta Airlines Inc. shut its hub in January.

Attracting more service from low-cost carriers has been a priority for D/FW.

"If you take one or more of these [factors] away, then maybe we'll see an AirTran or JetBlue competing very effectively at D/FW," Mr. Cox said.

It wasn't clear whether American would continue to keep its lower pricing to Los Angeles after AirTran departs in December, although low fares were available Wednesday on American's Web site into next year.

American spokesman Tim Wagner said it still faces competition on the route from US Airways Inc., Frontier Airlines Inc. United Airlines Inc., and other carriers that offer one-stop service.

"We will price competitively," Mr. Wagner said.

E-mail [email protected] and [email protected]
__________________
 
So, AA is just supposed to let someone waltz in and take revenue without a fight? What would AirTran do if AA started up a small operation in ATL to cities other than it's current hubs? TC
 
AAflyer said:
AirTran halts expansion of D/FW schedule



"We are reducing capacity and consolidating traffic and so are a lot of other airlines," Mr. Arpey said. "I see that as more of a tactical decision."

Kevin Cox, D/FW's chief operating officer, said AirTran officials have assured him that they remain "very interested in growing and expanding in this market when there are less cost pressures."

But Mr. Cox said Dallas-based Southwest Airlines Co. played a role in slowing AirTran's North Texas expansion – not American.

Ever since Southwest announced it would fight to repeal the Wright amendment restrictions on long-haul flying from Dallas Love Field, AirTran has held back on growth plans, Mr. Cox said.

"They planned to use four gates, and now they're only using three," he said. "This cloud of uncertainty [over the Wright amendment] has chilled the marketplace."

Mr. Cox said high jet fuel costs, combined with the renewed Wright debate, makes it unlikely D/FW will soon find tenants to fill its 22 gates left idle when Delta Airlines Inc. shut its hub in January.

Attracting more service from low-cost carriers has been a priority for D/FW.

"If you take one or more of these [factors] away, then maybe we'll see an AirTran or JetBlue competing very effectively at D/FW," Mr. Cox said.

It wasn't clear whether American would continue to keep its lower pricing to Los Angeles after AirTran departs in December, although low fares were available Wednesday on American's Web site into next year.

American spokesman Tim Wagner said it still faces competition on the route from US Airways Inc., Frontier Airlines Inc. United Airlines Inc., and other carriers that offer one-stop service.

"We will price competitively," Mr. Wagner said.

ATTENTION LADIES and GENTLEMEN---Spin master Kevin Cox talks out of both sides of his mouth. Watch with awe and wonder.

Is it fuel price and competition or Wright Amendment fear and terrible uncertainty that affects Airtran's fare setting and current gate usage?

I think the answer is in bold. Thanks Mr. Wagner for giving us the info Kevin Cox has no interest in offering. Probably, and I'm going out on a limb here, its due to competition from one or more airlines. You be the judge.
 
Last edited:
I live in MSP, had heard on the news AIrTran was pulling out. Anybody at AirTran heard something FACTUAL about this.

AA
 
I believe Mr Cox wakes up in the morning, trips over his dog and blames SWA..That man just doesn't like us, yet he wants us at DFW. He just doesn't get it. AA717driver has it right, AA should not role over and let Air Tran eat their lunch, AirTran tried, they failed, they will try again. AA is not Delta, which is why SWA wants no part of DFW. AA at Love, we can handle. Isn't this a fun business.
 
We are NOT pulling ot of MSP, infact you can now go MSP to MDW. Yes we still do ATL and MCO from MSP.
 
AFcitrus said:
The real loosers here are the people of DFW who used to get low fares to LAX.


Oh come on now. Why don't you fly for free so they can even have lower fares? (if you care so much about the "people.")


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top