Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airplane Crash Kills Father and Son

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

kilroy

http://www.filecabi.net/v
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Posts
439
Near Winona 11/26/04
[font=Verdana,Arial]Airplane Crash Kills Father and Son[/font]
Email to a FriendPrinter Friendly Version &ltscript&gtif(document.layers) {document.write('&ltSCR' + 'IPTlanguage=JavaScript1.1SRC=/Global/ad.asp?rnd=39128617048263&amptype=single&amptg=News&ampsrc=aff&ampsz=180x150&ampcallType=script&gt&lt/SCR'+ 'IPT&gt'); document.close();}&lt/script&gtcoreAdsCreate('180x150', 'aff');
A 38 year -old pilot and his 9 year old son were killed instantly in an airplane crash in Montomery County, Mississippi Thanksgiving Day. The pilot was buzzing his father in law's home, where there was a family gathering for Thanksgiving. They all watched in horror, as the single engine Cessna, clipped some power lines, and crashed at the edge of a pond, behind the house.

Tim Mitchell, and his son Adam died in the crash. The Cessna 195 had been made in 1953, but airplanes have to be certified as airworthy every year. Mitchell was a self employed logger who had only been flying two years. This was his second airplane. The crash was just off U.S. Highway 82, some seven miles east of Winona.


Could you imagine ... killing your son with stupidity...How sad.. Poor family
 
Stupidity hurts. Speed kills.

Running out of altitude, airspeed, and ideas all at the same time bends metal, changes lives, and knocks out power...even those of us who get paid to fool around down low don't go doing it for kicks. It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt.
 
Another example of lack of common sence when it is needed most.
 
This is so sad. My heart hurts for all involved.
Power lines and stand pipes have caused me a lot of hurt over the years.
 
I think a lot of us would be hypocrites if we said something about the actions of the pilot in the first post of this thread. Fact is, if you don't do a good job scoping out your low pass, you lose. Fact is, negligent actions cause needless tragedy. Fact is, we all have done something and survived it...then thought about our actions afterwards and chose not to do such things in the future.

Accidents while making low passes are not relegated to lowly private pilots killing their sons or co-workers. This pilot was high time, probably military experienced and worked at a large brand name cargo company. Once again, I'd be calling the kettle black if I picked on the actions of this pilot...so the report below is posted to provide food for thought. THINK.

CHI01FA256HISTORY OF FLIGHT

On August 4, 2001, at 1535 central daylight time, a Beech E55, N30WS, was destroyed when it impacted the terrain and was consumed by fire near Rensselaer, Indiana. The 14 CFR Part 91 personal flight departed the Jasper County Airport (RZL), Rensselaer, Indiana, at 1530, and was en route to Collierville, Tennessee. The pilot and one passenger survived the initial impact and fire. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed. No flight plan was filed.

Witnesses reported the airplane made a low pass over a farmstead when the airplane impacted the top of a barn. The airplane traveled about 700 feet before impacting the ground in a bean field. The airplane skidded on the ground for about 100 feet and was subsequently consumed by fire.

A witness reported the airplane had departed RZL to the southwest at a low altitude. The farmstead where the accident occurred is located about five miles to the southwest of RZL and is owned by the brother of the pilot.

Two people were in the swimming pool located about 10 feet from the northwest edge of the barn when the airplane over flew the farmstead. They reported the airplane's engines were loud when the airplane hit the top of the barn that was about 27 feet in height.

Emergency responders arrived at the scene and transported the victims to the local hospital where they were later transported to hospitals in Fort Wayne, Indiana. The passenger was pronounced dead about 22 hours after the accident occurred. The pilot was hospitalized and treated for burns and impact injuries, but was pronounced dead on September 4, 2001.

PERSONNEL INFORMATION

The pilot held an airline transport pilot certificate with single engine and multi-engine land, and instrument ratings. He held a First Class medical certificate dated April 9, 2001. The pilot reported his total flight time was 15,500 hours and had flown 300 hours in the last six months during his last medical examination. The pilot flew professionally for a major cargo operator, and he held type ratings in the DC-9 and DC-10. The pilot's logbooks were not recovered during the course of the investigation.

AIRCRAFT INFORMATION

The airplane was a twin-engine Beech E55, Baron, serial number TE-960. The airplane seated six and had a maximum gross weight of 5,300 pounds. The engines were 285 horsepower Continental IO-520C-7 engines. The airplane's logbooks were not recovered during the course of the investigation and the airplane's flight hours and maintenance history is unknown.

The airplane was topped off with 60.5 gallons of fuel on August 8, 2001. The airplane held 136 gallons of usable fuel.

METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS

At 1453, the surface observation reported at Valparaiso (VPZ), Indiana, located about 36 miles to the north of the accident site were: winds 020 degrees at 5 knots, sky clear, temperature 84 degrees F, dew point 66 degrees F, altimeter 30.05.

WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION

The airplane wreckage was located in a bean field on County Road 1100 south approximately .5 mile east of County Road 1080 west, in Jasper County Indiana. The airplane initially impacted the top of a barn approximately 27 feet in height.

The wreckage path was on a heading of 183 degrees. Wreckage debris, including pieces of the left wing fuel bladder, was found in an area immediately south of the barn. A piece of engine nacelle skin and aluminum honeycomb material was found 193 feet from the barn. The left wing outboard of the engine nacelle and the empennage were found 30 feet apart and about 490 feet along the wreckage path. The right propeller was found with one blade buried in the ground at 698 feet along the wreckage path. The right engine was located 791 feet along the wreckage path. The main wreckage, which included the fuselage, cockpit, right wing, and the left wing out to the engine nacelle, was located about 810 feet along the wreckage path. The left engine was found about 900 feet from the initial impact point.

The left outboard wing section had a black transfer mark on the top surface of the wing. The gap seals of the leading edges of the left and right horizontal stabilizers were made of a black rubber material.

A separate section of the leading edge of the left wing that contained the cutout for the stall warning vane was found near the left wing. The section exhibited chordwise scrape marks on the lower side of the skin just below and aft of the stall warning vane. No crushing was exhibited on the leading edge of this section of wing.

The fuselage was found upright with the nose of the wreckage heading north. The right wing was found attached to the fuselage, but it was consumed by fire. The left nacelle and inboard wing were attached to the fuselage. The fuselage, cabin, and cockpit were destroyed by fire. The landing gear and the flaps were found in the up position.

The right propeller blades exhibited minimal leading edge damage or chordwise scratching. One blade was bent aft about six inches with no blade twist. The other blade exhibited no blade twist or bending.

The left propeller remained attached to the engine. One blade was bent forward about 90 degrees and the other blade was bent aft. The blades exhibited minimal leading edge damage or chordwise scratching.

The left engine exhibited valve train continuity to all cylinders, and the accessory drive gears turned when the crankshaft was rotated. Thumb compression was observed on all cylinders except number 5 cylinder. The number 5 piston moved up and down in the cylinder when the crankshaft was rotated. Both magnetos were broken off the engine. The left magneto produced a spark on all six towers. The right magneto was not located. Fuel was found in the fuel distribution valve.

The left engine exhibited valve train continuity to all cylinders, and the accessory drive gears turned when the crankshaft was rotated. Thumb compression was observed on all cylinders. Both magnetos produced spark from all six towers. Fuel was found in the fuel distribution valve.

The examination of the flight control cables revealed the elevator cables exhibited continuity from the cockpit to the elevator bellcrank that was found with the main wreckage. The rudder cables exhibited continuity from the cockpit to the aft fuselage where both rudder cables were found separated with signatures consistent with tensile overload. The corresponding rudder cables that were found attached to the rudder attach terminals were also found separated with signatures consistent with tensile overload. The aileron cables exhibited continuity from the cockpit to the left aileron bellcrank swaged terminals. The left aileron bellcrank had one cable still attached to it, and the other bellcrank end was broken. The right aileron bellcrank had melted during the on-ground fire, but both cables had the swaged terminals and the bellcrank ends still attached to the cables.
 
You submit that this was a highly experienced pilot, but I see nothing in that report that suggests that to be the case. Fifteen thousand hours of flying in a DC-10 don't make one qualified to fly a bonanza at low level any more than it qualifies one to fly the space shuttle, a j-3 cub, or an F-18. In fact, in my experience, the heavy experience can be a liability in a light airplane. Low level flying is something else entirely...just how much low level, off-field experience in light airplanes in terrain did this person have? Completing an instrument approach doesn't really count.

We all have scars. But always beware of scars gained in battles in which you should never have fought.
 
Aviation in itself is not inherently dangerous. But to an even greater degree than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of any carelessness, incapacity or neglect.
 
avbug said:
Stupidity hurts. Speed kills.

Running out of altitude, airspeed, and ideas all at the same time bends metal, changes lives, and knocks out power...even those of us who get paid to fool around down low don't go doing it for kicks. It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt.
This seems incredibly harsh considering the pain the family must be suffering now. Sure, people make mistakes. The result of this one is tragic. It seems a bit of compassion for the grieving family might be in order.

Maybe I'm reading you wrong, but the "those of us" part even sounds a bit arrogant and ill-informed. People DO get a kick out of flying low.


FN FAL said:
I think a lot of us would be hypocrites if we said something about the actions of the pilot in the first post of this thread. Fact is, if you don't do a good job scoping out your low pass, you lose. Fact is, negligent actions cause needless tragedy. Fact is, we all have done something and survived it...then thought about our actions afterwards and chose not to do such things in the future.

Accidents while making low passes are not relegated to lowly private pilots killing their sons or co-workers. This pilot was high time, probably military experienced and worked at a large brand name cargo company. Once again, I'd be calling the kettle black if I picked on the actions of this pilot...so the report below is posted to provide food for thought. THINK.
You're right - - whether a self-employed logger with two years flying experience, or a career aviator with thousands of hours, the result of the mistake is the same. Physics is no respecter of persons.

The NTSB report you posted only scratches the surface of the tragedy. In this case, the pilot and his wife were bound for home after having spent some time with her parents. One final pass over her parents' farm and they would be on their way home. The parents watched their son-in-law clip the barn, and the ensuing crash. He wasn't killed in the crash, but died days later from the burns he sustained pulling her out of the burning wreckage. Talk about a great way to ruin a visit with the family.


While both of these accidents, and numerous others like them, serve as stark reminders of the consequencces of poor judgment, they also involve real people, real families, real tragedies. Let's try to find a place in the lesson for some real compassion.
 
TonyC said:
You're right - - whether a self-employed logger with two years flying experience, or a career aviator with thousands of hours, the result of the mistake is the same. Physics is no respecter of persons...

...While both of these accidents, and numerous others like them, serve as stark reminders of the consequencces of poor judgment, they also involve real people, real families, real tragedies. Let's try to find a place in the lesson for some real compassion.
I saw the light one night.

It was the reflection of my nav light that I caught out of the corner of my eye from the side of a telephone pole at the intersection of 27 and 36 on a private owned/public use airport. It was a low pass down the runway after dropping jumpers off on a night jump. A low pass down the runway seems harmless enough right? Except it was at a grass strip airport that only has reflectors on the 36/18 runways. I may have misjudged the runway centerline and was offset slightly to the north a bit...probably as a result of fearing contact with the hangers that line the south side of the runway 27/09.

I'll never be able to do a low pass like the one pilot we had working for us before I got there...he went on to be a check airman at Skyways and on to bigger and better things from there. Legend is, he came down the runway and did a roll...just before he got fired from flying jumpers. He's better than me, I'll admit that!

Regardless, most of us will learn from our mistakes, some will not learn or be given a second chance. Those without sin can cast the first stone...but I would rather ride with the sinners. If I have to explain, you wouldn't understand anyway.
 
Maybe I'm reading you wrong, but the "those of us" part even sounds a bit arrogant and ill-informed. People DO get a kick out of flying low.

I don't know if you're reading it right or wrong, and it really doesn't matter. My observation, as one who has been employed to fly low since being a teenager, including working under powerlines, has been that it's no playground. People like cocaine, too, but that doesn't make doing coke a good idea. Who cares if people "get a kick" out of it?

One final pass over her parents' farm and they would be on their way home.
It only takes once.

Let's try to find a place in the lesson for some real compassion.
I lose friends, co-workers, and associates every year due to low level crashes, and have for many years. How about let's be touchy feely and have a group hug, while we're at it. The family didn't write here or post this information, and I wasn't aware we were looking to sign a group sympathy card to send to the family. What was posted was a description of someone doing something really foolish, that killed the person and his wife, and endangered those on the ground. Stupidity kills. Again.

We did recently have someone write in looking for answers to questions about his Uncle's crash. I responded to that with direct statements of condolence, and then didn't mince words in analyzing the information provided. I told him outright that it appeared his uncle had made mistakes, that it appeared pilot error, that a difinitive answer might never be formulated, that the only information tendered yet existed in the media and a NTSB preliminary report, that it might not be what he wanted to hear, but that's what all that is currently available supports. No sugar coating, no deception, the truth. It's a nasty habit, but one in which I firmly believe.

No great enjoyment to tell someone on thanksgiving that their relative killed themself and their friends, but that's the bottom line. A spade is a spade.

Those without sin can cast the first stone...but I would rather ride with the sinners. If I have to explain, you wouldn't understand anyway.
No need to explain, but I surely don't understand. I've known folks that did these very things, and the bottom line is that I won't fly with them, nor let them in my aircraft. These are dangerous acts, which show a lack of judgement, even a flaw in character. These acts kill people. I don't fly with pilots who do rash, unwise things, and I don't skydive with people who cut corners, or do other things that are commonly accepted in that industry.

I recently had a conversation about this very topic (and more) with an older gentleman who had just purchased an aircraft. The upshot of the discussion was that he felt he had enough training, to which I disagreed. I urged him to seek more training in the strongest terms I could, and ended our conversation by telling him that his attitude would get him killed.

Three days later he stacked the aircraft up in a tree in front of his house.

Stupidity hurts. Sometimes very badly.
 
avbug said:
...even those of us who get paid to fool around down low don't go doing it for kicks.
TonyC said:
Maybe I'm reading you wrong, but the "those of us" part even sounds a bit arrogant and ill-informed. People DO get a kick out of flying low.
avbug said:
I don't know if you're reading it right or wrong, and it really doesn't matter. My observation, as one who has been employed to fly low since being a teenager, including working under powerlines, has been that it's no playground. People like cocaine, too, but that doesn't make doing coke a good idea. Who cares if people "get a kick" out of it?
Looks like I was reading you correctly - - you are being arrogant, and you don't seem to understand that some people actually enjoy flying low.

I didn't say it was right or wrong to fly low - - the results speak for themselves. To suggest, as you did, that people don't fly low for kicks, though, is as ridiculous as saying people don't (to borrow your example) "do" coke for kicks. Of course they do it for kicks - - it can't be for their good health!
 
Clearly you did not understand, nor did you read very well. I never said people don't do it for kicks. They do. I stated that doing so, and getting hurt, is stupid. The person who is the subject of this thread did so for kicks, and is dead. The results, as you so succinctly put, speak for themselves.

You take exception to my statement that those of us who fly low level professionally don't do it for kicks. As a professional who has been professionally trained and flies professionally at low level, I don't do it for kicks; I do it for money, for a living. Do I enjoy it? I wouldn't do it if I didn't, but there's a big difference between thrill seeking among powerlines, and working at low level for a valid, professional reason.

Flying low level for kicks and the thrill is a little like taking recreational drugs. I have a hard time holding out much sympathy to one who does it, and buys the farm. Those of us who are employed to do it in the day to day life, who have the training and experience to be there and still fully understand the risks, see it in a different light. It's not a playground. Flying low, working low, isn't about getting cheap thrills. If I were not being paid to perform a function that requires low level flight, I wouldn't fly low. Yes, I enjoy it, but I have a legitimate, valid reason to be there, and I'm not there for thrills. Big difference.

You find that arrogant? You gotta be kidding.

Do you find the fact that I flow low arrogant? That I do it professionally as arrogant? The fact that I know the risks arrogant? The fact that I believe those who do it simply for a thrill to be stupid, arrogant? Or the fact that as a professional with low level training and experience, who understands the risks and believes that it isn't something to be doing for a thrill, to be arrogant? In other words, you really find someone who has a leg to stand on regarding the topic, who speaks from experience regarding someone who paid the price for thrill seeking with a clear, difinitive public result, to be arrogant for stating the facts? That's rich. I guess you got me there, TonyC. Ouch.

Of course they do it for kicks - - it can't be for their good health!
Dunno about you, but that pretty closely matches my definition of stupidity. People knowing something is bad for them, do it anyway. Stupid.

And you call that arrogant. Interesting...

If I'm assigned to work in a field, I drive to the field. I walk in the field. I look it over. I drive around it. I look for obstructions, paths in and out, susceptible materials or crops nearby. Animal life. Prevailing winds. I make an experienced observation of what will be required to fly that field. Upon arrival at the field, I fly around the field, noting obstructions, noting any changes that may have occured (illegal taps into powerlines, tractors or circle irrigation equipment that's recently been placed, drilling rigs, whatever) since I was there, check the perimeter, and then when satisfied, fly a preplanned pattern in the field based on current meteorological conditions, and the requirements of that particular assignment. This, as opposed to busting down over somebodies house and buzzing for a thrill. See the difference? Probably not.

When dispatched to a fire, I check charts for local hazards. I coordinate with those on the ground for hazards, and often for a dedicated aerial platform over the fire that's checking it for hazards. A NOTAM is put up over the site. I fly to the site, in contact with a dispatch center that will immediately start a search for me every 15 minutes or less if I don't communicate, who is talking to whatever agency has the airspace where I'll be flying. I'm also talking at the same time to ATC. I'm also talking at the same time to ground units, as well as talking at the same time to air units. I may have four or five different radios going. My head is on a swivel for traffic. I arrive at the site and begin looking, even before getting on scene, for winds, ingress, escapes, hazards. I overfly the site, look it over, fly around it, and fly my line and escape route. I arm my systems to be ready for an emergency situation immediately. I often fly a dry, practice run with supervision, and then I go in. All this for one quick run.

Is it a thrill? Sometimes my feet are numb when I come out, from pressing on the rudder pedals. Sometimes, when it's really rough, my legs are shaking from the workout when I come out. Sometimes it's a no-brainer, often as not it's a rattler; I get shaken from beginng to end, and I've come away from the drop shaking. I don't call it a thrill. It's not an emergency, it's not a thrill, it's not a joy ride. It's my job, and one which I believe, and those who evaluate me regularly clearly believe, I do very well. That's the nature of being a professional.

You see this as arrogant. I see it as something else, and couldn't give a stuff what you think. I have a leg to stand on. I see someone who busts into a scene or location and dives down to impress friends or family, who shrieks over the ground for a thrill, who decides to go play tom cruise wannabe or show off what he or she really doesn't know and then kills himself, his wife, family, spectators, whomever, as someone who is demonstrating stupidity. And so it is. As you noted, the facts speak for themselves. That's not arrogance, mate. It's calling a spade a spade, by someone who knows what he is talking about. And I do. You read about it in an article on the internet. I know friends and associates who die every year on the job down low. Every year. It's not academic. It's not arrogant. It's personal.

I don't like seeing people die. I don't like reading about people dying. I don't like people doing stupid things that kill other people or themselves. I don't know if you've ever stood over a burning wreckage and put it out with your own hands after a low level crash, or watched your friends go in, burn, before your very eyes. I don't know you. Perhaps you have. But I have experienced those things. And it's personal. I don't care to watch any more of them, or read about them. And yes, when I see someone do it for a thrill who then loses their life and takes that of others, I very much believe it's unnecessary, it's stupid, and I'm not going to play politically correct and say otherwise. Stuidity kills.

Perhaps after you've stained your hands and your clothing in blood, smoke, fire, burning fuel, cut yourself trying to get into the wreckage, and seen the carnage first hand, awakened n the middle of the night in a cold sweat because you suddenly realized for the first time that you're not going to see Steve or Jeff or Clarence again, and why...it won't be academic, and you will have the moral high ground to look down on your nose at me for feeling the way I do. Perhaps after you go year after year losing friends and co-workers and associates to this very same thing, after you've done it yourself and know what's involved and the risks and rewards, you'll have the credibility to step up and call me arrogant.

Until that day, mind your own business. You think the dead become saints because they're dead? I don't. I don't care about political correctness. Stupidity is stupidity, weather the dead are gone or not. You want touchy feely, go join a rainbow group or chain yourself to a tree in the forest or throw vials of blood on fur stoles. I'm more interested in seeing people grow up to see their children grow old. Seeing people not make headlines. Seeing airplanes that land as many times as they takeoff. I preach safety, caution, every day. One might say I'm a missionary fo the subject. I'm passionate about it, and have preached aviation safety tirelessly year after year after year. You think that's arrogant. Fine. You, and the high horse you rode in on, mate. Doesn't deter me from where I stand, nor will it. Stupidity kills. My hope is that it doesn't kill another. It will, but I will not be silent in protesting the fact, or trying to keep it from happening.

If just one person who wants to make that thrilling ride thinks twice, then a lifetime of effort is worth it.
 
Last edited:
avbug said:
Clearly you did not understand, nor did you read very well. I never said people don't do it for kicks.
Perhaps you didn't intend to, but you did. When you said "even those of us" you implied that nobody does it for kicks, not even you. Since it was just an implication, and not an outright statement, I began by trying to clarify your statement. Your response was directly in line with the implication. Your righteous indignation was very loud and clear.

avbug said:
Do you find the fact that I flow low arrogant? That I do it professionally as arrogant? The fact that I know the risks arrogant? The fact that I believe those who do it simply for a thrill to be stupid, arrogant? Or the fact that as a professional with low level training and experience, who understands the risks and believes that it isn't something to be doing for a thrill, to be arrogant? In other words, you really find someone who has a leg to stand on regarding the topic, who speaks from experience regarding someone who paid the price for thrill seeking with a clear, difinitive public result, to be arrogant for stating the facts? That's rich. I guess you got me there, TonyC. Ouch.
What I find arrogant is that you seem to think you're too experienced, too wise, too good to ever make a deadly mistake.

avbug said:
You think the dead become saints because they're dead?
Who's not reading?
 
Alright you two, knock it off!

There are some important things being left on the curb here.

Tony - you called Avbug arrogant because he used a collective term that included himself - a right that he has earned as a result of years of experience.

Avbug, You know you're right about the difference between an aerial work operation requiring low level ops and a joyride. Leave it at that.

The bottom line is that people died because a pilot thought he could do something he couldn't. No great mystery here. It happens all the time. Pilot flies into weather he thought he could handle - kills self and five family members. Pilot slides off end of runway after landing long - four injured. The list of familiar headlines goes on and on but they all have that one thing in common - the pilot made an error in judgment. It happens and it can't be cured with training - you can't teach judgment.

I think what Avbug is saying is that you can't make a judgment without thinking first and the most basic difference between a joyrider and a working pilot is that one is thinking, while the other is not.

That difference is the point that that should be emphasized, IMO. Arrogance has nothing to do with it.
 
Last edited:
This goes back to a term I have heard, called the "Cone of Stupidity", that extends upwards from any house or structure or boat where you have friends or relatives.

Pilots want to go do things like buzz their friends/families houses, or do steep turns around it, etc, things they were not normally do, but hey its family, so gotta put on an airshow.

These are unfortunately not uncommon events. I can think of two other just off the top of my head

In 2000, an F-16 pilot crashed on his inlaws farm.
http://archives.cnn.com/2000/US/08/29/f16.crash/
They are outside watching, and he flies low enough to hit the ground and a barn.

I think about 10-15 years ago, a T-37 with two IPs crashes, apparently stalled during a steep during around relatives house of one of the pilots
 
Then you have a real famous one with Ozzie Ozbourne's guitarist (forgot the name) back in the early 80s where he took a ride on a Bonanza (I think), then clipped Ozzie's tour bus when they got too low. The plane then slammed into an adjacent house. Pilot was high on the white stuff, as i recall.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom