Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Air tragedy puts focus on big, small carrier ties

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

DieselDragRacer

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Posts
11,056
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-02-01-crash_N.htm


"Code sharing is a significant issue and something we believe is worthy of examination," Hersman said in her opening remarks.

In the Buffalo accident and other recent crashes, NTSB investigators have found that regional carriers flying for major airlines often have lower safety standards.

Colgan, for example, did not have a program to study safety data from individual flights in an attempt to spot safety problems before they cause accidents. Such data gathering takes place at all the major airlines.

Hersman said that the NTSB will also hold a forum on the issue of pilot and air-traffic controller "professionalism."

In the Buffalo crash, the pilots made a series of mistakes and had a lengthy conversation about personal matters before the accident. Such conversations are prohibited by federal rules while flying below 10,000 feet.
 
It's not "small carriers" that are the issue... it's the BOTTOM FEEDER small carriers (i.e. Colgan, Mesa, etc.).

Take a look at some of the best "regionals" and their safety records....

American Eagle, Air Wisconsin, Comair, Skywest, Horizon...don't seem to be many issues there (aside from the LEX incident). But those airlines also pay well, treat employees well---which in turn will attract the most qualified candidates who know what to do in ice, or a stall, or when a caution or warning message comes up.
 
uhm, eagle, comair, ASA, expressjet have all had fatal accidents.

ASA's had nothing to do with poor piloting- quite the opposite actually. Both cases in ASA's past had very competent, and extremely tallented pilots behind the controls. However, it was the machine that broke- not the training.

Brazilia lost in Brunswick was the result of a prop overspeed. One of the sharpest and most tallented pilots within the ASA pilot ranks couldn't control it and it rolled over in the trees in the blink of an eye. If anyone could have saved it, it would have been Brad...........

Brazilia lost in Carrolton as a result of poor maintenance performed by Hamilton Standard on a prop blade.

How is this ASA's fault, in either case?
 
It's not "small carriers" that are the issue... it's the BOTTOM FEEDER small carriers (i.e. Colgan, Mesa, etc.).

Take a look at some of the best "regionals" and their safety records....

American Eagle, Air Wisconsin, Comair, Skywest, Horizon...don't seem to be many issues there (aside from the LEX incident). But those airlines also pay well, treat employees well---which in turn will attract the most qualified candidates who know what to do in ice, or a stall, or when a caution or warning message comes up.

The LEX "incident"???? Killed one less person than the Buffalo "incident".... So if bottom feeder is defined as killing one more person than Comair, then yes, Colgan is a bottom feeder. Genius.
 
my apologies to ASA. I by no means meant to imply the pilots were substandard, which they were absolutely not.
 
Brazilia lost in Carrolton as a result of poor maintenance performed by Hamilton Standard on a prop blade.

Might I add that due the ability of the pilots in the accident saved lives in what should have been an accident in which all were killed.
 
The only fatal accident remotely associated with XJT was caused by Britt airways, a predecessor to COEX flt 2574 09/11/1991. XJT after the merger has not had a fatal accident.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top