AA sued over peanuts!! Gimme a break

[atlcrashpad]

Airbadger, what is shockin' is duh size of dem tata's......... yeah.... bouyyyyyyyyyyy....

 

[dash_trash]

Amazing. How much you wanna bet she's a fat lady with a spoiled little sh*** for a kid, in other words your typical cracker.

http://www.1010wins.com/pages/2301561.php?contentType=4&contentId=2153142

Ridiculous waste of time … hope they toss the case.http://www.1010wins.com/PHOTO--Woman-Sues-Airline-over-In-Flight-Peanuts/2301561

 

[J.Otto]

Here's where she makes HER living:

http://www.stonybrookphysicians.com/doctor/HAQUE_MD_TEHMINA_2950.asp

 

[J.Otto]

And get this:

The lawyer representing her, well he's quite the cad himself.

http://overlawyered.com/2008/06/kenneth-mollins-attorney-for-peanut-suer-tehmina-haque/

Walter’s post about Tehmina Haque’s lawsuit against American Airlines over her “fear” of an unrealized peanut allergy is not the first time her attorney, Kenneth Mollins, has attempted such a tactic.

Mollins appeared on CNN in July 2007 after filing a suit on behalf of a woman, Francine Dorf, who sued Con Ed over the steam pipe eruption in Manhattan that month. Dorf wasn’t injured: she just complained that the loud sound reminded her of September 11, entitling her to damages, in part because she could not “focus enough to read the romance novels that she checked out from the library.” (See also Improved Clinch blog.) My Google-fu was not acute enough to find the docket in New York state court; does anyone know what the status of that lawsuit is?

What I did find was another lawsuit brought by Kenneth Mollins, plaintiff. Mollins leased an Infiniti, but was dissatisfied with the quality of the Bluetooth system and the GPS. After five months of haggling and attempts to fix the supposed problems, Mollins still wasn’t satisfied, the dealer took the car back and refunded Mollins’s money, including the deposit and all the monthly payments made to date. In other words, Mollins got five months’ use of an Infiniti for free. Not good enough for Mollins: he sued, seeking additional damages for the damage the alleged inability to use a cell phone did to his business. The court denied his attempt to turn it into a class action and dismissed; the lawyers were Herzfeld & Rubin.

We obviously should start keeping track of Mr. Mollins.

 

[Flybet3]

http://www.1010wins.com/pages/2301561.php?contentType=4&contentId=2153142

Ridiculous waste of time … hope they toss the case.http://www.1010wins.com/PHOTO--Woman-Sues-Airline-over-In-Flight-Peanuts/2301561

She works for Al-Qaeda!!!!!

 

[pipejockey]

Here's where she makes HER living:

http://www.stonybrookphysicians.com/doctor/HAQUE_MD_TEHMINA_2950.asp

Lets all flood this morons email with fake appointment requests or something.

 

[Flybet3]

Lets all flood this morons email with fake appointment requests or something.

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Count me in. I'll even include my avatar in the e-mail.

 

[Papa Woody]

The pus**fication of our society is getting out of control. Everything is a syndrome, illness, sickness, disability. Pathetic.

pusification: everyone is like pus.....oozing from a swollen red zit.

 

[Flybet3]

pusification: everyone is like pus.....oozing from a swollen red zit.

eeeewww uke:

 

[IslanderDriver]

So the kid was light sensitive:

http://www.intelihealth.com/IH/ihtIH/WS/9339/10710.html

How did he get to the airport to begin with? I imagine he was outside just a little...

Take frickin' greyhound if you have that much of an issue with sunlight or peanuts!

 

[say again]

Here's where she makes HER living:

http://www.stonybrookphysicians.com/doctor/HAQUE_MD_TEHMINA_2950.asp

UGHHHHH!!!!!uke: There is no possible way she can win this, she's hideous looking. If she was remotely good looking she may have stood a chance, but but her looks and lawsuit are severly lacking.:laugh:

 

[LJDRVR]

Reasonable:

So, I'm an MD. My kid's allergic to peanuts. I was told several times when I asked AA about the issue that peanuts may be present on the airplane. Peanuts may threaten my son's life.

My options are:

• Don't fly, avoid the risk completely.

• Load up son on benadryl and make sure I've got an Epi pen in my purse.

Unreasonable:

• Go anyway, then claim I was lied to. Hire a lawyer and claim my civil rights were violated, even though I'm pretty sure freedom from nut products is not an amendment to the Constitution and AAL's "Nut Policy" was clearly delineated on their website.

Fluent in Urdu and French, eh? Algerian/Pakistani terrorist. What exactly was she doing on that airplane?

 

[saab fixr]

LOser!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Shes a moron, I watched that on TV and couldnt believe she actually got on a plane knowing this and then claim its the airlines fault. Someone should stuff some peanuts you know where I just cant believe people actually try and make a living sueing the airlines for stress? what did she think was going to happen? for the price of the ticket who is she to complain!@ Next time do the whole airline industry a favor Rent a car and drive !! IDIOT

 

[CopilotDoug]

Dorf wasn’t injured: she just complained that the loud sound reminded her of September 11, entitling her to damages, in part because she could not “focus enough to read the romance novels that she checked out from the library.”

That's rich!

"Your Honor, my client is entitled to damages because she can't diddle herself while reading her smutt books...":laugh:

 

[Indy319FA]

Not saying I agree with the suit, but these peanut allergies can be serious. Usually the parents and passengers are very cooperative. If a kid has a real peanut allergy, you will have to remove all the peanuts on the aircraft, and vacuum the seats where they sit. The kid will also have a sticker or a lanyard that will say something about not feeding peanut products to the kid. Also, they will always bring their own food because most snacks are cooked in peanut oil. They will have a note from a physician stating the child cannot consume peanuts or be in proximity to peanut dust.

Generally speaking people with this problem have varying sensitvities. 90% of them just can't eat peanut products but have no problems if peanuts are served on board. For the remaining 10% it is dangerous to have peanuts on board because they can have a reaction from inhaling the dust.

You will find some that have a low sensitivity demand that peanuts not be served as a control thing. The best way to know if it is someone with a serious allergy is the Doctor's note, and they will also ask to have their seats and the immediate area vacuumed thoroughly.

Sounds like this lady is a control freak and has a child with a mild allergy. If this kid was seriously allergic to peanuts, she would never have allowed the plane to leave the gate.