Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then I guess you failed to read to the end where he says:Apparently, you haven't read the Ruling from the DRC.
After the testimony from both sides, The Arbitrator found:
" . . . The Company further threatened to go to what was described as 'Plan B' if ALPA did not agree to Southwest Airlines 'take it or leave it' offer. Testimony
presented at the hearing indicates that the 'Plan B' that was spoken of was that
AirTran would be operated separately from Southwest Airlines following the
merger and would not be integrated in to Southwest Airlines in the future.
The implementation of this 'Plan B' was that eventually the AirTran side
of the Company would be allowed to 'die' and then the Southwest Airlines side
of the business would absorb those parts of AirTran that it wanted, such as
the valuable DC/La Guardia NYC slots and gates and AirTran's international
destinations such as Mexico and the Caribbean.
I posted the part that was germaine to the discussion we were having, which was "Whether or not threats were made to the AAI Pilots".
Clearly, the Arbitrator stated that our jobs were indeed threatened.
Apparently, you now want to change the topic to "Should they have taken SIA #1?" which is, of course, a completely different subject.
You'll have to debate that one with someone else.
Then I guess you failed to read to the end where he says:
"The arbitrator rejects ALPA claim that the SLI was a contract of of adhesion"
"There is no meaningful evidence supporting ALPA claim they had no choice."
and most important:
"ALPA gambled wrong"
Dang it Ty! What the heck do the gall dang Germans have to with anything?
The point is, you can SAY they had a gun to your head all you want, but the TRUTH is THE arbitrator disagrees with that clich? by stating "There is no meaningful evidence supporting ALPA claim they had no choice" and "it was hard bargaining" and best "ALPA gambled wrong". Unfortunate that ALPA gambled with pilots livelihoods. Maybe there is some sort of tort in the decision...Sure we had a choice, just like when you get robbed at gun-point, you have a choice.
What's your point?