Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay, I am going to reply to this thread even though it is of very little use.
The age 65 change had nothing to do with how well prepared the senior folks were. It had nothing to do with the ICAO, APAAD, ALPA, SWAPA, or whatever other alphabet organization you want to throw out there. It had to do with one thing, and that was "who is going to write the check". That being the check to cover all these recently retired folks who lost their pension. Our underfunded, and over budget govt. had a few choices to make. The first, and most sensible would be to hold companies, and mgt responsible. If they did that they would be leaving all their CEO/Lawyer type buddies out in the cold. This would have been hard to do since most politicians used to be lawyers, who now make laws. The second choice would be to push it off on someone else, mainly the taxpayer. That would be you, and I. The ironic twist here is that by keeping pilots working 5 extra years kills a few birds with one stone. Just a few listed here:
1. They won't be collecting PBC money
2. They will continue paying taxes
3. They will keep their 401k money balances which will help keep money mgt. fee's churning
4. They will lose some of the best years of their lives, and will probably increase their chances of death before age 65, thus never going on the govt. books at all.
What has really happened is another govt. bailout by the employee. A self imposed B scale if you will. So I don't know what all the cheering is about.
The only real victory party going on here is the one they are having in D.C. You know those guys who voted 390-0 in favor of this law. I am sure they are at the club smoking fine cigars, and sipping brandy, giggling like mad over this moral crusade.
FedEx - Dozens of awarded Captain bids pulled due to 65.
CAL - 37 Captains bumped due to 65.
PIPE
mdf- well said
Rez- i agree w/ some of your points on apathy- but also think that there are things that alpa has done that increase that apathy instead of promote it. That being said-= i do have a question:
I'm an FO not making a whole lot- and yet my 2% is more than my cell phone, internet, or car insurance.
Aren't the majority of your arguments kind of like hiring a guy to mow your lawn and then have him tell you to help him mow?
I shouldn't have to tell comcast how to run their company- or help them do it- I just want my internet to work- and since i'm paying them for that- isn't that a justified sentiment?
Office space: "what exactly... would you say ... you do here??" Seriously- if it's ALL our fault- what are we paying for?
Leadership matters- and leaders don't blame those they lead.
It's not too much to expect some leadership AND results for all the money we give.
Is it too much to expect ALPA national to have a plan and be accountable to it?
To withdraw is regreesive.... If the inflight emergency doesn't meant your expectations do you slide the seat back and say... this suxs.. I am not flying anymore?
Rez has done more for his fellow pilots than probably anyone else on this board besides Occam. What is your vast resume of experience in assisting your fellow pilots? I agree with you about the Age-60 issue and Prater's backstabbing of the membership, but don't attack pilots like Rez that have worked so hard to improve the lives of their fellow pilots.The pilots who end up doing the worst things to their fellow pilots all start out talking like Rez.
Rez has done more for his fellow pilots than probably anyone else on this board besides Occam. What is your vast resume of experience in assisting your fellow pilots? I agree with you about the Age-60 issue and Prater's backstabbing of the membership, but don't attack pilots like Rez that have worked so hard to improve the lives of their fellow pilots.