Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Airbus plant in USA

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

720degpersec

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Posts
71
WASHINGTON - The parent company of European aircraft maker Airbus, seeking to better compete with Boeing for a lucrative Air Force contract to build military refueling tankers, announced Wednesday it has selected Mobile, Ala., over three other Southern sites for a $600 million factory.


Airbus seems to be helping the US economy....right guys ?
 
IT would help jobs in that part of the country, but the profits would be going to the euro folks. I also think that airbus would also consider building a plant here because it will be cheaper, labor/ resouces. They dont care to help our economy.
 
jws717 said:
IT would help jobs in that part of the country, but the profits would be going to the euro folks. I also think that airbus would also consider building a plant here because it will be cheaper, labor/ resouces. They dont care to help our economy.

Whining again ? I don't know of any Boeing plants in Europe...
 
720degpersec said:
Whining again ? I don't know of any Boeing plants in Europe...

But then again, there is a lot of European content in Boeing aircraft. Every current-generation 737 has CFM engines which are partly the handiwork of SNECMA of France. Rolls-Royce engines are European, too, and they are found on 757's, 767's, 747's and 777's. :cool:
 
720degpersec said:
Whining again ? I don't know of any Boeing plants in Europe...

Doesn't sound like whining to me, just that he may have a deeper understanding of how an AirBus factory in the U.S. will and will not help the economy than you do.
 
Hose A. Jiminez said:
Doesn't sound like whining to me, just that he may have a deeper understanding of how an AirBus factory in the U.S. will and will not help the economy than you do.

Ok, first, a plant in Mobile will employ a majority of US employees. I don't hear GM hiring a lot do you ?

Second, Airbus spends $5.5 billion with US suppliers. That is 40 percent of the company's worldwide procurement.

A deeper understanding than I do, right ?
 
It will be a sad day, and one that will go down in infamy if our military sinks so low as to purchase from airbus and not our own Boeing.

Fly Boeing Jets!!!
 
Mr Hat said:
Prehaps this is why......
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/229451_airbuilt22.html

"All of the airlines are probably already in compliance," Federal Aviation Administration spokesman Les Dorr said yesterday in Washington. The agency estimated it would cost carriers $522,000 to print stickers with the location where planes were "finally assembled" and place them on the placards in 6,559 aircraft.

Holy Crap, an average of $75 per aircraft to put a flippin' decal on a safety card. Although I'd bet that Airbus would come out ahead even if they paid double that for the entire world's fleet of aircraft. I'm guessing there might be another reason they want to build jets in Alabama.

The downward spiral tightens...
 
Last edited:
Where did you pull that number out of?

The two most costly things on an aircraft are engines and avionics, they are both made in the USA.

Are you saying 60% of the rivits come from outside the USA?
 
Melboune Florida was on the final 4 list until yesterday..it looks like the plant will be in Mobile, they have other contracts and manufacturing there for the coast guard....
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top