VNugget
suck squeeze bang blow
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2002
- Posts
- 809
I have just realized I don't know the first thing about the pitot-static system.
Alright, so according to Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators, as the speed of the free airstream increases, the dynamic pressure increases and the static pressure decreases, as per Bernoulli's law; they always add up to the same number, which is the total pressure. So far so good.
Furthermore, at the stagnation point in front of the pitot tube, the local flow (and therefore the local dynamic pressure) drop to zero. The local static pressure is equal to the total pressure, and the difference between the free-stream static and local static pressures is equal to the free-stream dynamic pressure. So far so good.
So the pitot tube measures that total pressure, and the static port measures the free stream static pressure, which decreases with velocity. As velocity increases and static pressure decreaess, the difference between the total pressure (from the pitot tube) and the static pressure (from the static port) increases, and this difference is equal to the dynamic pressure, and is measured by the airspeed indicator. So far so good?
Not so fast!
If these inferences are carried out to the ir logical conclusion, the altimeter reading, which is done from the static port, would decrease as soon as the plane starts moving (even on the ground when there's a headwind) due to the drop in static pressure, so the altimeter couldn't possibly work offf the static port. The altimeter would actually have to work off the pitot tube, which measures total pressure and stays constant throughout all velocity changes.
Obviously, that is not the case.
What gives?

Alright, so according to Aerodynamics for Naval Aviators, as the speed of the free airstream increases, the dynamic pressure increases and the static pressure decreases, as per Bernoulli's law; they always add up to the same number, which is the total pressure. So far so good.
Furthermore, at the stagnation point in front of the pitot tube, the local flow (and therefore the local dynamic pressure) drop to zero. The local static pressure is equal to the total pressure, and the difference between the free-stream static and local static pressures is equal to the free-stream dynamic pressure. So far so good.
So the pitot tube measures that total pressure, and the static port measures the free stream static pressure, which decreases with velocity. As velocity increases and static pressure decreaess, the difference between the total pressure (from the pitot tube) and the static pressure (from the static port) increases, and this difference is equal to the dynamic pressure, and is measured by the airspeed indicator. So far so good?
Not so fast!
If these inferences are carried out to the ir logical conclusion, the altimeter reading, which is done from the static port, would decrease as soon as the plane starts moving (even on the ground when there's a headwind) due to the drop in static pressure, so the altimeter couldn't possibly work offf the static port. The altimeter would actually have to work off the pitot tube, which measures total pressure and stays constant throughout all velocity changes.
Obviously, that is not the case.
What gives?