Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

A better way to board a plane

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Or as a comedian once said-when they announce the boarding of the plane all of the passengers act like it is the last plane out of Saigon-Hang tight folks they plane wont leave till everyone is on board LOL
 
...boarding method that's SIX TIMES FASTER than the current method, or that management will probably completely ignore this scientific research!

I believe it says it's 1/6th faster, or 16% faster. Still, a 30 min boarding could be reduced to a 25 mins, saving 5 min on the ground.

It will work. Someone has to change computer systems to automatically assign zones using the new method. Even if some dumb pax makes a mistake it probably won't affect the overall efficiency.

It beats the stupid Southwest mad-dash-cattle-boarding process...
 
There's always the last minute folks who belong scattered throughout. So they could easily put a dampen on this theoretical model of seating efficency.

Not everyone will conform to the seating calls. A lot of PAX hate sitting in their seat while on the ground, boarding.
 
I think it will make boarding even faster if airlines will start charging passengers for each bag they carry on board instead of for the ones the check-in.
 
I believe it says it's 1/6th faster, or 16% faster. Still, a 30 min boarding could be reduced to a 25 mins, saving 5 min on the ground.

Thats not quite correct. It says it will be done in 1/6th of time, which means boarding in 5 min versus 30 min.

(The simulations suggest that using something like the above protocol would reduce boarding time to 1/6th of that required by the standard procedure!)
 
He never said it was an airplane with 120 seats, he said it was an airplane with 120 passengers.

OK, then -- so we've gone from bad math to a totally unrealistic assumption for his calculations. I'm not sure that that's any better.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom