Age 60 informal poll

[mrvmo]

HELL NAY!!uke:

 

[Occam's Razor]

Not to be picky...but don't you think the poll should be in the form of a question?

"Do you think the FAR should be changed.....?"

 

[Goose17]

No!

Life is full of discrimination - that is how you moved up!

Goose17

 

[ASADriver]

Yepper...

 

[Falconjet]

I'm not sure (which can't be good) but it appears that the way the poll that was added is worded exactly the opposite of your original question. I'm not sure how to vote on that poll, except that I'm pretty sure I voted for the change, which I am definitely not in favor of. I should have RTWFQ! before I voted.

As you can see those 6 years of college were wasted on me.

FJ

 

[bluesideup1]

Didn't read the question posted only the poll before voting. The question on the board and the Poll does not match so I voted wrong. Very bad wording on the Poll. This needs to be changed to something simple like most pilots can understand. "Keep the retirement age at 60?"

 

[Focus]

Last guy I flew with that was 59 not only said no but HELL No.......

 

[Focus]

then again the guy before him that had some money said "What the Hell".

 

[Focus]

Between the two I say....If the dudes got it, let it Roll.....Yea to 60

 

[Focus]

and Im still a friggin Fo at 42

 

[Focus]

Who amongst us really thinks that we should put this up for VOTE..???????????

 

[Focus]

Thats exactly what I thought.....Rock On.....

 

[dooork]

yea..

 

[bubbers44]

Abolish the Age 60 Rule for other that Part 91 pilots?

Then I can't fly my Cessna 150?

 

[71KILO]

Unfortunately, I didn't put the poll only question up. Who ever did, set it up backwards from the original post. Sneeky jerk, probably did it on purpose just to throw the results. I didn't pay attention either and voted opposite to my opinion. Therefore, the only accurate way at this point is to continue with the text vote and I'll keep track and keep you posted as often as possible.

The question again as simple as possible with out any strange wording:

Should the age 60 mandatory retirment rule for FAR part 121 operations be abolished? Yea or Nay

I'll post the current results on the next post, stand by...

 

[71KILO]

New numbers based on the text vote as of post #155
(because the poll only question is totally screwed up):

97 votes:

44 YEA (14 mil/30 civ) abolish the rule
54 NAY (16 mil/38 cvi) keep it at 60

56% say keep it the way it is. 44% say the age 60 rule sucks.

Don't forget: vote in text and screw the poll only question.

Of course you can fly a 150 after 60, but why?

Focus: what's up with the random thoughts, boosting your post numbers? Keep it to votes only

 

[Bambam]

I'm sorry, I had an intern under my desk distracting me...

What are we voting on again?

I vote yes change it.

 

[PCL_128]

No frickin' way!!!

 

[Bringupthebird]

The question again as simple as possible with out any strange wording:

Should the age 60 mandatory retirment rule for FAR part 121 operations be abolished? Yea or Nay

I'll post the current results on the next post, stand by...

That wasn't the original question. Originally Yes=change the rule No=keep the rule.

 

[71KILO]

That wasn't the original question. Originally Yes=change the rule No=keep the rule.

A complait was made that the question was too hard to understand and that the 60 rule applys to -121 ops only versus other than -91. So I worded it more simply, but it is the same question. The moderator (or someone else, I'm not sure) added the poll only question at the top of the thread and worded it opposite of the thread text question in post #1. Your text vote is therefore still good.