I think what GCD may have been referring to is the buffet boundry. Optimum altitude was the one that gave you a 1.3G buffet boundry for moderate turbulence or, I think, a sustained 30 deg. bank turn. 2.0g was needed for severe turbulence. The special engines, -7R and -7Q, could get you to an altitude where the wing had little margin above stall in a turn or for turbulence. I know our 747-200 freighter, with -7Q's on a ferry or very light load leg, would get you too high for your own good as we discovered one night when we lost both yaw dampers.
Interesting fact: In the early years Pan Am made crews fly the whole leg with one pilot having his hands on the throttles at all times. The early JT-9D's were so were so critical that a bleed could stick or airflow disrupted and suddenly the EGT would go to a 1000 degs or more and cook the turbines. This went on for a year or more until they improved it with the -3 and -3A mods. On the ground turning 90 degs. while taxiing in a strong wind would do the same and for years the FEO had to keep his hands near or on on the cut-off levers while taxiing. Someone said it was the first large engine that did not have key engine sections proven by military flying as was the B-707 and others. Engine maint. was so expensive it probably contributed something to Pan Ams later demise.