AA to drop Part of AmericanConnection

[3green]

You said it in your fist statment. Operational control!! If you look at The TSA/CHQ contracts, AA not only has operational control but has the rigt to take over the leases on these aircraft.

 

[atpcliff]

Hi!

Over on the TSA website, one poster had an interesting suggestion, to help both the American Connection carriers and AEagle.

That is, for Eagle to totally drop all of the Connection flying in St. Louis, then the 3 airlines that fly the Connection can join American's alliance, and do all of the same flying and feed, but just not be called American Connection.

Then, AA doesn't lose any feed, and the Connection carriers don't lose any passengers or revenue, and Eagle can add lots of jets and still stay under the ASM.

I just thought of something else. AA could sell Eagle, and have them join the Alliance, then they could permanently shrink AA mainline, and only grow the Eagle alliance, which would save AA a lot of money, and they could keep the B and C scale pilots flying at Eagle and Connection, without having to worry about all of their scope problems.

I think scope is causing problems for the pilot groups that have put this in their contracts, and inclusion will be better for them in the future.

What is your opinion?

Cliff
GB,WI

 

[flx757]

My opinion is that there are numerous threads on this site and many others where everyone that has an opinion on scope has expressed it over and over. Bottom line...scope is absolutely necessary.....in ANY contract at ANY airline.

 

[MetroSheriff]

Hi!

I just thought of something else. AA could sell Eagle, and have them join the Alliance, then they could permanently shrink AA mainline, and only grow the Eagle alliance, which would save AA a lot of money, and they could keep the B and C scale pilots flying at Eagle and Connection, without having to worry about all of their scope problems.

Cliff
GB,WI

Cliff,

I couldn't tell if your were being sarcastic or not. This is exactly what we want to prevent. Management would love to do just that. Basically, that idea supports the abrogation of scope and mgt ability to farm out the flying to lower paid pilot groups which in the long run would have a tremendously depressive effect on pilot compensation throughout the industry. This is a terrible idea and the consequences would not be pretty for any of us, regional or mainline.

Again, hard to tell the tone of your post. If you were being sarcastic, than please disregard.

 

[Saluki Dawg]

Now that TWA and AA have been awarded single carrier status, ALL flying being done in and out of STL SHOULD be flown by pilots on the Eagle seniority list and with Eagle A/C, period. I don't wish anyone from Chatauqua, TSA, or Corpex to lose their jobs, but the simple fact is that TWA doesn't exist anymore. When that happened, it was just as if TWA went out of business. I don't have a solution for what the Connection Carriers could do, but something needs to be done.

I work for COEX, and right now, we are having our own scope battles over both Commutair, and Gulfstream. There are also rumors that Chatauqua has been down in Houston talking to our senior management about doing feed for CAL. I know that WE at COEX or (ExpressJet) aren't going to let that happen, and Eagle cannot continue to let this happen. I think everyone needs to support the Eagle MEC in their efforts to get the flying out of STL done by American Eagle.

 

[3green]

well said (saluki dawg) Eagle needs all the feed, It's the way it has been and it's the way it should be. TSA/CHQ need to focus on something else, they are going to get jurked around in this mess, and it would be more advintagus for them to not get cought in the middle of this. I like TSA&CHQ, there a good group of pilots. They should pressure there company into focusing on more secure flying..

 

[I.P. Freley]

CommutAir scope violation!?

Let me get this straight, you are "battling" over the flying that GI and CA do on your behalf?? Do you really think that a bunch of 19-seaters are a threat to you? CoEx dumped all their 19-seat operations already, so don't blame the little guys for the problems over YOUR way. The scope already keeps the CommutAir planes out of Newark, for crying out loud (yes, they are Continental Connection but THEY AREN'T ALLOWED TO ACTUALLY CONNECT YOU TO ANYTHING!!), and I hardly think that CoEx is interested in many, if ANY, of the lines that CommutAir flies. If anything, they are feeding some traffic to Continental that Continental wouldn't or couldn't offer on their own... Read, more revenue for Continental, taking traffic away from Airways and the others that are the real competition in the northeast.

Do you realize that the average number of people on CommutAir flights is about a half-dozen? You think you want to run ATR's or Brasilias on those routes? CommutAir nearly went under last year carrying half that average load... Don't think that you could do any better, do you?

Stop thinking that anyone who flies under the Continental colors and isn't owned by Continental as the competition and you will probably sleep better at night. Worry about your own management, or mis-management, not the meager amount of traffic that you could THEORETICALLY carry at CoEx that is "stolen" from you by CommutAir or Gulfstream.

 

[Uncle Don]

OneWorld spin

Let get something straight.

1)Eagle nor Connection can be spun off into a OneWorld Member!

OneWorld must be an International Carrier/Feed, not Domestic.


2)If AMR Mngt would go along with APA and allow APA to take over all the flying done by AMR, none of this would even be a debate. You could put the best a/c on the best route.

Well, it is going to be a battle in Section 6 negotiations, but at least the Eagle and American Pilots and their unions are finially in the same army against the same enemy on this one. And are are playing a full court press.

Stay tuned!

 

[dispatchguy]

You said it in your fist statment. Operational control!! If you look at The TSA/CHQ contracts, AA not only has operational control but has the rigt to take over the leases on these aircraft.

I'm defining Operational Control as its defined in 121, the right to delay, divert, or cancel a flight - which is reserved to the dispatchers of CHQ and TSA for THEIR flights - Eagle DXR's cant touch a Connection flight.

AMR therefore, under 121, has no operational control over those aircraft - they may set the schedule, fares, yadda yadda yadda, but as far as 121 is concerned (and while I havent read a grievance specifically addressing it), the operational control meaning that I read in the AEA contract means the definition in FAR 121 - the right to delay, divert, cancel, or initiate a flight. That right rests with CHQ/TSA, their PICs and DXRs.

 

[TSA Pilot]

Saluki Dawg -

Even though I disagree with you because I stand to lose my job in the UNLIKELY event that the arbitrators rule we can't operate as American Connection. I just want to say GO SALUKI's!!! Tonight against Texas Tech on CBS baby!!!!!!! I won't hold it against you since you went to SIU. heheh

TSA Pilot